similar to: Fw: new message

Hmm. if you put it *after* the ldap userdb, it should not have prevented users from logging in. What happens if you do userdb { ? driver = passwd-file ? args = .... ? skip = notfound ? result_failure = continue-ok } Aki On 07.08.2018 12:58, Simeon Ott wrote: > Now the attributes are correctly read for the user test at onnet.ch > <mailto:test at onnet.ch>, but other users are not

Ah. You probably need to change ldap userdb so that you add userdb { driver = ldap ? args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf result_success = continue-ok } so that the next one is processed. you can use 'doveadm user test at onnet.ch' to verify that the attributes are read for this user, and with another username that they are not. Aki On 07.08.2018 12:23, Simeon Ott wrote: > ?

Now the attributes are correctly read for the user test at onnet.ch <mailto:test at onnet.ch>, but other users are not able to authenticate anymore. root at buserver:/var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/Maildir/.super# doveadm user test at onnet.ch field value uid 5000 gid 5000 home /var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/ mail maildir:~/Maildir quota_rule *:bytes=1073741824 acl

? attached the dovecot -n, linked files, debug log lines during a standard client login root at buserver:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# doveconf -n # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.16.0-6-amd64 x86_64 Debian 8.11 auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login auth_verbose = yes auth_verbose_passwords = plain debug_log_path = syslog disable_plaintext_auth = no

http://repo.dovecot.org/ <http://repo.dovecot.org/> Sami > On 8 Aug 2018, at 10.27, Simeon Ott <simeon.ott at onnet.ch> wrote: > > Okay, this seems to be due to the fact that the option ?use_globals_only" is supported only in v2.2.31+ > We are on Debian jessie with dovecot v2.2.13 ? even an upgrade to current stable stretch won?t help (dovecot v2.2.27). So we will

Okay, this seems to be due to the fact that the option ?use_globals_only" is supported only in v2.2.31+ We are on Debian jessie with dovecot v2.2.13 ? even an upgrade to current stable stretch won?t help (dovecot v2.2.27). So we will wait until the packages find their way into the repository. thanks anyway > On 7 Aug 2018, at 13:00, Simeon Ott <simeon.ott at onnet.ch> wrote: >

still the same? root at buserver:/etc/dovecot# doveadm user test2 at onnet.ch field valueuserdb lookup: user test2 at onnet.ch doesn't exist relevant config output from doveconf -n userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf driver = ldap result_success = continue-ok } userdb { args = username_format=%Lu /etc/dovecot/share.passwd driver = passwd-file result_failure =

You could do userdb { ?? driver = username_format=%Lu passwd-file ?? args = /etc/dovecot/share.passwd } #? /etc/dovecot/share.passwd test at onnet.ch::::::: userdb_acl=vfile:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-acl userdb_acl_globals_only = yes should prevent the user from modifying any ACL files. Aki On 05.08.2018 17:04, Simeon Ott wrote: > Hello > > Is it possible to limit the ability of sharing

Hello Is it possible to limit the ability of sharing it?s own mailboxes to only a few users? We have a few sensitive mailboxes of users where the ability to share via IMAP SETACL should be prevented. I tried the following so far? doveadm acl remove -u test at onnet.ch <mailto:test at onnet.ch> INBOX user=test at onnet.ch <mailto:user=test at onnet.ch> admin but when doing this the

Thanks Sami, thanks Aki I just updated the packages on our testing server and now it works like expected. There are some LDAP tests to come. Are there many productive server out there using this repository? Simeon > On 8 Aug 2018, at 09:41, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > http://repo.dovecot.org/ <http://repo.dovecot.org/> > > Sami >

Hello Is it possible to limit the ability of sharing it?s own mailboxes to only a few users? We have a few sensitive mailboxes of users where the ability to share via IMAP SETACL should be prevented. I tried the following so far? doveadm acl remove -u test at onnet.ch INBOX user=test at onnet.ch admin but when doing this the admin rights are still there doveadm acl rights -u test at

Hello, I stumbled across a 5-year-old post on the dovecot list about changing the dovecot hierarchy separator to enable shared mailboxes (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-January/056201.html <http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-January/056201.html>). At the moment I?m stuck in a pretty similar situation. Migrated from courier to dovecot 2 years ago and preserved the

Hi All, Please find below an updated Vorbis-RTP Internet Draft document for review and discussion at the Xiph IRC meeting on Saturday. The changes in this version have been: Codebook caching mechanism Expanded SDP parameters Expanded MIME section Expanded introduction Packet loss section Minor tweaks and clarity changes to text There are probably some minor tweaks to the formatting needed

I'm running into a problem with Win95 clients and I hope someone has a fix for this. Our servers are Solaris boxes providing file services via both NFS and samba (1.9.16p11). The Win95 clients were recently upgraded to the latest version of FTP Software OnNet which makes the NFS stuff almost transparent to the users. I'm not sure how OnNet hooks in to Win95 but you could map a drive to

Hello! New message, please read <http://tecmawatco.com.vn/own.php?jr> Nouveau -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20151106/bdc7e7f9/attachment-0001.html>

Can someone tell me why the following from extensions.conf generates this error on asterisk load? Jan 13 09:27:24 WARNING[31701]: config.c:938 ast_config_internal_load: Maximum Include level (10) exceeded As far as I can tell I don't have a DEPTH of 10 includes. I certainly have more than 10 include statements, but I don't have them drilled down to a depth of 10. I'm thinking the

CC to R-help From: PIKAL Petr Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 2:20 PM To: 'li xiaomei' <lixiaomei0921 at gmail.com> Cc: r-help at r-project.org Subject: RE: [R] Fail to install package in R Hi You should keep conversation within the list, others could bring better answers. I still do not see any error message. I found this answer to seemingly same question.

Hi I am not sure if it is more readable > paste(paste(unlist(strsplit(x,"")),".", sep=""), collapse="") [1] "1.0.1.1.0.1.1.1." If you did not want last dot, it is a bit shorter. > paste(unlist(strsplit(x,"")),collapse=".") [1] "1.0.1.1.0.1.1.1" > Cheers Petr Tento e-mail a jak?koliv k n?mu p?ipojen?

Hi I do not know why does it happen but you can control the behaviour by setting scale to 0.5. Cheers Petr > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Leif Ruckman > Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 9:18 AM > To: r-help at r-project.org > Subject: [R] stem - strange leaves > > > x > [1] 8.0 7.9 7.5 7.0 8.0 7.3 8.0

Hi R is open source so you could dig into the code. However the actual stem function is probably written in C, so it is beyond my expertise. If you replied to the list there could be experts who are able to provide explanation. > stem function (x, scale = 1, width = 80, atom = 1e-08) { if (!is.numeric(x)) stop("'x' must be numeric") x <- x[is.finite(x)]