similar to: dsync for subscription on public/shared folder

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "dsync for subscription on public/shared folder"

2016 Dec 14
2
public folder subscriptions sync issue with ldap user/group in dovecot-acl
On 14 Dec 2016, at 11.16, Mike Fr?hner <mikefroehner at gmx.de> wrote: > > I made some additional tests and found that also local unix groups are not working in replacement for my ldap groups as discribed below. > > Do groups in dovecot-acl intendedly not work? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/ACL <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/ACL> -> ACL groups support works by returning a
2016 Dec 13
2
public folder subscriptions sync issue with ldap user/group in dovecot-acl
Hello people, I am having an issue with 'doveadm sync'. I am currently trying to have two dovecots behind an haproxy (works fine). Therefore I configured these two dovecot server (imap-1/imap-2) to sync throught dsync. This works just partly. The sync of the maiboxes is fine, but the sync of the subscriptions file just works partly. It works for private folder subscription, but not
2016 Dec 16
0
public folder subscriptions sync issue with ldap user/group in dovecot-acl
Thanks for your reply Timo. On 12/14/2016 06:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 14 Dec 2016, at 11.16, Mike Fr?hner <mikefroehner at gmx.de > <mailto:mikefroehner at gmx.de>> wrote: >> >> I made some additional tests and found that also local unix groups are >> not working in replacement for my ldap groups as discribed below. >> >> Do groups in
2016 Dec 14
0
public folder subscriptions sync issue with ldap user/group in dovecot-acl
I made some additional tests and found that also local unix groups are not working in replacement for my ldap groups as discribed below. Do groups in dovecot-acl intendedly not work? On 12/13/2016 03:47 PM, Mike Fr?hner wrote: > Hello people, > > I am having an issue with 'doveadm sync'. I am currently trying to have > two dovecots behind an haproxy (works fine). Therefore I
2020 Nov 11
2
DNS forwarding for guest domains on isolated network
Hi @all, I'm having trouble to realize my use case and hope somebody could help me. # Use case For a home lab I want to deploy several guest domains. These domains must not have a direct or NAT connection to the internet or my LAN. They should only be able to reach my LAN and the internet through a proxy. # What I've done I've created the following virtual switch in isolated
2009 May 18
4
[LLVMdev] Getting exceptions to work?
I've been struggling for several days, trying to get native exceptions to work in my code. I managed to boil down the IR to the simplest possible example that I can think of. If anyone on this list can tell me what changes I need to make to the following code to get it to work (i.e. return 0 instead of a bus error), it would make my life immensely better. ; ModuleID =
2009 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Getting exceptions to work?
Hi Talin, You're not using the llvm intrinsics for exception handling, so your code won't work. Using _Unwind_RaiseException should be OK, but your main function must at least use llvm.eh.exception, llvm.eh.selector.i32/64 and probably __cxa_begin_catch and __cxa_end_catch. Nicolas Talin wrote: > I've been struggling for several days, trying to get native exceptions > to
2010 Feb 04
1
smbpasswd vs passwd to change
Not sure if someone here can answer this for me. The OpenLDAP guys have blown me off on this one. I have a standalone server which is using ldap as the passdb backend. I can ssh into an account. I can show that "smbclient works -L localhost -U ldaptestuser" works. If I change the password using smbpasswd both still work with new password. If i change the password using
2009 May 19
5
[LLVMdev] Getting exceptions to work?
Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi Talin, > > You're not using the llvm intrinsics for exception handling, so your > code won't work. Using _Unwind_RaiseException should be OK, but your > main function must at least use llvm.eh.exception, > llvm.eh.selector.i32/64 and probably __cxa_begin_catch and __cxa_end_catch. > Let me ask a follow-up question then - if the
2020 Nov 11
0
Re: DNS forwarding for guest domains on isolated network
On 11/11/20 3:40 AM, Jörg Kastning wrote: > Hi @all, > > I'm having trouble to realize my use case and hope somebody could help me. > > # Use case > > For a home lab I want to deploy several guest domains. These domains > must not have a direct or NAT connection to the internet or my LAN. They > should only be able to reach my LAN and the internet through a
2013 May 20
1
dsync-2.2.2 incorrectly synchronizes subscription status of deleted mailbox
Hi, It seems that dsync-2.2.2 doesn't correctly synchronize subscription status of a deleted mailbox. The situation is as follows. There are two servers: A and B, and a test user test_mdbox. Mailboxes (mdbox) of this user on both servers are synchronized. Specifically on both of them there is a Trash/x mailbox. Replication plugin is disabled. I delete Thrash/x mailbox on A with
2006 Dec 28
1
ActionMailer/SMTP: Net::SMTPSyntaxError when message body contains only a 'dot'
FYI: I don''t think this is a very well know. It seems that, on some operating systems, ActionMailer/SMTP crashes when it sends an email with only a ''.'' (aka a ''dot'' or a ''period''). Specifically, you get Net::SMTPSyntaxError (502 Error: command not implemented): Environment Details: $ uname -a Linux private1 2.6.15-26-server #1 SMP
2013 Nov 19
1
dsync-2.2.7 incorrectly synchronizes subscription status of renamed mailbox
Hi, It seems that dsync-2.2.7 doesn't correctly synchronize subscription status of a renamed mailbox. The situation is as follows. There are two servers: A and B, and a test user test_mdbox. Mailboxes (mdbox) of this user on both servers are synchronized. Specifically on both of them there is a (subscribed) Test1 mailbox. Replication plugin is disabled. I rename Test1 to Test2 on A with
2009 May 19
0
[LLVMdev] Getting exceptions to work?
Talin wrote: > Nicolas Geoffray wrote: >> Hi Talin, >> >> You're not using the llvm intrinsics for exception handling, so your >> code won't work. Using _Unwind_RaiseException should be OK, but your >> main function must at least use llvm.eh.exception, >> llvm.eh.selector.i32/64 and probably __cxa_begin_catch and __cxa_end_catch. >> >
2009 May 03
12
DNAT Question
Hi list, I have a shorewall installed on 2 interfaces which also has multiple static public IP. Let''s say I have 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5. I have assigned nat with: 1.2.3.4 eth0 11.22.33.4 no no But then I have a situation where I need 11.22.33.44 to connect to a host in the net zone and appears also to be 1.2.3.5 not only 1.2.3.4. How to do it? TIA Willy
2010 Apr 07
2
dsync convert Maildir -> mdbox, separators in subscriptions file
Hello, I'm playing around with Dovecot 2.0 beta 4. If I use dsync to convert a users mail stored in Maildir format to mdbox format, the subscriptions file in the new mdbox is created using the wrong mailbox separator ('.') leading to folders within folders not being readable by clients using the subscription feature. Excerpt from IMAP: . LIST "" "*" * LIST
2006 Apr 27
15
Which is faster, calling helpers or rendering a partial?
Using partials is a nice way to separate chunks of content into separate pages as opposed to building strings in helpers, but I''m wondering which is faster. It scares me when I see stuff like: Rendered users/_public (0.00051) Rendered users/_public (0.00009) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) ....50 more times Has anyone
2019 Jun 19
3
[PATCH 18/22] mm: mark DEVICE_PUBLIC as broken
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 06:23:04PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > On 6/13/19 5:43 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:58:29PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > >>> > ... > >> Hum, so the only thing this config does is short circuit here: > >> > >> static
2019 Jun 26
1
[PATCH 18/22] mm: mark DEVICE_PUBLIC as broken
On Tue 25-06-19 20:15:28, John Hubbard wrote: > On 6/19/19 12:27 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 06:23:04PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > >> On 6/13/19 5:43 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:58:29PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: >
2012 Jul 14
1
Migrating with dsync and INBOX.INBOX namespace issue
I'm working on migrating IMAP users from Mirapoint Message Servers to Dovecot servers. The Mirapoint IMAP server uses INBOX as a namespace for private mailboxes. I created the same namespace in Dovecot, but when I migrate mailboxes dsync seems to ignore/miss the namespace on Mirapoint and I end up with all mailboxes under a INBOX.INBOX hierarchy. Mirapoint Source Server