similar to: need help debugging deleted mails

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60 matches similar to: "need help debugging deleted mails"

2015 Aug 11
0
[발송실패 안내] invain@naver.com 으로 메일이 전송되지 못했습니다.
NAVER - http://www.naver.com/ -------------------------------------------- invain at naver.com ?? ??? ?? <klibc Digest, Vol 143, Issue 25> ? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??????. -------------------------------------------- ?? ??? ???? ??? ?? ????. -------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2015 Aug 12
0
[발송실패 안내] invain@naver.com 으로 메일이 전송되지 못했습니다.
NAVER - http://www.naver.com/ -------------------------------------------- invain at naver.com ?? ??? ?? <klibc Digest, Vol 143, Issue 26> ? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??????. -------------------------------------------- ?? ??? ???? ??? ?? ????. -------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2004 Jul 07
2
wxGrid Event handling work around?
Hi wxRuby gurus, I remember a while back, Zach Dennis was working on a mini Spreadsheet app using wxGrid when the issue of lack of wxGrid event handling was discussed. I think Kevin (or Assaph?) had suggested some workarounds until the Swig based version is out. Could not figure out from the archives exactly what the final resolution was, but I am stuck at the same spot and am desperately in need
2018 Mar 05
0
[Bug 13317] rsync returns success when target filesystem is full
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317 --- Comment #6 from Rui DeSousa <rui.desousa at icloud.com> --- (In reply to Rui DeSousa from comment #5) It looks like no error is returned and result is a sparse file. I think a sync() would be required otherwise the file is truncated on close to meet the quota. [postgres at hades ~]$ df -h arch Filesystem Size Used
2024 Feb 06
0
BUG? rsync ends without message by delete files
here is another report of this behaviour. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/754923/rsync-just-stops nothing appropriate in bugzilla, besides https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317 do you use zfs or is there full-space/quota condition while running? if you can't resolve, please file a bugreport in bugzilla roland Am 06.02.24 um 22:18 schrieb Franke via rsync: > Hi
2015 Aug 14
0
occassional problem wtih upslog and apc ups units via snmp ... [NA] status
On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Bob Brown <bbrown at harpercollege.edu> wrote: > > Os is redhat enterprise, kernel 2.6.18-164.2.1.e15 > NUT is apparently 2.4.1 > It was installed by tar. > > Monitoring a lot of apc UPS units?mostly Smart-UPS of various flavors, also a Silcon DP380E. > > Normally works just fine? ?upslog? writes status log every 30 seconds with
2015 Aug 12
0
Внимание! Данное письмо дошло до Вас!
??????? ?? ??? ????! ???????????? email ????????: ???????????????? ????, ??????? ????????? ????????? ???? - ??????? ? ??????????? ???????? ??????????? ??????????.????? ???? ??????: ?????????? ?????????? mail ???????.??????? ????? ????? ??????: ?????? ??????? ???????! Email ???????? ??????????? ? ????? ????????? ???? ?????.?????????? ?????????? ????????????? ??????.?????????? ????? ???????
