similar to: Unsubscribe from shared mailbox

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 09:47:11 +0100 Miloslav Hůla via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dne 2019-01-15 v 13:22 Miloslav Hůla via samba napsal(a): > > When I mount CIFS share (mount -t cids) with vers=1.0 I can perform > > getcifsacl sucessfully. But when I mount with vers=2.0, or 2.1, or > > 3.0, ACL reading fails. > > > > getxattr error: 95 >

Hi, we are migrating from Cyrus to Dovecot and I would like to migrate seen flags for shared folder too. We have Dovecot 2.2.13 prepared as: location = maildir:/vmail/user/%%n/Maildir:INDEXPVT=/vmail/user/%n/Maildir/Shared/%%n Now I'm looking for 'dovecot.index.pvt.log' syntax to be able migrate Seen flags. All I know is, that index contains messages UID and Seen flag. May I ask

Dne 10.09.2020 v 17:40 John Stoffel napsal(a): >>> So why not run the backend storage on the Netapp, and just keep the >>> indexes and such local to the system? I've run Netapps for many years >>> and they work really well. And then you'd get automatic backups using >>> schedule snapshots. >>> >>> Keep the index files local on

Dne 09.09.2020 v 17:52 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> There is a one PCIe RAID controller in a chasis. AVAGO > Miloslav> MegaRAID SAS 9361-8i. And 16x SAS 15k drives conneced to > Miloslav> it. Because the controller does not support pass-through for > Miloslav> the drives, we use 16x RAID-0 on controller. So, we get > Miloslav> /dev/sda ... /dev/sdp (roughly) in

Hello, we are running Dovecot (2.2.13-12~deb8u1) on Debian stable. Configured with Mailbox++, IMAP, POP3, LMTPD, Managesieved, ACL. Mailboxes are on local 1.2TB RAID, it's about 5310 accounts. We are slowly getting out of space and we are considering to move Mailboxes onto Netapp disk array with two independent network connections. Are there some pitfalls? Not sure we should use NTP or

>>>>> "Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Me too... please look for further comments. Esp about 'fio' and Netapp useage. Miloslav> Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): Miloslav> Hello, Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs

Hi When I mount CIFS share (mount -t cids) with vers=1.0 I can perform getcifsacl sucessfully. But when I mount with vers=2.0, or 2.1, or 3.0, ACL reading fails. getxattr error: 95 REVISION:0x0 CONTROL:0x0 Why getcifsacl depends on SMB protocol version? Can I read ACL via newer SMB protocol? A asked on Serverfault but without reply:

Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> Hello, > Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: > Miloslav> "RAID-1 would be preferable" > Miloslav> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). >

Hi, is there any way, based on userdb/passwdb attribute, how to postpone an email delivery? The purpose is, I need to freeze an account (Maildir++) for a few minutes and new email must not be delivered. But emails must be delivered when account is unfrozen. I found few things about Postfix filters, but I'm not sure it's a good way. Thank you, Milo

Hi list, running Dovecot 2.2.27 on Ubuntu 14.04. A public mailbox "Public/Spam-Learning" in a public namespace with per-user "Seen" flags is configured like this: namespace pub { hidden = no inbox = no list = children location = maildir:/var/vmail/public:INDEXPVT=~/Maildir/public prefix = Public/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = public mailbox

One day, I'll use the LDAP. But infrastructure I got is quite neglected and some older admins is hard to convince to innovate. Just, aaaaah :) I read whole documentation related to userdb a and passdb. Easy to understand with relation to IMAP or POP3 access. But what I didn't understand is relation to LMTP. Which one is used and when for successful delivery. I'll try to move

Hi. If $otheruser shares a mailbox to $myuser, my private index is stored in *my* Maildir, according to this template (from the dovecot docs): mail_location = maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEXPVT=%h/Maildir/shared/%%u If $otheruser renames the shared mailbox, all my private mail flags (Seen) are lost because my mailclient couldn't find the private index anymore. Is there any way to store the

The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you have the latest firmware. On Wednesday, 09/09/2020 at 03:55 Miloslav H?la wrote: Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> Hello, > Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: > Miloslav> "RAID-1

Dne 07.09.2020 v 12:43 Sami Ketola napsal(a): >> On 7. Sep 2020, at 12.38, Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you

"Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Dne 09.09.2020 v 17:52 John Stoffel napsal(a): Miloslav> There is a one PCIe RAID controller in a chasis. AVAGO Miloslav> MegaRAID SAS 9361-8i. And 16x SAS 15k drives conneced to Miloslav> it. Because the controller does not support pass-through for

Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> > we have one user using the old Alpine client with IMAP. Time to time (3 > times per day or 3 times per week) he get error: "MAIL FOLDER INBOX > CLOSED DUE TO ACCESS ERROR" and he complains, that inbox stops to > refresh with new emails. Hmm, I see when using direct file access, but not when using IMAP, but I don't often

>>>>> "Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Dne 09.09.2020 v 17:52 John Stoffel napsal(a): Miloslav> There is a one PCIe RAID controller in a chasis. AVAGO Miloslav> MegaRAID SAS 9361-8i. And 16x SAS 15k drives conneced to Miloslav> it. Because the controller does not support pass-through for Miloslav> the drives,

Hi, we are migrating from Cyrus 2.3.7 to Dovecot 2.2.13. We have ~7000 maildirs with ~500GB. Our goal is to do the migration without users have notice and with the shortest service downtime. The users use IMAP (with shared folders and ACL), POP3 and sieve filters. As a first choice, we tried the Dovecot's dsync tool. First tests were great, but we are not able to change the Cyrus auth

>>>>> "Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Hello, Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: Miloslav> "RAID-1 would be preferable" Miloslav> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). Miloslav> May I ask you

I cannot verify it, but I think that even JBOD is propagated as a virtual device. If you create JBOD from 3 different disks, low level parameters may differ. And probably old firmware is the reason we used RAID-0 two or three years before. Thank you for the ideas. Kind regards Milo Dne 10.09.2020 v 16:15 Scott Q. napsal(a): > Actually there is, filesystems like ZFS/BTRFS prefer to see