similar to: RFC 3501 violation in FETCH BODY responses

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "RFC 3501 violation in FETCH BODY responses"

2012 Feb 02
1
possibly Error in R version 2.12.1 (2010-12-16)
Hi, the following Code demonstrates an possibly Error in R (or you can explain me, why this happens, thanks in advance) Code: ##################################### testClass <- function( stackData= c()) { list( write= function( ...) { sChain= "" for( s in c( stackData, ...)) { sChain= paste( sChain, '"', sub( '"',
2010 Jun 07
0
Announcement before absolute timeout / how to terminate a meetme conf?
Hi, I'm new to asterisk and have a little trouble in developing my first more complex dialplan. The basic task is a click to call solution: - call one number via sip, play some announcements, do cdr etc. and put the callee into an conference room with music on hold - call a second number via sip, play some announcements, do cdr etc. put the callee into the same conference - have a nice chat
2005 Aug 08
1
Help with "non-integer #successes in a binomial glm"
Hi, I had a logit regression, but don't really know how to handle the "Warning message: non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! in: eval(expr, envir, enclos)" problem. I had the same logit regression without weights and it worked out without the warning, but I figured it makes more sense to add the weights. The weights sum up to one. Could anyone give me some hint? Thanks a lot!
2004 Oct 01
1
Dovecot/IMP Bug with RFC822.SIZE and BODYSTRUCTURE
Ok, I have narrowed my IMP/Dovecot attachment problem down to what I think is a bug in Dovecot. The test that follow are performed on 0.99.11. When you download an attachment in IMP it uses the php function imap_fetchbody() which contacts the IMAP server and retrieves just the mime chunk you are looking for. It does this by first fetching some information about the email, and then grabs the
2020 Mar 03
3
[PATCH] lib-imap: imap-bodystructure: add test with empty header field
This causes the body structure to be incorrect. The RFC says it's fine o have empty header field values. --- This just adds a failing test, inspired from an e-mail spotted in the wild. Ideas welcome to fix it. src/lib-imap/test-imap-bodystructure.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/lib-imap/test-imap-bodystructure.c
2015 Sep 08
1
Fetch command response questions
Hello, I have the following issue: When using command? FETCH 2 (BODY.PEEK[HEADER] UID INTERNALDATE FLAGS BODYSTRUCTURE) on 2 different emails, we get 2 different response structure. First response structure contains the BODYSTRUCTURE in a single line, while in the second response, the BODYSTRUCTURE is divided into multiple lines with "{61}" character at the end of each line.
2003 Jan 06
1
Assert in imap-bodystructure.c
First let me thank you for my initial newby question about poping from a pop3 server and delivering into my Dovecot maildir folders. Now I'm getting an assertion in imap-bodystructure.c and one of my imap folders is now inaccessable. I think the two are related. Whenever I select the folder from my email client (kmail) I get two log entries in the dovecot log of the format:
2008 May 15
1
value transformations in a vector
Dear contributors: I have vector A composed of numbers wich have values equal to 1 and different to 1. I want to transform de components with a value=1 to a component of value=0, and those with a value different to1, to a value=1. Then I want to take out the components=0. Thanks in advance, Juan Pablo [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2017 May 02
2
Issue with parsing of forwarded messages with attachments and quotes in the subject
Hi all, at work we use Roundcube acting as a mail client for the Dovecot Imap server. In Roundube the messages are parsed through the Imap BODYSTRUCTURE command If a message contains forwarded messages and attachments and some of the messages contains a quote (") in the subject, then the resulting BODYSTRUCTURE appears to be malformed. --- After some digging through the code of
2004 Feb 10
1
Dovecot and Mulberry
