Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "replication - remove/delete in storage"
2015 Jun 29
1
replication - remove/delete in storage
On 29/06/15 08:34, lejeczek wrote:
> nobody want to chip in, clarify this for me?
> If replication should replicate everything what I might
> have gotten wrong that remove/delete on messages does not
> replicate?
>
> On 26/06/15 15:20, lejeczek wrote:
>> hi,
>> novice question - is replication supposed to replicate
>> maildir in it's entirety?
>> I
2015 Jun 29
0
replication - remove/delete in storage
nobody want to chip in, clarify this for me?
If replication should replicate everything what I might have
gotten wrong that remove/delete on messages does not replicate?
On 26/06/15 15:20, lejeczek wrote:
> hi,
> novice question - is replication supposed to replicate
> maildir in it's entirety?
> I get new mails replicated but not operations of
> removal/deletion, is this
2017 Sep 13
3
one brick one volume process dies?
On 13/09/17 06:21, Gaurav Yadav wrote:
> Please provide the output of gluster volume info, gluster
> volume status and gluster peer status.
>
> Apart? from above info, please provide glusterd logs,
> cmd_history.log.
>
> Thanks
> Gaurav
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:22 PM, lejeczek
> <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:
2017 Sep 13
0
one brick one volume process dies?
Please send me the logs as well i.e glusterd.logs and cmd_history.log.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 13/09/17 06:21, Gaurav Yadav wrote:
>
>> Please provide the output of gluster volume info, gluster volume status
>> and gluster peer status.
>>
>> Apart from above info, please provide glusterd logs,
2017 Sep 04
2
heal info OK but statistics not working
1) one peer, out of four, got separated from the network,
from the rest of the cluster.
2) that unavailable(while it was unavailable) peer got
detached with "gluster peer detach" command which succeeded,
so now cluster comprise of three peers
3) Self-heal daemon (for some reason) does not start(with an
attempt to restart glusted) on the peer which probed that
fourth peer.
4) fourth
2012 Apr 25
1
dbench & similar - as a valid benchmark
hi everybody
would a tool such as dbench be a valid bechmark for gluster?
and, most importantly, is there any formula to estimate raw
fs to gluster performance ratio for different setups?
for instance:
having a replicated volume, two bricks, fuse mountpoint to
volume via non-congested 1Gbps
or even
a volume on single brick with fuse client mountpoing locally
what percentage/fraction of raw
2017 Sep 13
2
one brick one volume process dies?
Additionally the brick log file of the same brick would be required. Please
look for if brick process went down or crashed. Doing a volume start force
should resolve the issue.
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 at 16:28, Gaurav Yadav <gyadav at redhat.com> wrote:
> Please send me the logs as well i.e glusterd.logs and cmd_history.log.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, lejeczek
2011 Mar 07
9
Bejeweled 2 & Wine
I am trying to install Bejeweled 2 on Ubuntu 10.10 and im having problems. I am a novice Linux user with some experience, not so much with wine.
I have tried using v 1.2.2 and also 1.3.7. as there was a working test report in the database using the latter.
Here is the error I am getting in terminal after running the exe with wine 1.3.7
err:seh:setup_exception_record stack overflow 1336 bytes in
2018 May 02
1
unable to remove ACLs
On 01/05/18 23:59, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, lejeczek
> <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> hi guys
>
> I have a simple case of:
> $ setfacl -b
> not working!
> I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol,
> to a regular fs and removing acl works as
2016 Jun 08
1
keytabs basics linux <=> AD ?
hi users
a novice here hoping to grasp fundamentals soon
I have a samba+sssd as a client to an AD - I have all the
keytabs for a host(I think) but I noticed weird(to me at
least) smbclient behavior.
when I do:
$ smbclient -L swir -U me at AAA.PRIVATE.DOM -k
all works, clients sees local samba's shares, when I do:
$ smbclient -L swir.private.aaa.private.dom -U
pe243 at AAA.PRIVATE.DOM -k
2017 Sep 04
0
heal info OK but statistics not working
Ravi/Karthick,
If one of the self heal process is down, will the statstics heal-count
command work?
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 7:24 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 1) one peer, out of four, got separated from the network, from the rest of
> the cluster.
> 2) that unavailable(while it was unavailable) peer got detached with
> "gluster peer detach" command
2017 Sep 28
1
one brick one volume process dies?
On 13/09/17 20:47, Ben Werthmann wrote:
> These symptoms appear to be the same as I've recorded in
> this post:
>
> http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-September/032435.html
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Atin Mukherjee
> <atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com
> <mailto:atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Additionally the
2011 Feb 07
4
delete rows
Hello. I came across your response in an R forum and could use your help. I have a data set with 472 rows. I want to delete rows 416 through 472. The name of my data set is MERGE.
I am an extreme R novice. How do I write a script to accomplish this?
Thank you.
---
Christopher H. Porter, M.A., M.Ed.
Director, Undergraduate Recruitment
College of Engineering and Science
Clemson University
2018 May 01
2
unable to remove ACLs
hi guys
I have a simple case of:
$ setfacl -b
not working!
I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, to a
regular fs and removing acl works as expected.
Inside mounted gluster vol I seem to be able to
modify/remove ACLs for users, groups and masks but that one
simple, important thing does not work.
It is also not the case of default ACLs being enforced from
the parent, for I
2017 Sep 12
2
one brick one volume process dies?
hi everyone
I have 3-peer cluster with all vols in replica mode, 9 vols.
What I see, unfortunately, is one brick fails in one vol,
when it happens it's always the same vol on the same brick.
Command: gluster vol status $vol - would show brick not online.
Restarting glusterd with systemclt does not help, only
system reboot seem to help, until it happens, next time.
How to troubleshoot this
2017 Sep 01
2
peer rejected but connected
Logs from newly added node helped me in RCA of the issue.
Info file on node 10.5.6.17 consist of an additional property
"tier-enabled" which is not present in info file from other 3 nodes, hence
when gluster peer probe call is made, in order to maintain consistency
across the cluster cksum is compared. In this
case as both files are different leading to different cksum, causing state
in
2017 Sep 13
0
one brick one volume process dies?
These symptoms appear to be the same as I've recorded in this post:
http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-September/032435.html
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Additionally the brick log file of the same brick would be required.
> Please look for if brick process went down or crashed. Doing a volume start
2017 Sep 04
2
heal info OK but statistics not working
hi all
this:
$ vol heal $_vol info
outputs ok and exit code is 0
But if I want to see statistics:
$ gluster vol heal $_vol statistics
Gathering crawl statistics on volume GROUP-WORK has been
unsuccessful on bricks that are down. Please check if all
brick processes are running.
I suspect - gluster inability to cope with a situation where
one peer(which is not even a brick for a single vol on
2023 Apr 19
2
bash test ?
On 19/04/2023 08:04, wwp wrote:
> Hello lejeczek,
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:50:29 +0200 lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys.
>>
>> I cannot wrap my hear around this:
>>
>> -> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $?
>> 0
>> -> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $?
>> 0
>> -> $
2015 Jun 17
4
dsync selectively
On 16/06/15 14:27, lejeczek wrote:
> On 16/06/15 14:16, lejeczek wrote:
>> On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote:
>>> P,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder..
>>>> would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only
>>>> specific