Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "TLS handshake issue"
2018 Nov 14
3
different TLS protocols on different ports
Hello,
I'm providing IMAP+Starttls on port 143 for users with legacy MUA. So I've to enable TLS1.0 up to TLS1.3
For IMAPS / port 993 I like to enable TLS1.2 and TLS1.3 only.
Is this possible with dovecot-2.2.36 / how to setup this?
Thanks for suggestions,
Andreas
2018 Oct 06
1
TLS handshake failure - Client Helo rejected
Hi,
I can no longer connect to Dovecot (IMAP). The connection is terminated
by Dovecot after Client Helo.
My server:
Dovecot 2.3.3
Debian buster/sid
Architecture: ppc
My problems started in late August after upgrading Dovecot.
SSL settings:
ssl_dh = </etc/ssl/dh2048.pem
ssl_min_protocol = TLSv1.2
ssl_cipher_list =
2014 Jan 14
1
SSL/TLS handshake stays forever without timeout
Hi,
I am a system admin and I am evaluating using dovecot as our email server. In my test, I found that if I telneted to 993 port and did not do anything or I telneted to 143 port, sent starttls command and then did not do anything, the connection stayed forever without timeout. This will make our mail server vulnerable to DOS attack. I dig into dovecot Wiki and did not find any solution. This
2017 Aug 21
6
pop 110/995, imap 143/993 ?
If I read this correctly, starttls will fail due to the MITM attack. That is the client knows security has been compromised. Using SSL/TLS, the MITM can use SSL stripping. Since most Postifx conf use "may" for security, the message would go though unencrypted. Correct???
Is there something to enable for perfect forward security with starttls?
? Original Message ?
From: s.arcus at
2014 Sep 10
1
Dovecot can't read mail, creates duplicate directories
CentOS 6.5, dovecot 2.0.9-7
I used http://www.linuxmail.info/postfix-dovecot-ldap-centos-5/ to
configure LDAP authentication for postfix and dovecot.
I can log in to dovecot via IMAP, but it cannot read messages. It does
wind up creating alternate directories though:
[joliver at localhost ~]$ sudo ls -l /var/vmail/
total 8
drwx------. 3 vmail vmail 4096 Sep 10 15:00 testuser1
drwx------. 3
2010 Mar 29
2
Problem with IMAP on port 993
This is probably a misconfiguration of my MUA; however, I thought I
would ask here first.
I am using IMAP with Dovecot. Claws-mail is my MUA. Now, when fetching
mail via port 143, everything works fine:
Mar 29 10:33:00 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<user at domain.net>, method=CRAM-MD5, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, TLS
However, when I attempt to fetch mail via port 993, I get this
2014 Jun 26
1
TLS/SSL for Win8 & Outlook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Adi Kriegisch wrote:
>
>>> I am struggling with the same issue for some time now: win8/outlook isn't
>>> able to connect to dovecot 2.2.9 (from Debian/backports); the error on the
>>> outlook side of things is 0x800CCC0E which is really helpful.
>>
>> A listing of all of Window's
2014 May 07
1
TLS/SSL for Win8 & Outlook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello
I recently upgraded to dovecot 2.1.7 (as supplied with Debian Weezy).
All clients work as expected except for Outlook (2013 &2010) on Win8
with a SSL/TLS connection. (Thunderbird on Win8 and Outlook 2013 on
Win 7 works fine. On my previous dovecot version 1.2.13 all clients
worked.)
As far as I understand, one difference is the support for
2018 Nov 14
3
different TLS protocols on different ports
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>> I'm providing IMAP+Starttls on port 143 for users with legacy MUA. So
>> I've to enable TLS1.0 up to TLS1.3 For IMAPS / port 993 I like to
>> enable TLS1.2 and TLS1.3 only.
>>
>> Is this possible with dovecot-2.2.36 / how to setup this?
>
> Not possible I'm afraid.
("Not possible" = challenge!)
2011 Feb 02
1
STARTTLS problem
Hi,
We try to configure dovecot as usual (all our servers have
dovecot+vpopmail+qmail or postfix).
We set up dovecot with the next outcome:
- imap ok
- imaps ok
- imap STARTTLS NOT OK
Debug:
root at s13:/home/lucas# gnutls-cli --starttls -p 143 ip
Resolving 'ip'...
