similar to: Replication issues master <-> master nfs backend

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Replication issues master <-> master nfs backend"

2016 Jul 11
3
Master-Master replication question
Quoting "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml at o-sinc.com>: > You are not alone! > > On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 01:15:34 PM Remko Lodder wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send >> email >> over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin >> way of sending
2014 Feb 24
1
A question regarding doveadm replicator status
Hello, I am using Dovecot version 2.2.10. I am quite familiar with ssh replication and I managed to set it up correctly. The only problem I see is that when i run the command: doveadm replicator status I get a wrong "Total number of known users" which is a) is different between the two (2) replicated dovecot servers, i.e. in mail1 I get a total of 21 users and in mail2 I get a total of
2016 Jul 11
3
Master-Master replication question
Quoting Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: >> On 11 Jul 2016, at 17:36, Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com> wrote: >> >> Quoting "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml at o-sinc.com>: >> >>> You are not alone! >>> >>> On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 01:15:34 PM Remko Lodder wrote: >>>> Dear list, >>>>
2016 Jul 06
3
Master-Master replication question
Dear list, I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send email over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin way of sending mail to both master servers. I found out, that on one of the two machines, the email synchronisation is heavily delayed. Lets assume server A receives a mail from the MX; it synchronises almost instantly with the other
2009 Aug 25
3
Two server certificates for two common names
Hi there! I have two DNS records mail1.domain.tld mail2.domain.tld I have issued SSL server Certificates for both my domain names. Is it possible to tell dovecot to use both , depending on client access; clients using the mail1.domain.tld be served by the mail1.domain.tld .key and .cert and those using mail2.domain.tld be served by the mail2.domain.tld .key and .cert Thanks in advance
2019 Apr 11
2
High availability of Dovecot
Gerald Galster via dovecot schrieb: > mail1.yourdomain.com <http://mail1.yourdomain.com> IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail2.yourdomain.com <http://mail2.yourdomain.com>?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > > mail1/mail2 is for
2015 Feb 12
2
Dovecot dsync not replicating ".dovecot.sieve -> .sieve/managesieve.sieve" / setactive
Hello, I've ran into problem with Dovecot and dsync replication. Everything works perfectly, including replication of sieve scripts, except fact that if user activates the 'managesieve' ruleset (I'm using currently Roundcubemail) on "mail1" host, it wouldn't be activated on "mail2" host, by creating symlink ".dovecot.sieve ->
2017 Jan 02
2
multiple shared/mail format namespaces
Hi, Are configurations (with separate formats per namespace) - such as ... namespace { type = shared list = children inbox = no separator = / subscriptions = no prefix = shared1/%%n/ location = maildir:/var/mail1/%%n/ } namespace { type = shared list = children inbox = no separator = / subscriptions = no prefix = shared2/%%n/ location =
2006 Jun 20
4
Mailers and records MX
I've installed bind on centos 4.3.. This is a part of my config file: example.com. IN MX 10 mail.example.com. example.com. IN MX 15 mail1.example.com. example.com. IN MX 20 mail2.example.com. mail.example.com. IN A IP mail.example.com. IN A IP
2010 Dec 01
2
Virtual folder root cannot be opened, virtual folders ok
I am running dovecot 1.2.16 and not able to figure out an error that happens whenever I select the root of a virtual mailbox tree. At the moment I have a simple maildir store, accessed via IMAP, and have successfully added a virtual fs namespace with two subdirectories. I have created dovecot-virtual entries in the subdirs and they are working fine; they show the expected messages, etc. My
2010 Aug 21
1
dsync and active-active fault tolerance mail servers
I would like to set up an active-active fault tolerance couple of mail servers. Is the following procedure correct? Let's suppose I want to set up two servers for acme.com, mail1.acme.com and mail2.acme.com I declare both servers as MX in DNS configuration. Mailbox are stored in maildir with a single UID/GID owner for all the maildir files Userbase is MySQL, user tables are replicated
2013 Jun 05
1
partionning users among backends
Hi I face growing load on a mailserver, and I would like to spread the load on multiple machines. I made a first attempt with dsync but got burnt with issues with mbox, therefore now I am looking for another safer approach. Partitionning users on multiple backends would address my load problem. I would have 50% of users on mail1.example.net and 50% on mail2.example.net, but I need to correctly
2007 Aug 20
1
Couldn't init INBOX: BUG: Unknown internal error
hi, I'm getting quite a few of these in the logs of our new dovecot mail server: Aug 20 09:50:03 mail2 dovecot: POP3(vwc406): Couldn't init INBOX: BUG: Unknown internal error Aug 20 09:50:03 mail2 dovecot: POP3(vwc406): Mailbox init failed top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/0, size=0 we migrated from courier and other mailboxes work. any idea what the cause might be or how I can fix it?
