similar to: Delivering email to Maildir PreINBOX

Hi all, I have a running dovecot with: $ dovecot -n # 2.2.18: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 4.1.0-x86_64-linode59 x86_64 Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) ext4 auth_debug = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login digest-md5 cram-md5 auth_verbose = yes auth_verbose_passwords = yes default_internal_user = root imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail tb-extra-mailbox-sep mail_debug = yes

On 19/08/15 22:11, Pascal Volk wrote: > On 08/19/2015 10:45 PM, Paulo Matos wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have a running dovecot with: >> $ dovecot -n >> # 2.2.18: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf >> [...] >> I started to filter my email with imapfilter running on the same host as >> dovecot. I would therefore like to deliver email to a folder

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:41 am, Steffen Kaiser < skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de [skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de] > wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Paulo Matos wrote: >> You can't change the name of the INBOX - the INBOX is always the INBOX. >> But you can choose the name of the target mailbox. > > How do I do that?

Hi, I have setup postfix master.cf to use dovecot-lda to deliver (using -m) all messages to PreInbox: dovecot unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f ${sender} -a ${recipient} -d ${user}@${nexthop} -m PreINBOX And enabled lda_mailbox_autocreate. The message I have now it: Aug 27 10:02:29 lda(): Info:

On 08/19/2015 10:45 PM, Paulo Matos wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a running dovecot with: > $ dovecot -n > # 2.2.18: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > [...] > I started to filter my email with imapfilter running on the same host as > dovecot. I would therefore like to deliver email to a folder called > PreINBOX so that imapfilter then sorts the email and ends up

On 29/08/15 11:31, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 27 Aug 2015, at 12:07, Paulo Matos <paulo at matos-sorge.com> wrote: >> >> Aug 27 10:02:29 lda(): Info: msgid=<dae42d0cf57bf4496a3dd53e162f8281 at localhost.localdomain>: save failed to open mailbox PreINBOX: Mailbox can't be created > > I have no idea how you could get that error message. Looking at the code I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Paulo Matos wrote: >> You can't change the name of the INBOX - the INBOX is always the INBOX. >> But you can choose the name of the target mailbox. > > How do I do that? Depends on your way to deliver messages. With Dovecot LDA you could use the -m option. > >> I don't know

Hi, I have setup message filtering and for example, I might move a message which a given sender to folder special/. This folder is created and shows up twice in INBOX/special/ and special/. They are however exactly the same folder. If I subscribe to one I am automatically subscribed to the other and viceversa. Not too happy with this configuration. I have a feeling this is related to

On 27/08/15 10:42, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses wrote: > Please check permissions as this sounds like a permissions issue m I am confused then. /home/vmail/Maildir is 700 for vmail:vmail. If dovecot-lda runs as vmail then there's no problem, if it runs as root it shouldn't face problems either. How can I determine which user dovecot-lda runs under? Thanks, -- Paulo Matos

Please check permissions as this sounds like a permissions issue m On 27/08/2015 12:08 PM, "Paulo Matos" <paulo at matos-sorge.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have setup postfix master.cf to use dovecot-lda to deliver (using -m) > all messages to PreInbox: > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail

Hi all, I am running an smbclient 3.4.7 on a ubuntu server 10.04. This is a local network whose hostnames in the network are setup manually through /etc/hosts. Zeus is a server which contains a music share which I am trying to access. I haven't created any users or passwords. The idea is that anyone within the local network should be able to access the share with read permissions, so I

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, 14:32 Paulo Matos <pmatos at linki.tools wrote: > > > On 12 February 2019 18:59:21 CET, Mikhail Ramalho < > mikhail.ramalho at gmail.com> wrote: > >I _think_ there is a problem with the license as well: Z3 is MIT, so > >clang > >would have to be released with Z3's license. > > I don't think that's a problem. You are not

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:09 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > I believe what you want is documented here: > > http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#datalayout > Just a note, since it might be a bug on the backend or documentation. It says on the documentation that size for f is either 32 or 64, however, sparc has 64 and 128. -- PMatos

Hi, I am starting to learn rails and I went through the guide and a couple of tutorials. Even though I understand controllers or at least I can use them I can''t see yet the whole picture. Why do you need several controllers for a single application? If a controller is just a class whose methods interface with models and views, why not have a single controller for the whole application?

Fixing llvm-dev at llvm.org to llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:27 AM Thomas Lively <tlively at google.com> wrote: > Thanks for your work on this, Paulo! > > Here's some more detail about how function pointers work today in the > WebAssembly backend and how they differ from the `funcref` Paulo is > working on. > > Today in the WebAssembly

Hello, I am trying to find out where the complete documentation for the TargetDescription string documentation is. I am reading the tutorial and looking at the sparc backend at the same time and there are some discrepancies. Therefore the documentation would be extremely valuable but I can't seem to find it. In the tutorial it shows the string "E-p:32:32-f128:128:128", but the real

Having said that, /home/vmail should be owned by vmail, however dovecot-lda should have write access so 700 is a bad idea. On 27/08/2015 3:00 PM, "Muzaffer Tolga Ozses" <tolga at ozses.net> wrote: > ps aux | grep lda > On 27/08/2015 2:58 PM, "Paulo Matos" <paulo at matos-sorge.com> wrote: > >> On 27/08/15 10:42, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses wrote: >>

I _think_ there is a problem with the license as well: Z3 is MIT, so clang would have to be released with Z3's license. On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, 09:24 Roman Lebedev via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:13 PM Paulo Matos via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to run scan-build

Hello, Is there any reason why the /docs (and its subdirectories) in the llvm webpage are dead? Thanks, -- PMatos

Hello, On a recent discussion on the cfe-dev mailing list[1] it was asked how easy it was to create a backend to an Harvard Arch chip: different data/function pointer sizes and 16 bit chars (main issues of the targeted arch). Ken Dyck has posted a patch (which solved at least the second problem of 16bit char) on which I have been working on and Douglas Gregor said that different pointer sizes are