Connecting to 'ip'...
- Simple Client Mode:
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID
2012 Jan 11
3
proxy, managesieve and ssl?
Hello,
On a dovecot 2.0.14 proxy, I found that proxying managesieve works well
when using 'starttls' option in pass_attrs, but does not work when using
'ssl' option. The backend server is also dovecot 2.0.14; when using the
ssl option, it reports "no auth attempts" in the logs about
managesieve-login, and meanwhile the MUA, Thunderbird with sieve plugin,
reports
2007 Apr 10
1
"TLS handshake" errors, frozen IMAP
Another new issue has cropped up with my rc1 -> rc31 upgrade:
This morning, right around the typical morning email surge, Dovecot
stopped accepting new IMAP connections. I didn't get a chance to do
much troubleshooting and a restart of Dovecot fixed it. The only
thing I've been able to find in the logs is a bunch of entries like
this one:
Apr 10 09:11:36 cliff dovecot: imap-login:
2018 Dec 18
4
Apple mail fails with Submission
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 18 December 2018 at 02:30 Adi Pircalabu via dovecot <
<a href="mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org">dovecot@dovecot.org</a>> wrote:
</div>
2006 Aug 16
1
help debugging TLS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
i've built dovecot latest cvs on OSX 10.4.7. i'm making a 1st attempt @
trying/failing to get TLS operation up-n-running ...
my install's OK:
Install prefix ...................... : /usr/local/dovecot
File offsets ........................ : 64bit
I/O loop method ..................... : poll
File change notification method
2018 Dec 18
3
Apple mail fails with Submission
Postfix debug peer logging
Dec 18 17:08:11 mail postfix/submission/smtpd[10626]: >
server.example.org[XX.XX.XX.XX]:
250 2.1.5 Ok
Dec 18 17:08:11 mail postfix/submission/smtpd[10626]: watchdog_pat:
0x55ef4ec020180
Dec 18 17:08:11 mail postfix/submission/smtpd[10626]: vstream_fflush_some:
fd 10 flush 28
Dec 18 17:08:11 mail postfix/submission/smtpd[10626]:
vstream_buf_get_ready: fd 10 got 15
Dec
2017 Aug 21
2
pop 110/995, imap 143/993 ?
Lest anyone think STARTTLS MITM doesn't happen,
https://threatpost.com/eff-calls-out-isps-modifying-starttls-encryption-commands/109325/3/
Not only for security, I prefer port 993/995 as it's just plain simpler
to initiate SSL from the get-go rather than to do some handshaking that
gets you to the same point.
Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>
2020 Jun 23
1
Apple mail works but thunderbird unable to connect
I disabled postscreen and enabled logging, I have all ports working except
993, in log when I try to connect on port 993
dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>,
rip=10.244.0.24, lip=10.244.0.108, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed:
error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number,
session=<rEH6ocGoOtUK9AAY>
I found that I could
2016 Jan 20
2
sieve and authentication
when i telnet to the sieve instance running with dovecot, i see that
SASL is supported, but i cannot get thunderbird to connect to the sieve
instance. it seems that i am not providing the right auth methods for
sieve to work.
"IMPLEMENTATION" "Dovecot Pigeonhole"
"SIEVE" "fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress
2020 Jul 19
3
I need some help with my Dovecot and Postfix configs - I'm unable to log in on my mail server
Postconf: https://pastebin.com/vTVn2UMr
Doveconf: https://pastebin.com/nEpZrpzB
all my logs from mail.(warn,err,info,log): https://pastebin.com/ccEVUqyd
my messges log: https://pastebin.com/cXaEBmcH
I'm not sure if you meant this about dict_nis_init but I've done what's
explained here:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/244199/postfix-mail-logs-keep-showing-nis-domain-not-set
2009 Jan 15
3
Enforcing STARTTLS for all mechs while disabling imaps
Hi all,
Is there a way to enforce STARTTLS for all connections, regardless their
authentication mechanism? disable_plaintext_auth only takes care of the auth
conversation, but I would like to have all communication encrypted.
As far as I can see, this would only be possible when using imaps and
disabling imap. However, I would like to have the other way around;
disabling imaps and using imap for