2020 Aug 14
3
replicator: Panic: data stack: Out of memory
So nobody has any idea why this could happen? Let me know if I should provide more Information Thanks Thomas Tsiakalakis Team Applikationsbetrieb GDV Dienstleistungs-GmbH Tel: +49(40)33449-4318 Fax: E-Mail: Thomas.Tsiakalakis at gdv-dl.de<mailto:Thomas.Tsiakalakis at gdv-dl.de> GDV Dienstleistungs-GmbH Glockengie?erwall 1 D-20095 Hamburg www.gdv-dl.de<http://www.gdv-dl.de>
2011 Dec 20
8
ocfs2 - Kernel panic on many write/read from both
Sorry i don`t copy everything: TEST-MAIL1# echo "ls //orphan_dir:0000"|debugfs.ocfs2 /dev/dm-0|wc debugfs.ocfs2 1.6.4 5239722 26198604 246266859 TEST-MAIL1# echo "ls //orphan_dir:0001"|debugfs.ocfs2 /dev/dm-0|wc debugfs.ocfs2 1.6.4 6074335 30371669 285493670 TEST-MAIL2 ~ # echo "ls //orphan_dir:0000"|debugfs.ocfs2 /dev/dm-0|wc debugfs.ocfs2 1.6.4 5239722 26198604
2010 May 31
6
Voicemail : mail attachment to multiple mail-addresses
Hello list, google returns a discussion on the dev-list when I search for how to mail a voicemail to multiple mail addresses. Is there yet a seperator that actually works to define multiple mail addresses ? Kind regards, Jonas. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2016 Jul 09
4
passdb {driver = shadow args = override_username=%variable}
Hello list I want to implement override_username = %variable for the "shadow" driver, so that the following works: passdb { driver = shadow args = override_username=%Ln } by "%variable", I mean "Variables" at http://wiki.dovecot.org/Variables. I've hacked up a solution with strtok(3C), but that's a hack and a possible security hole, and I'd rather
2018 Oct 12
2
Sieve scripts not replicated
Hello, I use dovecot replication and the sieve scripts are not replicated. Mail replication is working fine. Log when sieve script (with Rainloop webmail) is created: Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot: managesieve-login: Login: user=<hativ at example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=91.67.174.186, lip=195.201.251.57, mpid=5360, TLS, session=<OXvK9QV4fOBbQ666> Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot:
2019 Apr 11
0
High availability of Dovecot
> Am 11.04.2019 um 11:48 schrieb luckydog xf <luckydogxf at gmail.com>: > > As your statement, nothing speical is needed to do except setting up DNS MX records, right? MX records are for incoming MAIL: yourdomain.com <http://yourdomain.com/> IN MX 100 mail1.yourdomain.com <http://server1.yourdomain.com/> yourdomain.com <http://yourdomain.com/> IN MX 100
2019 Apr 11
8
High availability of Dovecot
Hi, list, I'm going to deploy postfix + dovecot + CephFS( as Mail Storage). Basically I want to use two servers for them, which is kind of HA. My idea is that using keepalived or Pacemaker to host a VIP, which could fail over the other server once one is down. And I'll use Haproxy or Nginx to schedule connections to one of those server based on source IP( Session stickiness),