similar to: Dovecot Proxy and Director

> On October 29, 2016 at 5:17 PM Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > just a simple question: by using a directory and a proxy, I would be > able to totally hide the pop3/imap server ip addresses from outside? > I'm asking this because I would like to hide the real server IP for > security reasosn (DDoS and so on). >

I'm migrating an old server to another old server (same dovecot version in both servers) The migration itself is straightforward, stop dovecot on the old server, migrate everything via rsync, start dovecot to the new server. There is only one step left: change the dns configuration, pointing from the old server to the newer one. As most of domains are not managed by me and some other domains

Hi to all I was looking at protonmail.com Is possible to implement and end-to-end encryption with dovecot, where server-side there is no private key to decrypt messages? If I understood properly, on protonmail the private key is encrypted with user's password, so that only an user is able to decrypt the mailbox. Anything similiar ?

Il 26 ott 2016 8:30 AM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> ha scritto: > I would recommend using same major release with replication. > > If you are using maildir++ format, it should be enough to copy all the > maildir files over and start dovecot on new server. > This is much easier than dovecot replication as i can start immedialy with no need to upgrade the

Hi, can someone tell me the differenct between geo-replication and plain rsync? On which frequency files are replicated with geo-replication? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120427/72f35727/attachment.html>

Hi to all I have some *production* pop3/inappropriate server that i would like to move under a proxy Some questions: 1. Keeping the same original hostname on the proxy (in example mail.mydomain.tld) and changing the hostname on the imap server, makes some troubles like MUA redownloading all the messages? Is dovecot (running on the imap server) happy seeing the hostname change? What about

Init.d/system.d script doesn't kill gluster automatically on reboot/shutdown? Il 29 giu 2017 5:16 PM, "Ravishankar N" <ravishankar at redhat.com> ha scritto: > On 06/29/2017 08:31 PM, Renaud Fortier wrote: > > Hi, > > Everytime I shutdown a node, I lost access (from clients) to the volumes > for 42 seconds (network.ping-timeout). Is there a special way to

2017-09-08 13:44 GMT+02:00 Pavel Szalbot <pavel.szalbot at gmail.com>: > I did not test SIGKILL because I suppose if graceful exit is bad, SIGKILL > will be as well. This assumption might be wrong. So I will test it. It would > be interesting to see client to work in case of crash (SIGKILL) and not in > case of graceful exit of glusterfsd. Exactly. if this happen, probably there

Gandalf, SIGKILL (killall -9 glusterfsd) did not stop I/O after few minutes. SIGTERM on the other hand causes crash, but this time it is not read-only remount, but around 10 IOPS tops and 2 IOPS on average. -ps On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > I currently only have a Windows 2012 R2 server VM in testing on top of > the gluster storage,

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 3 October 2017 at 13:27, Gandalf Corvotempesta < > gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Any update about multiple bugs regarding data corruptions with >> sharding enabled ? >> >> Is 3.12.1 ready to be used in production? >> > >

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > Init.d/system.d script doesn't kill gluster automatically on > reboot/shutdown? > > Sounds less like an issue with how it's shutdown but an issue with how it's mounted perhaps. My gluster fuse mounts seem to handle any one node being shutdown just fine as long as

Is possible to create a dispersed volume 1+2 ? (Almost the same as replica 3, the same as RAID-6) If yes, how many server I have to add in the future to expand the storage? 1 or 3? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170923/a702ba67/attachment.html>

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > I think this should be considered a bug > If you have a server crash, glusterfsd process obviously doesn't exit > properly and thus this could least to IO stop ? I agree with you completely in this.

Already read that. Seems that I have to use a multiple of 512, so 512*(3-2) is 512. Seems fine Il 23 set 2017 5:00 PM, "Dmitri Chebotarov" <4dimach at gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi > > Take a look at this link (under ?Optimal volumes?), for Erasure Coded > volume optimal configuration > > http://docs.gluster.org/Administrator%20Guide/Setting%20Up%20Volumes/ >

Hi to all We have a maildir with about 180GB of emails. We have to archive them to a structure like: .Archive.YYY./MM.folder Are you aware of a script doing this ? I've found a perl script that doesn't spit in year and month and a very, very, very, very, very old python script that: 1) doesn't manage base64 encoded subject properly 2) doesn't work with python 3.x (that is able to

Where did you read 2k IOPS? Each disk is able to do about 75iops as I'm using SATA disk, getting even closer to 2000 it's impossible Il 13 ott 2017 9:42 AM, "Szymon Miotk" <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> ha scritto: > Depends what you need. > 2K iops for small file writes is not a bad result. > In my case I had a system that was just poorly written and it was >

On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:29, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/26/2016 2:38 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta > <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: >> This is much easier than dovecot replication as i can start immedialy with >> no need to upgrade the old server >> >> my only question is: how to manage the email received on the

I'm thinking on how to prove you a sample XVA I have to create (and populate) a VM because an empty image will result in an empty XVA And a VM is 300-400Mb as minimum Il 15 nov 2017 10:30 PM, "Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com> ha scritto: > On 2017-11-15 21:41, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > > 2017-11-15 21:29 GMT+01:00 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>: >

On 06/30/2017 12:40 AM, Renaud Fortier wrote: > > On my nodes, when i use the system.d script to kill gluster (service > glusterfs-server stop) only glusterd is killed. Then I guess the > shutdown doesn?t kill everything ! > Killing glusterd does not kill other gluster processes. When you shutdown a node, everything obviously gets killed but the client does not get notified

Hi, I have a production server running Debian Squeeze with Dovecot 1.2 I would like to upgrade everything to Jessie, running 2.2 Last time I did something similiar, but from Lenny to Squeeze, the whole dovecot installation broke. Any suggestion on how to upgrade everything ? Can I test our current configuration with a newer dovecot version to be sure that everything would be converted properly