similar to: Bug: Shared Mailbox - Case Sensitivity

Hi, Unfortunately it looks like the parameter: "imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep" does not work. Neither inside nor outside "protocol imap {}" configuration section. ACLs are set correctly. Manual "DELETE Public/Test" via telnet is working as expected. Is this a known bug? See: - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Dovecot#Thunderbird -

Hi Anton, Thank you very much for your helpful hint. Thunderbird clearly wants to move Public/Test to the Trash of the user who subscribed the Public folder. Question is how to solve this from a Dovecot point of a view, so a user can also delete folders? 2020200448[10053c700]: proposed url = Public/Test folder for connection INBOX has To Wait = FALSE can run = FALSE 2020200448[10053c700]:

I couldn't find working solutions for this anomalie on the net. What does this mean and does someone know how to fix this? postfix/smtpd[18757]: improper command pipelining after EHLO from unknown[192.168.10.233]: QUIT\r\n Thanks Best Regards, Leander

Thank you for your quick feedback. I added it to my plugins in the config. How can I make sure my mailclients are using it? Is there a way to check this like I can check headers with additional Firefox plug-in you may recomment? Kind regards Leander Am 04.12.15 um 15:30 schrieb Michael Slusarz: > On 12/4/2015 6:11 AM, Leander Sch?fer wrote: > >> With Apache one may use

Hi, With Apache one may use "mod_deflate" in order to reduce bandwidth by using e.g. gzip to compress the http traffic. I would like to use something similar for email traffic between mail clients to dovecote and postfix. My questions are: a) Is this established well enough in most mail clients? b) Can you recomment a good tutorial for this? Thank you very much

Hi, I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm currently using * Clam-SMTP and * SpamAssassin to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd directly. But I more and more wonder wether AmaViS is even worth it?! It currently looks to me as if AmaViS is eating LOTS of

Hi Rowland, do you maybe have any idea what could potentially cause this bug? smbclient thrwos me back a mount error(5): Input/output error when I try to mount the remote smbFS. It doesn't happen with my MacOSx and Windows 7 as client but it happens with Linux OSs and with a Konica Minolta copy machine with a scanner to samba function. The first try to mount fails with the above error.

Hi, something seems wrong with "vfs objects = recycle, streams_xattr". I permanently keep on getting the following errors on the Samba server: Aug 18 11:28:39 Storage-03 smbd[34544]: STATUS=daemon 'smbd' finished starting up and ready to serve connectionsunknown tag type 64 Aug 18 11:28:39 Storage-03 smbd[34544]: [2014/08/18 11:28:39.897763, 0]

Hi I'm using Samba version 4.1.7 on the server side. On the Client side is multiple versions - a copy machine Konica Minolta - Windows XP - Windows 7 - Mac OSx (Mavericks) - CentOS (XenServer) all of them get sporadic input output errors. E.g: on a Linux I would get a mount error(5): Input/output error after the first try. And as funny as it sounds, but the second try is a success and

[EDIT]: Sorry about the second mail. ignore the first one - it had try & and error mistakes in. Problem is still the very same as explaned below. Thanks a lot. Hi, since days I'm trying to substitude my SQL based Postfix/Dovecot mail server by a LDAP based setup. Everything seems to go smooth so far - thanks to the many how to and Dovecot wiki. Unfortunately I'm struggeling,

Hi, recently I see lots of logs like this. I figured, that many have umlaute in their name - but not all. My local FS displays the umlaute correctly - but it is not displayed correctly in the logfiles. Also, when I browse through shares via Windows or MacOSx all files with umlaute seem to be displayed correctly. May 5 08:27:54 Storage-01 smbd[39207]: recycle: stat for

Am 26.01.2015 um 02:13 schrieb Leander Sch?fer: > I just checked my ulimit again and it really seems like it has more > than enough - so I still don't understand what I've configured wrong > here ;/ > > root at WM-01 [~]$ su -m dovecot -c "ulimit -a" > socket buffer size (bytes, -b) unlimited > core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited > data

Hi I keep on getting errors and can't connect/login to Dovecot. I did my research but unfortunately without success. It is for sure not ulimit because ulimit is set to unlimited per default already. Still , it complains about "Too many open files" but this is a test system and the service dovecot and postfix have just been started. No one except me is testing on this system.

Hi sorry to bother, but all of a sudden after a fresh install of samba with the regular smb4.conf it keeps on failing when users try to authenticate: smbclient -U MyUser \\\\MyServerName\\MyShare MyPassword session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL [...] check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [MyUser] -> [MyUser] -> [MyUser] succeeded [2014/05/02 10:29:40.930648, 3]

But then it loops again when get back to the postfix as an incoming message (doesn't know that abcd at localdomain.com is located on that Dovecot) <https://img.newoldstamp.com/r/292975/p> Adam Raszkiewicz p: 845.896.0191 e: araszkiewicz at medallies.com w: www.medallies.com <http://www.medallies.com/main.html> <https://img.newoldstamp.com/r/292975/twitter>

Does someone know what this means? It looks to me like it got the UID, yet it complains ... ? Also, why does it complain about attributes being unused, yet I use prefetch, so they will be used?! Log: [...] dovecot: auth: Debug: ldap(test at mydomain.tld,192.168.10.233,<Rl2CF+UNhgDAqArp>): result: mailStorageDirectory=/var/vmail mailUidNumber=2110 mailGidNumber=2110

Desired flow looks like: Dovecot ---------------------> Postfix --> Relay Server -? Dovecot <-- LMTP/LDA <-- Postfix <---------------------? Top part of that flow works fine - a message will get to the relay server and it will be send back to the postfix for a local delivery but then it will start to loop back to the relay server instead hand over to LMTP/LDA. For some reason

Something I can't quite place finger on here. Altogether too much Mafia, in the bulk email business generally, and I know Switzerland borders on Italy ... This sounds, (albeit vaguely,) altogether too much like the thieves I seem to have fallen amongst lately. Two stolen trucks, three stolen laptops, another one wrecked, three or four stolen cell phones, passwords GPG keys, city hall hookers

Hey Timo, Thanks for the quick turnaround, once we have the test results I'll contact you again. Should I also include instructions on how to run the a self contained server with a dummy backend so you can independently verify our results? Leander Beernaert Proton AG ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, February 23rd, 2023 at 8:59 PM, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com>

I also keep on getting funny errors of dovecot EVEN THOUGH I authenticated successfully through SMTP (Dovecto SASL) ?!?! Just for debugging this entire issue I set those parameters: debug_level = -1 auth_verbose = yes auth_verbose_passwords = yes auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes mail_debug = yes verbose_ssl = yes cat /var/loca/maillog Jan 26 12:08:22 WM-01