similar to: Maildir: ACLs/Unix perms and unable to see content of specific mailbox

Hi, I tried again with some other options. After finding http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-November/093793.html I deleted every ACL from the directory Maildir and I also assigned the group "mail" to it, recursively: OmniOS-Xeon:/tank/home/olaf/Maildir/.Generiche $ ls -lV total 903 drwxrwxrwx 2 olaf mail 2 Sep 27 23:47 cur

Hi, On 2015-09-19 16:17, Olaf Marzocchi wrote: > Dear Dovecot users, hello. > I will merge two issues I have into a single email because they may be > related. > > I used dovecot on a OmniOS server since 2014 (currently OmniOS > r151014) with the following configuration (it shows 2.2.18 because I > recently updated dovecot, skipping only the PostgreSQL plugin): > > #

On Mon, July 13, 2020 10:23, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2020-07-13 15:06, James B. Byrne wrote: > >>> Just out of curiosity, are you also using vfs_zfsacl? >> >> Yes. > > But only on DC1, AFAICT! > I see no mention of it on DC2's smb.conf. > That could be the reason why you have two different behaviour. > > bye > av. > That appears to

Hi. I'm using Samba on FreeBSD to host various file servers. Recently I've noticed one weird thing: samba needs w flag on file for being able to delete it, plus, when 'force user' is used, samba needs additional flags for group owning the file. Not sure if it was there all the time and it's just me, or may be this is an intended behaviour (I hope not), so, anyway I'll

Dear list, I have a freebsd 10 server with a ZFS pool, where data is shared with samba. ZFS ACLs are compliant with NFSv4 ACL. ZFS acl mode and inherit are set to passthrough (not sure it's really relevant here). The server is a domain member, and "standard" file service works well. I had the same setup with samba 3.5, where I was able to have a single share for all groups, so I

I am trying to replicate a samba-4.3 DC [192.168.8.65] to a newly joined samba-4.10 DC. I am using rsync as described in the samba wiki, excepting that I am using a remote shell (ssh) with the root user and password-less logins. When I run the command below from the 4.10 DC I get acl errors as shown below. rsync -XAavz --delete-after --rsh='ssh' [192.168.8.65]:/var/db/samba4/sysvol

Hi @all, with ZFS its recommended to create a new filesystem, for example for each user to give them a home directory. So far, so good. The homes should be under tank/export/home/staff and my intention is to restrict the ACL rights so only the user self can access his own home directory. I study the ZFS Admin Guide and found the aclmode and aclinherit options, IMHO for my intention the

Hello forum. I''m in the process of re-organizing my server and ACL-settings. I''ve seen so many different ways of doing ACL, which makes me wonder how I should do it myself. This is obviously the easiest way, only describing the positive permissions: /usr/bin/chmod -R A=\ group:sa:full_set:fd:allow,\ group:vk:read_set:fd:allow \ However, I''ve seen people split each

Greetings! I have a samba 3.6.18 acts as a domain member. I'm using a samba nss and creating local groups for a domain users. Here part of my nsswitch.conf: group: files winbind passwd: files winbind The problem is that the tdb unix GID mappings returns different ID from time to time for the same SIDs. Suppose we have a local group "samba_svn1", created with "NET SAM

On Tue, May 12, 2020 09:46, Rowland penny wrote: > One problem is that ZFS uses NFSv4ACLS and a Samba AD doesn't, it > expects POSIX ACLS, there also is a possibility that xattr may be > another problem. > > Try reading this: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12912 > I have worked with Timur on this very problem in the past. And he has produced in

Following the wiki replication guide precisely I got to this step. [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# rsync -XAavz --delete-after smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca:/var/db/samba4/sysvol/ /var/db/samba4/sysvol/ receiving file list ... done ./ brockley.harte-lyne.ca/ . . . brockley.harte-lyne.ca/scripts/ sent 142 bytes received 1,683 bytes 3,650.00 bytes/sec total size is 182 speedup is 0.10 [root at

On Sat, July 11, 2020 04:32, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2020-07-10 14:47, James B. Byrne wrote: >> FreeBSD-12.1p6 IOCage thick jails on ZFS, samba-4.10.15: > > Can you post the smb.conf of both DCs? > > Just out of curiosity, are you also using vfs_zfsacl? Yes. smb.confs DC1 and DC2: /zroot/iocage/jails/smb4-1a/root/usr/local/etc/smb4.conf [root at vhost04 ~ (master)]#

I am running a test system with Solaris 10u6 and I am somewhat confused as to how ACE inheritance works. I''ve read through http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/zfsadmin.pdf but it doesn''t seem to cover what I am experiencing. The ZFS file system that I am working on has both aclmode and aclinherit set to passthrough, which I thought would result in the ACEs being just

The Fedora Extras update of R found its way onto my systems today and I noted that fix() and edit() no longer work. There is a program crash that closes up R, but it does not leave a core file. I've tested by turning off SELinux, it had no effect. Do you see it too? What do you think? It happens on both systems I've tested. As far as I know, both of these systems are up-to-date. I

Dear all, I am new to R system. When I tried to edit data read from a csv file, R system crushed, I got an error message as follows: > edit(data) *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib/R/bin/exec/R terminated ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6(__chk_fail+0x41)[0x49d020b1] /lib/libc.so.6[0x49d034a2] /usr/lib/R/modules//R_X11.so[0x33ed7a] /usr/lib/R/modules//R_X11.so[0x34050d]

Dear all, I am new to R system. When I tried to edit data read from a csv file, R system crushed, I got an error message as follows: > edit(data) *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib/R/bin/exec/R terminated ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6(__chk_fail+0x41)[0x49d020b1] /lib/libc.so.6[0x49d034a2] /usr/lib/R/modules//R_X11.so[0x33ed7a] /usr/lib/R/modules//R_X11.so[0x34050d]

Hello Rowland, thanks, configuring the uidNumber and gidNumber on the AD fixed the issue, now getent passwd works. I just have one remaining issue, it seems the ACL doesn't work. As an example when I set ACL with full permission for user andrea: # /usr/bin/ls -ldV /cache/testsamba/ d---------+  3 root     root           5 Jun 19 19:40 /cache/testsamba/            

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8948 Summary: ZFS acls are not inherited. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ryan at mailinator.com

Hi all, I'd appreciate any pointers or advise regarding the following issue with files written by M$ Office on Samba 3.0.32 on snv_98 (OpenSolaris) on a ZFS filesystem: samba share: [sharename] read only = No browseable = yes writeable = yes directory mask = 0770 create mask = 0770 delete readonly = Yes acl check permissions =

Hi list, while preparing for the changed ACL/mode_t mapping semantics coming with onnv-147 [1], I discovered that in onnv-134 on my system ACLs are not inherited when aclmode is set to passthrough for the filesystem. This very much puzzles me. Example: $ uname -a SunOS os 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc $ pwd /Volumes/ACLs/dir1 $ zfs list | grep /Volumes rpool/Volumes 7,00G 39,7G 6,84G