Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Problem with multiple ldap passdb"
2017 Jun 07
1
Dovecot LDAP using custom field to allow users to connect
Hi Michael,
Just noticed you are using auth_bind_userdn which we don't.
I think you may need to use pass_filter rather than user_filter??
Best Regards
Martin
On 2017-06-07 10:59, Martin Wheldon wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> We do exactly that see example below:
>
> user_filter =
>
2016 Nov 30
3
Sieve script won't compile. Compiler output isn't helpful.
Hello Martin,
Wow. That was indeed the problem. I have been staring at that small
script for a week and I just couldn't see it. I even had a friend look
at it and he couldn't find it either. I feel a bit ridiculous now.
Thanks so much for your help,
Steven
On 11/30/2016 04:48 AM, Martin Wheldon wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> OK a on closer inspection :)
>
> You are missing
2005 Dec 02
3
[Bug 1129] sshd hangs for command-only invocations due to fork/child signals
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129
Summary: sshd hangs for command-only invocations due to
fork/child signals
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.2p1
Platform: ix86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: bitbucket
2016 Nov 30
2
Sieve script won't compile. Compiler output isn't helpful.
Hey martin,
Thanks for the reply! I made the changes you suggested but I got the
same results.
According to my understanding, #header "from" "person at example.com"# is
correct for an exact match.
On 11/30/2016 04:10 AM, Martin Wheldon wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> I think you may be missing the :contains from the two header lines below:
>
>> if anyof (header
2013 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] optimizing references within a struct
There is an optimization which the Greenhills compiler does for mips16.
I have not looked at it myself ,but it was recounted to me.
The basic idea is that if you have a large struct, rather than
reference each element from the base of the struct, it's possible to
chose some optimal point(s) that are not at the beginning of the struct
and use as the base to reference elements of the
2017 Jun 07
2
Dovecot LDAP using custom field to allow users to connect
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's possible to add a custom field when the
authentification is made by users.
My boolean custom field will be for example "AllowUser" (false/true).
I'm trying to do something like that but it's not working :
/user_filter =
(&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u)(objectClass=myclass)(AllowUser=TRUE))/
This is my dovecot/ldap
2013 Feb 08
0
[LLVMdev] optimizing references within a struct
This sounds similar to what the LocalStackSlotAllocation pass does (lib/CodeGen/LocalStackSlotAllocation.cpp).
-Jim
On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:56 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:
> There is an optimization which the Greenhills compiler does for mips16.
>
> I have not looked at it myself ,but it was recounted to me.
>
> The basic idea is that if you have a large
2013 Feb 08
1
[LLVMdev] optimizing references within a struct
On 02/07/2013 05:28 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote:
> This sounds similar to what the LocalStackSlotAllocation pass does (lib/CodeGen/LocalStackSlotAllocation.cpp).
>
> -Jim
exactly but this is for structs but maybe you are saying that i can
reuse those ideas for structs.
i'm going to turn on the localstackallocation soon . maybe i need to
study that and write
something similar for plain
2006 Mar 20
5
Sortabls onUpdate function
I have this code.
<script type="text/javascript">
Sortable.create(''orderable'', {onUpdate: doAlert});
function doAlert() {
alert("Hello");
}
</script>
But when I move an item it doesn''t fire the doAlert command, am I
missing something?
2017 Mar 14
2
[cfe-dev] proposal - pragma section directive in clang
Thanks Reid/Jonathon for your replies.
Reid,
An important case against module level flags is that it wont allow changing or resetting section names e.g.
int a;
#pragma clang section bss = "xyz"
int b;
In case above, users would like to see only 'b' placed in 'xyz' and not 'a' as well.
Link pointed to by Jonathon seems to require same behavior.
2016 Nov 30
0
Sieve script won't compile. Compiler output isn't helpful.
Op 30-11-2016 om 11:04 schreef Steven Mainor:
> Hello Martin,
>
> Wow. That was indeed the problem. I have been staring at that small
> script for a week and I just couldn't see it. I even had a friend look
> at it and he couldn't find it either. I feel a bit ridiculous now.