FYI. Does Dovecot implement BODYSTRUCTURE? An eval copy of Mulberry can be downloaded from <http://www.cyrusoft.com/mulberry/>. ------------ Forwarded Message ------------ Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:56 PM +0100 From: Lennart Petersson <lennart at informatik.gu.se> To: mulberry-discuss at cyrusoft.com Subject: Dovecot and Mulberry I've recently changed my imap-server
2017 Oct 06
2
Strange "IMAP connection broken (server response)" errors
Hello, We upgraded one of our dovecot servers to debian stretch with dovecot 2.2.27 and since then one of our users has been experiencing random IMAP failures. We enabled raw logging at the server side and it shows normal IMAP commands/responses: 1507292522.222427 * 6 FETCH (FLAGS () BODYSTRUCTURE ("text" "plain" ("charset" "us-ascii") NIL NIL
2017 Dec 08
3
Mailsploit problem in responce of BODYSTRUCTURE
Hi, I tried to see a mail that have a strange From header in bellow URL: https://www.mailsploit.com/index Then, I got BODYSTRUCTURE response contain next: ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) Are this problem already founded by anyone? So already fixed? -- TACHIBANA Masashi QUALITIA CO., LTD. mailto:tachibana at qualitia.co.jp
2003 Jan 06
1
0.99.6rc1 released
Again rc, just in case I broke something. Or maybe I should just start creating nightly CVS snapshots. Anyway, fixes the few bugs people have reported lately: - Mails with nested MIME parts might have caused incorrect BODY and BODYSTRUCTURE fetches and sometimes might have crashed dovecot (assert at imap-bodystructure.c). If client had already successfully done the BODY fetching a
2006 Sep 11
1
Wrong content-type reported for messages with only a text/html body?
Hi all, It looks like Dovecot 1.0rc7 reports the wrong content-type for messages with only a text/html body. An example of such a message is: --- From: mathijs at izecom.com Subject: test To: foobar at example.com Content-Type: text/html; test --- When I talk IMAP to Dovecot directly using telnet and fetch the bodystructure of this message, Dovecot replies: * 1 FETCH (BODYSTRUCTURE
2009 Jun 01
1
uid fetch error with revision 9112:9d634c93d28a
This command fails: 2 uid fetch somevaliduid (BODYSTRUCTURE BODY.PEEK[]) 2 BAD Error in IMAP command UID: Unknown command BODYSTRUCTURE Thanks, Jonathan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2541 bytes Desc: not available URL:
2017 Dec 11
2
Mailsploit problem in responce of ENVELOPE
Hi, Sorry, It comes by fetching ENVELOPE, not BODYSTRUCTURE. For example: A01 UID FETCH 24 (ENVELOPE) * 4 FETCH (UID 24 ENVELOPE ("Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:44:35 +0900" "test2" ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) (("dev1" NIL "dev1-bounces" "example.com")) ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) (("user1"
2003 Jun 20
1
Bug?
Hi, Been using Dovecot for a few weeks now, must say it's very good.. I've been looking for a 'drop in' replacement for UWImap for ages! :) but just recently It's been giving me a few problem, I haven't tracked down exactly what causes the problem yet (I'm using Apple Mail on OS X 10.2.6) but after a good mail session it keep trying to log in over and over again..
2004 Dec 05
1
0.99.12 released
One change since -rc1 (the last one below). - Fix memory leaks in LDAP, MySQL and PGSQL userdb/passdb - Fix hanging when parsing mails that have over 4096 bytes in one line (SMTP servers normally don't allow over 1000 bytes so it shouldn't be much of a problem) - FETCH BODYSTRUCTURE sometimes gave a wrong reply (eg. with FETCH (BODYSTRUCTURE RFC822.SIZE) if it wasn't
2008 Mar 10
2
Consecutive crashes of serveral imapd processes
This is 1.0.13, the processes crashed a few seconds apart from each other: GNU gdb 6.7.1-debian Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show
2012 Mar 14
4
converting unsigned short sample to signed short sample
Thanks a lot for replying, The question now is , after subtracting 32767 from each unsigned sample, will the new signed samples represent the same original voice ? ???? For explanation, assume "Hi" is said in 8000 unsigned sample ,if i subtract 32767 from each sample and play the resulting 8000 sample as signed PCM samples,will they be "Hi" ?! Forgive me about my questions ,