2015 Aug 12
0
CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 105, Issue 7
------------------ Original ------------------ From: "centos-docs-request"<centos-docs-request at centos.org>; Date: Wed, Aug 12, 2015 08:00 PM To: "centos-docs"<centos-docs at centos.org>; Subject: CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 105, Issue 7 Send CentOS-docs mailing list submissions to centos-docs at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
2015 Aug 12
0
Newbie
Hello everybody. My name is Arinov and I am CentOS 6 system administrator from ex-USSR. Can I join? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20150812/3865e980/attachment-0002.html>
2015 Aug 12
0
multiple messages per second to a single mailbox
On 08/12/2015 17:19, Chad M Stewart wrote: > What I'm seeing is very high load on the system (40) and queues building on the Postfix side. High load means, that there are a lot of processes waiting to run. The most likely cause for this is not CPU consumption, but I/O wait. Please run vmstat and iostat and post their output. Greetings Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A
2015 Aug 12
0
Error
Am 12.08.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 12/08/15 15:44, sandy.napoles at eccmg.cupet.cu wrote: >> OK, there could be several things going wrong here: >> Do you have /usr/local/samba/bin and /usr/local/samba/sbin at the >> start of your PATH ? >> -----> Yes I have both, in /usr/local/samba there's a folder bin and sbin > > Er, no, if you open a
2015 Aug 12
0
Error
Am 12.08.2015 um 17:07 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 12/08/15 15:54, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 12.08.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 12/08/15 15:44, sandy.napoles at eccmg.cupet.cu wrote: >>>> OK, there could be several things going wrong here: >>>> Do you have /usr/local/samba/bin and /usr/local/samba/sbin at the >>>>
2015 Aug 12
0
NHW Image codec
Hello, For those interested, I have improved the entropy coding scheme for wavelet coeffs compression.This scheme is now more complete, it is also faster, the compression gain is around 50-100octets, I would have expected more..., but it is getting harder to save bits for this part.Update at http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ . Now the discussions on video compression will be certainly focused on the
2015 Aug 12
2
Call Queues : linear strategy WITH priority
Hello I was wondering of it is possible to have Queue Agents with the same priority (penalty) but with a certain order ? So I have 20 Agents. Agent 1 till Agent 10 has penalty 1. Agent 11 till Agent 15 has penalty 2. (only contacted if 1 -> 10 are busy) Agent 16 till Agent 20 has penalty 3. (only contacted if 1 -> 10 and 11 -> 15 are busy) Within the range of Agent 1 till Agent
2015 Aug 12
2
Busy level in Asterisk 11
Hi I need to set the number of incoming calls to one, but the outgoing calls should be unlimited. I think the busylevel parameter is for it(incoming calls), but not works. My config is: cat sip.conf [general] [template](!) qualify=yes cc_agent_policy=generic cc_monitor_policy=generic call-limit=2 busylevel=1 callcounter=yes subscribecontext = hint allowsubscribe=yes [100](template)
2015 Aug 12
4
Test Email - Apologies for the noise
Apologies for the noise. I'm investigating a weird mail client issue that's been occurring for me since the mailing list switch and I've been unable to reproduce it outside of the list. When I click reply-all, Outlook removes all the LLVM mailing lists from the recipients list leaving just the individual recipients. Outlook Web Access is working perfectly fine. This thread is just to
2015 Aug 13
2
occassional problem wtih upslog and apc ups units via snmp ... [NA] status
Os is redhat enterprise, kernel 2.6.18-164.2.1.e15 NUT is apparently 2.4.1 It was installed by tar. Monitoring a lot of apc UPS units-mostly Smart-UPS of various flavors, also a Silcon DP380E. Normally works just fine... "upslog" writes status log every 30 seconds with various parameters.. Every so often, one of the UPS units has a log entry of:
2015 Aug 14
2
occassional problem wtih upslog and apc ups units via snmp ... [NA] status
I see this in syslog: Aug 12 03:57:22 orion upsd[18274]: Data for UPS [a102-apc-10] is stale - check driver (one for each UPS). Then I see a bunch of messages like this: Aug 12 03:58:02 orion upsd[18274]: write() failed for ::1: Broken pipe Aug 12 03:58:02 orion snmpd[2872]: Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:50940 And then it returns to normal like this: Aug 12 03:58:04 orion upsd[18274]: UPS
2015 Aug 12
2
[RFC] BasicAA considers address spaces?
I was lost from the thread at some point. Making the interface more general sounds good to me. This helps to solve Escha's concern that targets can know more about aliasing than just comparing address spaces. If there are no objections, I'll 1) add a new interface to TTI such as isTriviallyDisjoint. It returns false by default. 2) create a new AA that checks this interface, and add it to
2015 Aug 12
2
Proposal/patch: simple parallel LTO code generation
Hi all, The most time consuming part of LTO at opt level 1 is by far the backend code generator. (As a reminder, LTO opt level 1 runs a minimal set of passes; it is most useful where the motivation behind the use of LTO is to deploy a transformation that requires whole program visibility such as control flow integrity [1], rather than to optimise the program using whole program visibility). Code