Making the handling/reporting of unterminated quoted strings better has
been on my list for a
2006 Feb 12
2
[Bug 1129] sshd hangs for command-only invocations due to fork/child signals
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129
------- Comment #4 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-02-12 12:41 -------
Created an attachment (id=1065)
--> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1065&action=view)
Move debug from signal handler
I think we should just remove the debug from it signal handler. It is not safe
on platforms that don't implement syslog_r properly.
2008 Nov 28
1
MixMonitor with non-20ms packets
Hi,
MixMonitor saves partial conversation when non-standard voice packet
size is set (Asterisk 1.4.18.1). For example, if SIP-peer has alaw:30
then saved file would contain only 67% of total conversation. With
alaw:20 MixMonitor saves 100% of conversation.
It seems that MixMonitor has hardcoded "packets per second" or "samples
per packet" values.
I did a lot of googling, but
2008 Nov 28
0
[SPAM] - Asterisk and S-Bus - Email found in subject
Have you set port 2 as 'NT' in the mISDN config file (not the Asterisk one)?
Also, you will probably need to set it to ptmp.
You need to configure them in misdn.conf (the Asterisk one this time).
Here's the tail of my misdn.conf (4 x BRI):
[trunks]
ports = 1,2 ; physical port numbers (as defined in mISDN.conf)
context = inbound ; context for incoming calls in
2016 Nov 30
1
Sieve script won't compile. Compiler output isn't helpful.
Hey Stephan,
Its okay I should have been able to spot that as many times as I read it. I feel very silly about it.
I just recently started using sieve but already I love how powerful it is.
Thanks,
Steven
On November 30, 2016 5:44:55 AM EST, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote:
>
>
>Op 30-11-2016 om 11:04 schreef Steven Mainor:
>> Hello Martin,
>>
2016 Feb 04
3
Evaluating a port to RTEMS (embedded OS with single address space and no processes)
Am 04.02.2016 um 14:46 schrieb Roland Mainz:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Christian Mauderer
> <christian.mauderer at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>> I am searching a SSH server for remote administration of an embedded
>> application running on RTEMS (https://www.rtems.org). This environment
>> has neither virtual memory nor user and kernel space. So this is like
2016 Nov 30
0
Sieve script won't compile. Compiler output isn't helpful.
Hi Steven,
OK a on closer inspection :)
You are missing a closing double quote on line 59:
> fileinto :create "Lists/Debain/News;
should be:
fileinto :create "Lists/Debain/News";
Best Regards
Martin
On 2016-11-30 09:30, Steven Mainor wrote:
> Hey martin,
>
> Thanks for the reply! I made the changes you suggested but I got the
> same results.
>
>
2017 Mar 14
2
[cfe-dev] proposal - pragma section directive in clang
Hi Reid,
Unfortunately yes, it is.
> If we do go with approach 3, I'd recommend adding a single metadata
attachment that controls all sections a global could possibly live in
(text, data, rdata, bss).
I agree with this, although I think using metadata here wouldn't be right -
don't we need to use attributes when dropping metadata would cause
miscompiles?
I was considering adding
2017 Mar 10
3
[cfe-dev] proposal - pragma section directive in clang
+llvm-dev properly this time.
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 at 09:42 James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Reid, all,
>
> +llvm-dev as this RFC involves changes in Clang and LLVM.
>
> This RFC has stagnated and I think that's partially because the proposal
> isn't particularly elegant and is light on details. We've been having a
> rethink and have a
2003 Feb 24
6
what's on port 139
Having trouble with Samba.
The config file passes the test (testparm)
The Server seems to be upa and running fine (smbclient -L localhost)
But can't seem to connect to it from other computers (running 2000 or 98)
They were able to connect once though.
What should be listed on port 139 in services. We have :
netbios-ssn
Does this sound right?
Appreciate any help/suggestions!!
Regards, Andrew