similar to: Auth cache does not take %real_rip into account

> On 12 April 2019 21:45 Robert Kudyba via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > You are running some kind of proxy in front of it. > > No proxy. Just sendmail with users using emacs/Rmail or Webmail/Squirrelmail. > > > If you want it to show real client IP, you need to enable forwarding of said data. With dovecot it's done by setting > >

> > > On 12 April 2019 21:45 Robert Kudyba via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > You are running some kind of proxy in front of it. > > > > No proxy. Just sendmail with users using emacs/Rmail or > Webmail/Squirrelmail. > > > > > If you want it to show real client IP, you need to enable forwarding > of

> > You are running some kind of proxy in front of it. No proxy. Just sendmail with users using emacs/Rmail or Webmail/Squirrelmail. > If you want it to show real client IP, you need to enable forwarding of > said data. With dovecot it's done by setting > > login_trusted_networks = your-upstream-host-or-net > > in backend config file. > OK I changed it and

Timo, Please check the code. I didn't add it, but a real_lip might be useful for some people as well. Also, I notice that pop3-proxy is doing a different xsession than the imap proxy. Is there an xsession standard that is different between the two, or just an oversight in the code? Both send the remote address/port, but only imap proxy sends the local address/port. This patch declares

> On 12 April 2019 18:11 Robert Kudyba via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > Probably there's an existing solution for both problems (subsequent > > attempts and dnsbl): > > > > >

I'd like to get the IP-address of the webmail-klient logged in my maillog (for being compliant with coming data retention policies). I've noticed that with login_trusted_networks pointing at my dovecot directors, we get rip=client-ip logged on the backends. How is the proxy providing this to the dovecot backends? Anybody know what magic we need to implement in our webmail-solution to be

hi all, I've been tasked to add sieve/managesieve to an existing dovecot cluster running 2.1.7 on debian wheezy which is made up of 2 dovecot-proxy hosts as directors and some back end dovecot imap hosts all running the same version. My problem is that I thought to put the service on the director/proxy hosts since they wouldn't have too much load on it, but when I do I get the

Hi All, I have compared Dovecot performance to Courier and it appears that as a POP3 server Dovecot is slower in 2 times but as an IMAP server it is faster in 1.5 times. The same node (16CPUs), testing time is 30 min, please see results and dovecot configs attached. Benchmark software is MStone used by Sendmail Inc so is is quite reliable. I do not see anything else to tweak in Dovecot to

Hello, I have configured director in front of dovecot imap/pop/lmtp servers. When I need to manipulate a user mailbox, I use doveadm commands at director server's, with -S option. But some commands return exit code 139 when command returns more than 40 entries (I think). For example, the command: sudo doveadm fetch -u amateo hdr mailbox Trash HEADER Subject "nyctalus11/"

Hello, I`ve got a question about Dovecot-Director and (Manage)-Sieve: is there any possibility to pass-through the original IP-address to the backend server? In this case I try to pass-through the IP-address of a webmail server. I`ve looked for a solution in different forums and tried it with the parameter "login_trusted_networks", however no success. The above solution is working

hi we are using dovecot version 2.2.7 (config file given below) centos 6, qmail, vpopmail, mysql server configuration hex core processor, 16 gb ram 1 X 600 gb 15 k rpm for main drive and 2 X 2000 gb hdd for data (No raid) busy server with around 4000 email ids --- load is around 2 to 10 the issue is that SQUIRRELMAIL webmail users suddenly lose connection while they are working on the webmail.

Hello to all After a lot of tries using dovecot 2.2.10 on centos 7 latest ...i could not manage make dovecot dsync work ... i have tried a lot of scenarios using mysql as backend , custom user file. Using by command line the dsync it works fine Has anyone managed to use 2.2.10 ..? -----Original Message----- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of dovecot-request at

Dovecot users list, I started having problems with Outlook not syncing with Dovecot a public imap folder upon issuing a send/receive in the client; eventually Outlook timed out, and I received the following error in the Dovecot log. Jan 23 09:20:23 imap(user at mydom.com): Error: FETCH [] for mailbox projects.myfolder UID 120 got too little data: 7744 vs 7759 Jan 23 09:20:23 imap(user at

Here's a few tips: 1. I assume that's a 2U format -24 bays.?You only have 1 raid card for all 24 disks ? Granted you only have 16, but usually you should assign 1 card per 8 drives. In our standard 2U chassis we have 3 hba's per 8 drives. Your backplane should support that. 2. Add more drives 3. Get a pci nvme ssd card and move the indexes/control/sieve files there.? On Monday,

I have not tried it at all. Was just an suggestion. You can try something like protocol lda { namespace archive { ... } } On 10.02.2017 14:12, Nick Lekkas wrote: > > Hi Aki > > > > Thanks for your answer .... > > What version of dovecot have you tried it ? Mine is 2.2.10 > > > > > > > > > > *From:*Aki Tuomi

I have dovecot 2.0.11 installed on a CentOS 5.7 email server. Two of the server email clients, one using Outlook and the other Thunderbird, have had all the contents of their inbox disappear only to reappear at a later time. One client's inbox email reappeared upon receiving a test email (to check if it would show up in the inbox) from another user. Has anyone heard of such a thing?

Hi, It seems the use of login_trusted_networks is overloaded. Example: * It's used for indicating which hosts you trust to provide XCLIENT remote IP's. * It's used for indicating from which hosts you trust logins enough to disable auth penalty. (like in a webmail) However... trustwise, this is trusting two different entities. The first case you put trust in the host. In the second

Hi, I am using dovecot 2.0.9 (official CentOS rpm), I am experiencing very high load issue. I think it is something related to my storage (/var/spool is about 3 TB and it is almost full). I noticed those kind of messages in /var/log/maillog: Warning: Maildir: Scanning /var/spool/pop/domains/domain.it/username/Maildir/cur took 100 seconds (14281 readdir()s, 0 rename()s to cur/) Warning:

Hi all, I want to remove the authentication penalty for specific ip addresses (subnets if possible). I am using Dovecot 2.3.2 (582970113) and figured that this information: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Penalty > If the IP is in login_trusted_networks (e.g. webmail), skip any authentication penalties is not up to date. Instead this information is:

Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.1.1 with vpopmail 5.4.30 with multiples domains and I have problems setting up synchronization in between multiple computers. All act like master (my clients can connect to any of the them and read their emails either via POP3 either via IMAP, inbound email gets on any of the machines). Each machine is on a different continent, there is no shared drive in between