similar to: Mail User Agent?

Heya, we are seeing some strange issues with IMAP ID command using latest Roundcube builds on dovecot 2.2.10 responding "Input buffer full, aborting". Roundcube webmail connects to IMAP server and issues ID command first with some long arguments to ID command, however shorter than 1024 octets, which are specified in RFC2971 for ID IMAP extension. The situation is easily

Does dovecot store RFC2971 information supplied by client, anywhere?

Dear Friends, I have been using shorewall for some years. I want to set up "shorewall 2" router behind firewall, accordind to this picture: I have lost at setuping "zone"-s (wifi, lan1, net). Plese help me ! Thanks, psw net | | SHOREWALL 1 ------- lan 1 | | |wifi | | SHOREWALL 2 ------- lan 2 | ---------------- lan 3

> > You are running some kind of proxy in front of it. No proxy. Just sendmail with users using emacs/Rmail or Webmail/Squirrelmail. > If you want it to show real client IP, you need to enable forwarding of > said data. With dovecot it's done by setting > > login_trusted_networks = your-upstream-host-or-net > > in backend config file. > OK I changed it and

Hi, My questions concern the function 'mclustBIC' which compute BIC for a range of clusters of several models on the given data and the other function 'mclustModel' which choose the best model and the best number of cluster accordind to the results of the previous cited function. 1) When trying the following example (see ?mclustModel), I get negative BIC computed by

> > > On 12 April 2019 21:45 Robert Kudyba via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > You are running some kind of proxy in front of it. > > > > No proxy. Just sendmail with users using emacs/Rmail or > Webmail/Squirrelmail. > > > > > If you want it to show real client IP, you need to enable forwarding > of

SMTP lets you know the user agent, I thought that pop3 also. 2018-04-09 22:15 GMT+02:00 Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz at dovecot.fi>: > ID is an IMAP specific protocol command (RFC 2971). There is no POP or > SMTP equivalent. > > > On April 9, 2018 at 10:19 AM "j.emerlik" <j.emerlik at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > there in configuration is

I'm trying to setup IMAP, so that it works via secure connections. I have it working fine over SSL, now I wish to get TLS to work. I have set imap and imaps to both listen on *, and have disable_plaintext_auth = yes, which according to the docs, Disable LOGIN command and all other plaintext authentications unless SSL/TLS is used (LOGINDISABLED capability). So the problem is now, that TLS

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> >> >> On July 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> i'm trying to

> On July 11, 2017 at 11:50 AM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > > > Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > > > >>> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > >>> >

Hi, i'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian Wheezy) and output from LIST command looks strange: C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX INBOX.Karantena INBOX.Spam) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN)) S: * LIST () "." "INBOX" S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Karantena" S: * STATUS "INBOX.Karantena" (UNSEEN 0) S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Spam" S: * STATUS

Hello I am using dovecot 1.2.15 on ubuntu. Is it possible to somehow log the MUA information that is connecting to Dovecot? The reason I am wanting to do this is I would like to know if people are getting their email on personal devices instead of work secured / standardized phones.

Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > >> Cit?t Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>: >> >>> On 29 Nov 2018, at 15.46, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from >>>> repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded).

Op 28-1-2020 om 19:20 schreef azurit at pobox.sk: > Really no more info? You could do something with the sendmail_path or submission_host settings. Regards, Stephan. > > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > >> Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can be >> anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are

Cit?t Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>: > On 29 Nov 2018, at 15.46, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from >> repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded). >> >> >> >> Nov 29 14:25:11 server00 dovecot: lmtp(16854): Panic: file >> ostream-dot.c: line 208

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 11, 2017 at 7:51 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> is it possible to run a post-login script on proxy side? When a user >> is 'proxied' away, the standard post-login script seems to be skipped. >> I want to update last login datetime but only proxy has access to user

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> i'm trying to configure Dovecot proxy with user authentication on >> proxy side only, so backends will authenticate using master password >> (proxy is configured to send it). The problem is that Dovecot, on >>

Hello, I have dovecot q1.0-0_22.rc7 up and running on a server: I can read email from squirrelmail just fine. When I try to download email with fetchmail, however, I get the result below. Why is that happening? In dovecot.conf I have: protocols = imap imaps pop3, so why should pop3 or imap fail? Where should I look? (I'll fix the certificates problem after I've managed to get in

On 22.08.2017 03:56, Peter wrote: >>> Lest anyone think STARTTLS MITM doesn't happen, >>> >>> https://threatpost.com/eff-calls-out-isps-modifying-starttls-encryption-commands/109325/3/ > Right, the attack does happen, but it can be prevented by properly > configuring the server and client. Dovecot, by default, requires STARTTLS before accepting plaintext

Cit?t Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi>: >> On 12 Jul 2017, at 10.36, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> Backends don't have access to user database and i wanted to keep it >> like this :( > > Then probably your only possibility is to update last_login > information with the authentication > policy framework introduced in dovecot 2.2.25: >