similar to: LMTP doing passdb queries ?

Refer to https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-March/099971.html https://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase I tried to repeat the same thing. Set these passdb: passdb { args = /myscript.sh ip=%r driver = checkpassword result_failure = return-fail result_success = continue } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext ( my working auth method ) driver = sql } Created

> Am 03.09.2019 um 10:54 schrieb Sami Ketola via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > >> On 3 Sep 2019, at 11.07, R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> as Dovecot supports submission, which is the sending direction, I am interested to know, if I can configure a separate passdb backend just for submission.

> Am 04.09.2019 um 08:24 schrieb Sami Ketola via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > >> On 3 Sep 2019, at 19.08, R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> I tried this, but I have done something wrong probably. >> >> I added this to 20-imap 20-pop 20-managesieve and 20-submission. Always in the protocol sections. I also

On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: > >> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >> >> >>> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:

On 14 Oct 2015, at 00:01, Eric Abrahamsen <eric at ericabrahamsen.net> wrote: > > Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com> writes: > >> Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> >>> Simply: Is it possible to iterate over users if I'm using the >>> passwd-file passdb driver? Do I need a SQL-based driver if I want to >>> iterate? >> >> What

> On 4 Sep 2019, at 16.38, R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> passdb { >> args = /etc/dovecot/master-users >> driver = passwd-file >> master = yes >> pass = yes >> } >> passdb { >> args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext >> driver = ldap >> } >> ... >> protocol sieve { >> passdb

Hi, currently we deploying Dovecot as imap/pop3 proxy. Every few minutes some panic/assert occurred (we connect roughly 7k - 8k user at one imap proxy with a connection rate of 200/s). We activate core dumps. Concerning the sensitive information in the dump we would prefer to not share the dump (e.g. i found our ssl private key in the dump). Log/Stack trace: Mar 30 15:54:06 imap16 dovecot:

Hi folks, According to the wiki,? it's considered a feature of Dovecot and its ability to support multiple authentication sources that "if the password doesn't match in the first database, it checks the next one". ?) http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/MultipleDatabases I think it's great that Dovecot allows auth sources to be stacked like this, but I am not sold on the

> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > > I think, i had the same problem as you. > > > > When dovecot runs lmtp, no user is logged in, so there is no user from > > which you can get groups. So i think, my

I have a new Dovecot v2.2.9 installation and am having trouble getting virtual users recognized. Also, the example configuration listed on the Wiki generates config errors. Note that I haven't tried running dovecot yet, I wanted to verify that the config looked good first. First, my configuration. I'm trying to use /etc/dovecot/users as my combined userdb and passdb file, with all

Hello, we face an issue with the vacation extension of pigeonhole. Our upstream mail server (from which we pull our E-Mails with POP3) uses SPF and performs a SRS re-write of the Return Path. Once the mail is processed via our local postfix, it is delivered via dovecot deliver (using the lda). When the recipient has a vacation rule enabled in sieve, the out-of-office note cannot be sent, as

Dear All, I'm using version 2.1.7 which currently ships with debian stable. I'd like to use userdb { driver = passwd-file args = username_format=%n /etc/dovecot/users default_fields = uid=vmail gid=vmail override_fields = skip = never result_failure = continue result_internalfail = continue result_success = return-ok } from [1]. The error message is: Jan 25

I'm using dovecot in a multi server setup. Two directors forward pop3, imap and smtp to backend dovecots with their central storage on NFS. Yesterday I stumbled upon these log lines: 2019-11-18 20:17:51 lmtp(17274): Info: Connect from 172.22.1.6 2019-11-18 20:17:51 lmtp(17274): Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1142 (smtp_client_connection_established): assertion failed:

Dear all, I experience SegFaults in the imap binary on a LIST "" "" command, as sent by Claws mail. Using LIST "" "INBOX" or similar is fine. Here is an example telnet session $ telnet 127.0.0.1 143 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to 127.0.0.1. Escape character is '^]'. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE

> On 25/08/2020 14:35 Robert Nowotny <rnowotny at rotek.at> wrote: > > > I get ZLIB Errors after dovecot upgrade from 2.3.10.1 to 2.3.11.3 > > > Aug 21 15:27:34 lxc-imap dovecot: imap(acsida)<63870><jZk...>: Error: Mailbox Sent: UID=40826: read(zlib(/home/vmail/virtualmailboxes/acsida/storage/m.2409)) failed:

Hi! ~ dovecot --version 2.2.22 (fe789d2) I am wondering if there is a way to set up virtual users with multiple valid passwords. We want to be able to provide users with device/app-specific passwords for their email accounts, as well as being able to create temporary "access tokens" for technical support when required. I quickly found out that passdb using passwd-file or an

On 29.8.2019 12.30, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: > >> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >> >> >> On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: >>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 28/08/2019 21:01

Dne 07.09.2020 v 12:43 Sami Ketola napsal(a): >> On 7. Sep 2020, at 12.38, Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you

> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:30 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > >> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >> >> >> On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: >>> >>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:

Hi Recently enabled support for encrypted passwords on my proxies - CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, NTLM and APOP to support some new users. Most users are working perfectly though every so often I see this happening in the logs: Jul 09 06:32:51 auth: Error: ldap(user at domain.com,192.168.10.90,<mOWiFi431eDKOsBS>): Multiple password values not supported Jul 09 06:32:51 auth: Panic: file