Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "doveadm-server protocol change?"
2016 Feb 12
2
Segmentation fault on doveadm search -A with a huge user base
Hi,
I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 with a director/backend setup. The user base is
about 4711 users currently.
If I start at one of the directors
doveadm search -A all savedbefore 5000d
it terminates with
doveadm(1rrissma): Error: doveadm server disconnected before handshake: EOF
doveadm(1rrissma): Error: 2001:638:913:f33::5:ff:24245: Command search failed for 1phaaman: EOF
2016 Apr 27
3
Crash: setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL)
Hi,
Using 2.2.9 (ubuntu 14.04 LTS) and sending the following command,
the server crashes when I try to delete an annotation:
? login ?
C: 2 setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL)
Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<heiko>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=6651, secured
Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1
2016 May 30
2
doveadm-server protocol change?
Hi Aki,
thank your for responding that fast.
aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 17:49:53 CEST):
?
> Hi! This has been fixed in 2.2.24. There was a bug in user passing.
Ok, thus at least your answer saves me hours of debugging. We upgraded
old Ubuntu Boxes (14.04/LTS) to 16.04 to get around some Dovecot
limitations/problems. And now we got new ones :(
We
2015 Oct 11
2
dovecot as proxy and verification of the backends certificate
Hello,
I'm using a dovecot as proxy, connecting to one or more backends.
The backends use X.509 certificates.
The proxy's passdb returns
extra fields:
user=foo
proxy
host=backend1.<domain>
ssl=yes
nopassword=y
Thus the proxy connects to the backend but can't verify the backends
certificate.
The following comment suggests using ssl_client_ca_file for
2016 Jun 28
2
dsync unstable? (other strange detail)
Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> (Mi 29 Jun 2016 00:00:11 CEST):
?
> >> b) UID=16 suddenly appeared on Cyrus side even though it wasn't there earlier. This isn't allowed by IMAP standard.
> It's still strange if Cyrus is doing that. It's generally a pretty well behaving IMAP server. What version is it?
* OK srvlx Cyrus IMAP4 v2.2.12 server ready
Maybe, did you read
2016 Feb 11
3
LMTP proxy does not pass RCPT TO: ... 5xx response back
Hello,
I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 and a director/backend setup.
On the director I've the LMTP in proxy mode, mapping the users to one of
the backends.
The backends to quota check and return the OverQuota message already at
RCPT TO time.
Here is what I typed, connected to the director
Connection to director1 2525 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
220 director1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot
2016 Apr 27
2
Crash: setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL)
On 27.04.2016 11:00, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> ? login ?
>> C: 2 setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL)
>>
>> Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<heiko>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=6651, secured
>> Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap(heiko):
2016 May 30
4
doveadm-server protocol change?
> On May 30, 2016 at 10:26 PM Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> wrote:
>
>
> Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 21:18:09 CEST):
> > Hi Aki,
> >
> > aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST):
> > ?
> > > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/,
2015 Oct 13
3
TLS communication director -> backend with X.509 cert checks?
Hello,
using Dovecot 2.2.9 and a setup with directors and backends.
The communication between directors and backends needs to be TLS
secured.
The director config contains a list of hostnames for the backends.
(implicit list because of multiple A/AAAA records for a single hostname
or explicit list of several host names)
On connection setup from a client the director connects to the
selected
2016 Nov 21
2
Exim still accepting emails to nonexistent users
Hi,
Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mo 21 Nov 2016 11:50:13 CET):
> a) Routing stage
> You need to interact with the user database dovecot uses.
> Either you access the user database directory (flat file, LDAP,
> whatever) or you use the ${readsocket?} feature of Exim to talk to
> dovecot.
The readsocket trick doesn't seem to work anymore.
Using
$
2015 Oct 13
2
TLS communication director -> backend with X.509 cert checks?
Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> (Di 13 Okt 2015 21:36:40 CEST):
?
> > I see:
> >
> > a) pass the host *names* to the director too, for CN verification
> > purpose
> >
> > May be in struct mail_host could be a field for the original
> > hostname we used to obtain the adress(es)?
>
> Does the attached patch work? Compiles,
2016 Jun 28
2
dsync unstable? (other strange detail)
Hi,
Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> (Di 28 Jun 2016 23:30:38 CEST):
> >
> > On successive runs of the above command I get:
> >
> > dsync(heiko): Warning: Deleting mailbox 'Serververwaltung.Mailinglisten Anforderung': UID=16 GUID= is missing locally
>
> This means that on Dovecot side there are messages after UID=16, but either:
> a) UID=16 was
2015 Oct 13
2
TLS communication director -> backend with X.509 cert checks?
Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mi 14 Okt 2015 00:10:50 CEST):
> Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> (Di 13 Okt 2015 23:49:20 CEST):
> ?
> >
> > Proxying in general does check that hostname matches the SSL certificate, because both the hostname and IP address are sent to login process. So it should work in a way that host=<hostname> and
2015 Nov 12
2
How to Restore emails
Hi,
Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> (Do 12 Nov 2015 23:31:39 CET):
> According to a message to this list from Oli Schacher,
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-June/059493.html, all I need to do is copy the deleted
> emails to their original folder and dovecot will take care of it:
>
?
> > exactly, just copy the mail from your backup back into the users
> >
2017 Jul 09
3
STARTTLS issue with sieve
Am 08.07.2017 um 23:10 schrieb Heiko Schlittermann:
> As it seem, Pigeonhole sends you the full cert chain:
>
>> *** Starting TLS handshake
>> - Certificate type: X.509
>> - Got a certificate list of 3 certificates.
>> - Certificate[0] info:
>> - subject `C=DE,ST=Baden-Wuerttemberg,L=Ettlingen,O=NOVA Elektroanlagen
> ?
>> - Certificate[2] info:
2016 May 31
2
Ubuntu package - Was: Re: doveadm-server protocol change?
Hi,
Peter Chiochetti <pch at myzel.net> (Di 31 Mai 2016 10:31:50 CEST):
> Not having installed any of the two, I can say, as a Ubuntu user:
> In ppa "/etc/init.d/dovecot" is a symlink to "/lib/init/upstart-job"
The 2.2.24 on 16.04 installs both
/etc/init.d/dovecot
/lib/systemd/system/dovecot.service
> While xi packages places its own init script
2016 May 30
2
doveadm-server protocol change?
Hi Aki,
aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST):
?
> You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem.
Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try
the xi.dovecot.fi packages.
With 2.2.24 it works as expected. Due to the project state I'll
2017 Oct 25
6
authenticate as userA, but get authorization to user userB's account
Hello,
given a small organization. There are *personal* mailboxes (mailbox per
user, incl. subfolders et cetera). The users can share specic folders
via the ACL (we call it "other users/", Dovecot calls it "shared"
folder. Additionally there are mailboxes Dovecot calls "public" (we use
the term "groups/"). They are not associated with a specific account,
2016 Nov 16
2
Exim still accepting emails to nonexistent users
After adding the configuration bit:
deny
message = invalid recipient
domains = +local_domains
!verify = recipient/callout=no_cache
from: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP/Exim <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP/Exim> running update-exim4.conf and service exim4 restart
the server is still accepting emails to recipients that do not exist in dovecot.
Any ideas?
2016 Nov 21
2
Exim still accepting emails to nonexistent users
Hi Heiko,
Here is the router:
virtual_aliases:
driver = redirect
debug_print = "R: Check address using virtual_aliases for $local_part@$domain"
allow_fail
allow_defer
hide data = CHECK_VIRTUAL_ALIASES
user = vmail
group = mail
local_user:
debug_print = "R: local_user for $local_part@$domain"
driver = accept