similar to: sieve - editheader - edit in place

On 08-09-16 20:51, @lbutlr wrote: > On Tue Sep 06 2016 07:25:38 Hajo Locke <hajo.locke at gmx.de> said >> How to solve this case and find a string in arbitrary/unknown headerline? > > You?ll have to create multiple sieves covering the possible headers. > Maybe when you tell what you're trying to achieve, we can give you better advice. Almost no one is looking for

Hey folks, ive already made a bug report in the gentoo bugtracker last year. In the meantime after some releases the error persists with the current dovecot and pigeonhole versions. Please see my bug report at gentoo mailinglist: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Okay, here are some informations: Steps to Reproduce: add "editheader" to sieve options or

Hi Everybody, I'm using dovecot 2.1.14 from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ with debian squeeze stable. In general, sieve works fine for me, but "addheader :last ..." from the editheader extension causes a crash when it processes a message. I was able to narrow this down a bit: It only happens if "addheader :last" is the first editheader command executed in a script.

In order to simplify auto-response suppression and other filtering, I want to synthesise an Auto-Submitted header on notification mails that should have them but do not. In a sieve file I add the following: if anyof ( header :contains ["From","Sender"] ?info at example.com" ) { if header :contains "Subject" [" just joined "," just left

I've done extensive searches, and there is virtually no information about actual implementations of the draft Sieve Editheader Extension (which provides 'addheader' and 'deleteheader' actions): http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-editheader-11.txt Is anyone currently working on this for Dovecot Sieve? If not, are there any plans to do so? And before I

Hello list, have a problem with sieve script. I want to perform an action if an arbitrary headerline contains a defined string. I tried with regex: if header :regex [".*"] ["searchstri.*"] { fileinto "junk"; } This is not working because regex is only used in 2nd argument ["searchstri.*"] In 1st argument [".*"] no regex is used, sieve

Hello Stephan, I love to use the vacation extension to build an echo service. I have not to worry about whether to answer or not if the sender is a list, postmaster, mailer-daemon or other crasy thing. But i like to echo the *complete headers* back. I did not found a solution with sieve yet. Is it really impossible? Thanks Andreas

I know this is a tad tangential to dovecot, but maybe someone has some pointers for me. I'm trying to forward emails using the sieve filtering and redirect doesn't do it because it doesn't wrap the message in a new email, instead, it seems to just change the envelope From (and To). This causes the outbound relay to reject the message for security/spam reasons (forged From). It

Hi all, I've just migrated my mail system from procmail to managesieve/sieve and I'm having trouble trying to duplicate a could of rules I used to use in my procmail config. One particular rule would be this: :0 Wfh * ^Sender: owner-scientific-linux-devel at LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV | (sed -e '/^Subject:/ s/\[SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL\] *//g'| sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/Precedence:

Hi, We're using Dovecot 2.1.16 with Pigeonhole 0.3.4. Mail is delivered by exim4 to the dovecot LDA. Sometimes users are unable to delete headers. I've narrowed the problem down to preceding the deleteheader command with a query against the body. A simple example: """ require ["body", "editheader", "fileinto"]; if body :contains

Hi, Could you please advice how I can replace envelope of a message received on my server? Best would be using sieve. Simple case - email A at example.com ?receives message, which I&#39;d like to repack into new envelope (I want to have control what values in the envelope will be there - from, to, replay-to et.c) and send to B at test.com . At first I wanted to use editheader

Given a message itht he headers: Subject: This is the subject: X-Foo: bar how would I do the following: 1) Add the contents of X-Foo to subject Subject: [bar] This is the subject 2) replicate the X-Foo header into X-temp X-temp: X-foo-bar -- THE PRESIDENT DID IT IS NOT AN EXCUSE Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF05

Hello. We have currently set dovecot.sieve to insert the text "[SPAM]" at the beginning of an e-mail's subject when it's X-Spam-Score is above 80%. After we set our system as stated the following errors occur: 1) When an e-mail's subject contains control characters like [Ctrl+V|^V], dovecot.sieve terminates with an error and an e-mail is not able to be sent. When a MIME

Full_Name: Emmanuel Paradis Version: 2.1.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (193.49.41.105) read.fwf(..., header = TRUE) does not work properly since: 1/ the original header is printed on the console and not in FILE; 2/ the different 'parts' of the header should be separated with tabs to work with the call to read.table. Here is a suggested fix for src/library/utils/R/read.fwf.R:

Server: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit There seems to be an incompatibility when compiling Pigeonhole against Dovecot v2.2.13.rc1. # make check with Pigeonhole throws up the following error message: <snip> Test case: ./tests/extensions/editheader/addheader.svtest: 1: Test 'Addheader - first' SUCCEEDED 2: Test 'Addheader - last' SUCCEEDED 3: Test 'Addheader - framed'

Hi all, I want to add a custom header to incoming emails from a particular sender. This is what my user Sieve script looks like: require ?editheader?; if address :is "From? ?special-sender at example.com? { addheader ?X-My-Custom-Header? ?Header Value"; } I have enabled the editheader extension in my Dovecot configuration: plugin { ? sieve_extensions = +editheader }

Hello! Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) --------------------------------------------------------------- managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope

Op 3/3/2018 om 9:15 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: >> Hello! >> > We're looking into it. Right, this is not reproducible in the test suite, but I can reproduce it when I replicate your setup. Regards, Stephan. >> Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) >> Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) >> >> After the update to pigeonhole

Well, progress. At least now editheader loads. Sadly that brings up new errors. specified field name `Reply-To:' is invalid. if header :contains "List-id" "<users.spamassassin.apache.org>" { addheader "Reply-To:" "<users.spamassassin.apache.org>"; addheader "X-added-reply-To:" "True"; fileinto :create

Before I spend a lot of time trying to replicate a procmail script that automatically sorts list mail into mailboxes based on the List-ID header (and possibly some other data) I thought I'd check if someone had already done this for sieve. Basically, what I do now in procmail is 1. Get the listname from the List-ID header (or List-post/List-owner if no ID) 2. check against a list of