similar to: Index-cache sizes

This is my first post to this list/gmane newsgroup, so please be gentle with me.... :-) Here's my situation: I have a user (the "main boss secretary") who uses MS Outlook 2007 as her email client. She has over 46,000 messages in her inbox, with nobody knows how many more in 75+ different folders & subfolders. Surprisingly, her response time wasn't too terrible up

I am getting lots of these error messages in the log file, any idea why? vsz_limit = 512M Dec 14 00:50:12 lmtp(it at wenn.com)(it at wenn.com): Error: mmap_anon(211079168) failed: Cannot allocate memory -- The information contained in or attached to this email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not

Sorry in advance for the newbie question. Can''t get aaf going and can''t find similarly stuck folks on this forum. I''m running Rails on my local machine in development mode. I installed ferret 0.11.0 gem, and the most recent stable aaf plugin (as of today). I''m having trouble getting the most basic functionality working. In my model Recipe, I have:

I have Poolmon (https://github.com/brandond/poolmon) set up. When it does all the checks concurrently, obviously there are locking issues on each mailserver it tests: "Warning: Locking transaction log file xxxx/indexes/dovecot.list.index.log took 60 seconds (syncing)" It's just an empty mailbox. Is there any way to do a login test, without locking the index files? Hence

I implemented a "reindex" command which simply creates an IndexWriter with :create => true for a prexisting index. The "reindexing" seems to start out ok, with several thousand docs added, then Ferret throws an exception: IO Error occured: couldn''t rename file "index\_0.tmp" to "index\_0.cfs": <File exists> I guess that _0.cfs is held

Does "doveadm index -A INBOX" reindex everything? What about users with multiple folders, both subbed & not subbed under INBOX? -- Daniel

We have several hundred mailboxes that have thousands of files in them (spam boxes) We currently run a find command and remove the files that are over 7 days old but still have boxes with upto 60k messages in them. I know that dovecot will update the index files for each mailbox when the boxes is accessed by an IMAP client(Webmail using Squirrel)but that can take quite a while to index. What I

I''m noting that every time I run Model.rebuild_index its running twice the rebuild_index. Also, on ferret_index.log there is only one small difference from the first and second time, see: First time it shows: rebuild index: [] reindexing model User After it finishes, it automatically starts the second time and shows; rebuild index: [["User"]] reindexing model User The full

On 2018-10-05 11:35, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 4 Oct 2018, at 17.13, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> >> On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >>>> Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. >>>> to this

Hi everyone, We''re running a fairly heavily used Rails app that uses ferret (and acts_as_ferret) for search. We''re running on mongrel+Apache, Ruby 1.8.4, and ferret 0.10.13. We''re indexing a handful of attributes on our "Image" and "User" models. After the system has been running for several days, the index gradually becomes corrupted, and ferret

> This certainly sounds stressful. Yes! > Another way to (on a backup, particularly given your history above) remove the index is with samba-tool dbcheck --reindex. Re-indexing... completed re-index OK 0 root at empire:~[0] samba-tool dns add empire chester-dc.example.com p-cats A 10.4.4.142 -U ash Password for [CHESTER-DC\ash]: Record added successfully Thanks! > The missing

Hi, I've setup FTS using lucene and it should be working, the lucene index is updated when mail arrives. I also managed to reindex my INBOX: doveadm index -u foo -q INBOX However, when I try to index an Archives folder: doveadm index -u foo -q Archives, the index-work crashed with this log message: dovecot: indexer-worker(foo): Panic: file message-decoder.c: line 363

On 07 Apr 2016, at 14:49, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > On 2016-04-06 21:09, Tom Sommer wrote: >> On 2016-04-06 20:38, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 06 Apr 2016, at 13:43, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >>>> I'm switching quota backend to redis (from maildir++), so all my current usages are reset. >>>> I get that

On 10 Jan 2017, at 20.38, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > I have Poolmon (https://github.com/brandond/poolmon) set up. When it does all the checks concurrently, obviously there are locking issues on each mailserver it tests: > > "Warning: Locking transaction log file xxxx/indexes/dovecot.list.index.log took 60 seconds (syncing)" > > It's just

On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. >> to this directory? > > > What dotlocks? I guess mbox and Maildir have some locks that could be > moved there, but a better performance optimization for those > installations

On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 14:49 +0100, ash-samba at comtek.co.uk wrote: > We have a Samba primary domain controller "empire", which seems to > have > DNS update issues. We can seem to query all records on empire just > fine, > and we can modify IPs for existing records, but it will not delete or > add new records. Attempting to delete via the AD tools shows "Local >

On 5 Oct 2018, at 16.42, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk <mailto:mail at tomsommer.dk>> wrote: > > On 2018-10-05 11:50, Tom Sommer wrote: >> On 2018-10-05 11:35, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 17.13, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk <mailto:mail at tomsommer.dk>> wrote: >>>> On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote:

On 2016-04-05 08:44, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: >> On April 5, 2016 at 9:27 AM Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> >> On 2016-04-04 20:22, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: >> >> > Since the API is still a little beta, it will not return anything in >> > case >> > doveadm does not like the arguments (that is, calls

My high school computer lab has a Samba file server, currently running SuSE Linux 9.3; over the summer, I plan to wipe out the hard drives and install SuSE Linux 10.0; with this in mind, I have just downloaded the latest Samba, and I was struck by the tremendous difference between the relative sizes of samba-3.0.5 and samba-3.0.22. 6,413,555 samba-3.0.5-0.1.i586.rpm 10/01/2004 04:54

>> Andrew Bartlett > I haven't actually got ldbdump on the machine, and I can't see it in > the Debian packages. That said, I do appear to be able to add DNS > records now, so I'm assuming it was the index. If you particularly > want me to find out then I'll try to get a dump, but as long as its > working I'm happy to leave it be! > > Ash Well, I