similar to: user password in mail-filter plugin

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "user password in mail-filter plugin"

2016 Feb 04
2
user password in mail-filter plugin
Am 04.02.2016 um 17:43 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 04 Feb 2016, at 03:44, Thomas M?hle <thomas at bitkomplex.de> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I would like to use the users password within a mail-filter script. >> Dovecots %w variable is only available within dovecot-auth, is there any >> way to access the password for a mail-filter? > > Something
2016 Feb 04
5
user password in mail-filter plugin
Am 04.02.2016 um 20:54 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 04 Feb 2016, at 19:41, Thomas M?hle <thomas at bitkomplex.de> wrote: >> >> Am 04.02.2016 um 17:43 schrieb Timo Sirainen: >>> On 04 Feb 2016, at 03:44, Thomas M?hle <thomas at bitkomplex.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I would like to use the users password
2011 Jan 16
5
Smart IMAP proxying with imapc storage
I just committed a very early initial implementation of "imapc" storage backend to v2.1 hg: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1 You can't really do anything except open INBOX and read mails from it, so it's currently only intended for initial testing. It sucks in many ways right now, but I'll be improving it. The idea is that you could set for example: mail_location =
2016 Mar 31
3
mail filter plugin script doesn't effective
output of *dovecot --version*: Dovecot version : 2.2.9 ----- output of *doveconf -n:* auth_debug = yes > > auth_mechanisms = plain login > > auth_verbose = yes > > disable_plaintext_auth = no > > mail_debug = yes > > mail_location = > maildir:/var/mail/vhosts/%d/%n:LAYOUT=fs:DIRNAME=dovecot_maildir > > mail_plugins = " mail_log notify mail_filter"
2018 Mar 02
3
Sieve filter fileinto doesn't preserve flags
Using `fileinto` to move a mail into another mailbox removes flags that have been set with a previous sieve filter with `addflag`. # 2.2.33.2 (d6601f4ec): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.21 (92477967) # OS: Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.1 ext4 lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes mail_debug = yes mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n
2018 Mar 02
4
Sieve filter imapflags with "flagvar" not working
Following the rfc5232, Sieve Email Filtering: Imap4flags Extension the following filter doesn't work when the `"flagvar"` part is added require "imap4flags"; if header :contains "X-Spam" "Yes" { ? setflag "flagvar" "spam"; } removing the `"flagvar"` part works as expected # 2.2.33.2 (d6601f4ec):
2018 Mar 05
1
Sieve filter imapflags with "flagvar" not working
tried also with `require "variables"` doesn't seem to work, the flag is not added at all On 03/03/2018 09:54 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 3/2/2018 om 6:09 PM schreef Konstantinos Tsakiltzidis: >> Following the rfc5232, Sieve Email Filtering: Imap4flags Extension >> >> the following filter doesn't work when the `"flagvar"` part is added >>
2013 Sep 21
1
Passing info from mail process to mail_filter plugin script?
Hi, all, The mail_filter plugin allows you to pass messages through an external script/command on the way into and out of the Maildir/mbox/etc mail store. With the recent/new version of the plugin, this seems to work correctly. However, my mail-filter script (for filtering messages on the way from the mail store through the IMAP process to a remote client) needs some extra info from the IMAP
2013 Feb 19
9
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add Intel TSX HLE Support
Hi All, I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. To support that, GCC chooses the approach by extending the memory order flag in __atomic_* builtins with target-specific memory model in high bits (bit 31-16 for
2012 Feb 28
3
[Patch] X86: expose HLE/RTM features to dom0
X86: expose HLE/RTM features to dom0 Intel recently release 2 new features, HLE and TRM. Refer to http://software.intel.com/file/41417. This patch expose them to dom0. Signed-off-by: Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> diff -r 92e03310878f xen/arch/x86/traps.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Wed Feb 08 21:05:52 2012 +0800 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Mon Feb 27 02:23:42 2012 +0800 @@ -857,9
2013 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add Intel TSX HLE Support
Hi All, I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. To support that, GCC chooses the approach by extending the memory order flag in __atomic_* builtins with target-specific memory model in high bits (bit 31-16 for
2018 Mar 02
2
Sieve filter doesn't respect mailbox separator
namespace separator is '.', this sieve script incorrectly tries to put the mail inside a mailbox rather that beside it, for example if the mailbox is named 'example', the mail will be put in the path 'example/.Spam' instead of 'example.Spam' require ["fileinto"]; if header :contains "X-Spam" "yes" { ? fileinto "Spam"; } #
2013 Feb 19
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add Intel TSX HLE Support
Here is the patch 0004-Enable-HLE-code-generation.patch Yours - Michael On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:07 -0800, Michael Liao wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. > HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to > specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. > To
2013 Feb 19
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add Intel TSX HLE Support
Here is the patch 0002-Add-HLE-target-feature.patch Yours - Michael On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:07 -0800, Michael Liao wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. > HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to > specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. > To support
2013 Feb 19
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add Intel TSX HLE Support
Hi Michael, Why do you want to add transactional memory support to LLVM ? Can't you implement transactional memory using a library call ? Judging by the number of patches it looks like a major change to LLVM, and I am not sure that I understand the motivation for including it in LLVM. Thanks, Nadav On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Michael Liao <michael.liao at intel.com> wrote:
2013 Feb 19
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add Intel TSX HLE Support
Here is the patch 0003-Add-XACQ-XREL-prefix-and-encoding-asm-printer-suppor.patch Yours - Michael On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:07 -0800, Michael Liao wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. > HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to > specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and
2013 Jun 13
3
Haswell 4770 misidentified as Sandy Bridge
Hi, I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error message from virt-manager is Error starting domain: unsupported configuration: guest and host CPU are not compatible: Host CPU does not provide required features: rtm,
2013 Jun 17
2
Re: Fwd: Haswell 4770 misidentified as Sandy Bridge
On 06/13/2013 10:11 PM, Michael Giardino wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu > from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The > guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error > message from virt-manager is > > Error starting domain: unsupported configuration:
2019 Sep 05
2
mail_filter and mail_filter_out broken somewhere between 2.2.27 and 2.3.4, problem still exists in git
Hi Dovecot folks, I recently reported this bug in Debian (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939442) after a stretch -> buster upgrade, however since I can reproduce it using the latest 2.4 from git I thought perhaps I ought to take it straight upstream. Here's the text I provided Debian about the issue, and below that I've included a syslog snip showing the same issue
2019 Apr 15
2
Fwd: SOLR/Index?
On 15/04/2019 12:59, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote: > forgot to reply all. > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: *Larry Rosenman* <larryrtx at gmail.com <mailto:larryrtx at gmail.com>> > Date: Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 5:58 AM > Subject: Re: SOLR/Index? > To: John Fawcett <john at voipsupport.it <mailto:john at voipsupport.it>> > > >