similar to: Multiple recipient delimiter support?

On 6/2/2016 3:50 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 6/2/2016 10:35 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >> Trying to find out if dovecot supports the use of multiple recipient >> delimiters, as postfix does, but can't find an answer... > > The reason this is important is simple. I've encountered a lot of sites > that

Hello, There is a disconnect between the way Postfix handles recipient_delimiter and the way Dovecot handles it. For Postfix, it is a set of delimiters that can each individually be used to separate the address from the . In Dovecot, having multiple characters in recipient_delimiters simply makes it a multi-character single delimiter. For my purposes, the Postfix method is much more

Since many broken websites and idiot companies will not allow a ?+? in an email address, I have long used two delimiters in postfix: recipient_delimiter = +_ However, now that dovecot is handling verification for postfix via reject_unverified_recipient, dovecot complains about any address using an _ as a delimiter. I don?t see a way to tell dovecot what delimiters to use, and it appears it is

On 20/06/2019 01:20, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > On 18 Jun 2019, at 15:03, @lbutlr via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> I don?t see a way to tell dovecot what delimiters to use, and it appears it is still using a single delimiter only despite postfix having added support for more than one years ago. > Ideas? There is the recipient_delimiter setting. For recent

I read in the list archives about work in progress on an lmtp delivery agent.As a previous cyrus user where that was the preferred delivery method from postfix, this sounds interesting. I was wondering whether it will handle recipient delimiters. ie will it be able to map user+foo at example.com to user at example.com? I'm not interested in the delivery into folder stuff, just the plain

On 12/16/2017, 5:10:14 AM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > Op 12/14/2017 om 6:07 PM schreef Tanstaafl: >> One other point. >> >> Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add >> support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used. >> >> Stephan, are you sure there is no (fairly simple) way to

> On September 26, 2016 at 4:14 PM Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > > On 9/19/2016 11:26 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > >> On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: > >>> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension

> On 28 Oct 2016, at 16.54, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/27/2016 8:36 AM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >> On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:29, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >>> On 10/26/2016 2:38 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta >>>> my only question is: how to manage the email received on the new server

On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 6/14/2016 6:50 PM, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >> Where exactly does dovecot get the date that it reports via IMAP? > > This is a problem with how you restored the files. > > On a linux system, you should use something like rsync -a to preserve > the original

> On 31 Oct 2016, at 13.11, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/30/2016 5:32 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> On 28 Oct 2016, at 16.54, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >>> Oh... I thought the --useuid option eliminated this problem? >>> >>>

On Nov 22, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > I'm trying for the life of me to see a use case for anywhere close to > 1,000 folders, and am failing. That would be a major problem just from > the human side. How do you find anything? I can see it, though I think it?s excessive. List Mail Dovecot 2011-06 2011-07 2011-08 ?

On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:29, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/26/2016 2:38 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta > <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: >> This is much easier than dovecot replication as i can start immedialy with >> no need to upgrade the old server >> >> my only question is: how to manage the email received on the

Finally have some time to review list emails... On Tue Sep 04 2018 03:41:50 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > imapsync always loses data. Hi Sami, Can you expand on this? I used ImapSync to migrate from Dovecot to Office365 a couple of years ago, and didn't notice any issues with it at all.

On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named >> Searches (Filters)) or if there is any plan about it. > I have a partial implementation in my patch queue. I haven't worked on > it for a few months now due to other projects that took

On Wed Aug 23 2017 08:57:27 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Sebastian Arcus <s.arcus at open-t.co.uk> wrote: > On 23/08/17 09:11, mca at caloro.ch wrote: >> On Wed Aug 23 2017 12:07:03 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), >> Rupert Gallagher <ruga at protonmail.com> wrote: >>> Please witch add-on possibilities exist to synchronize the Calednar with >>>

On Jun 15, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 6/15/2016 12:30 PM, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >> On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >>> On 6/14/2016 6:50 PM, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >>>> Where exactly does dovecot get the date that it reports

Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> writes: >> Is this what you are looking for? >> >> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailboxAlias >> >> It seems already be implemented... > > A first step maybe, but no, not quite. So what are the gotchas of using this? How much does this free lunch cost? Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>

Hi! As a new user, I'm trying to set up a postfix + dovecot combination, and so far all is running smoothly. I'm using the guidelines that came with postfix and adjusting them as I go. My user and alias database is stored in MySQL, using the scheme from 'PostfixAdmin' (http://high5.net/page9.html) and I am using the dovecot LDA 'deliver' to drop messages into mailboxes

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:14:02 -0500 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 11/17/2016 10:58 AM, Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote: > > I have over 620K emails in over 1000 folders. This turns Thunderbird > > into an all day affair, just to refresh its caches. > > There are lots of knobs you can tweak to improve the situation, but >

Hello, I have a forum system which can potentially have users send email to it for posting purposes that arrives addressed to a particular user account with a recipient delimiter: user+1a2b3c4d5e6f at domain.com The forum server is supposed to check the "user" account mailbox's inbox for the messages and post them to the site automatically. This doesn't work right now