similar to: Virtual Mailboxes

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Virtual Mailboxes"

2015 Jun 20
0
Virtual Mailboxes
The first bonehead maneuver seems to be: location = virtual:/var/mail/%%d/%%n/mdbox/virtual I'm thinking it should be: location = virtual:/var/mail/%%d/%%n/mdbox/mailboxes/virtual But...it didn't seem to make a difference. And if I have the "virtual" folder tree under a location other than "/var/mail/domain/user/mdbox/mailboxes" no names appear - so I think I
2015 Jun 22
0
Virtual Mailboxes
Any ideas on what I need to check or should post to help find the problem? -- Daniel On 2015-06-20 14:50, dmiller at amfes.com wrote: > The first bonehead maneuver seems to be: > location = virtual:/var/mail/%%d/%%n/mdbox/virtual > I'm thinking it should be: > location = virtual:/var/mail/%%d/%%n/mdbox/mailboxes/virtual > > But...it didn't seem to make a
2015 Jun 25
0
Virtual Mailboxes
My next bonehead maneuver - was more of the first! location = virtual:/var/mail/%%d/%%n/mdbox/mailboxes/virtual was adapted from my definition for my shared namespace. Which was intended to share OTHER users - which is why the '%%' prefixes are used. Changing to: location = virtual:/var/mail/%d/%n/mdbox/mailboxes/virtual Now I can actually view something! But I still have a
2020 Feb 13
0
Shared Mailboxes with Multiple Domains
Trying to track down a problem I've been dealing with for a while. Everything else works fine - the problem is with shared mailboxes. My present, and desired, prefix for the shared namespace is: prefix = INBOX/shared/%%d/%%n/ Some mail clients, particularly Thunderbird and Android's AquaMail, have no problem with this. But other (presumably broken) clients don't show the shared
2020 Feb 17
1
Shared Mailboxes with Multiple Domains
Any thoughts on this? --- Daniel ------ Original Message ------ From: "Daniel Miller" <dmiller at amfes.com> To: "Dovecot Mailing List" <dovecot at dovecot.org> Sent: 2/12/2020 6:16:05 PM Subject: Shared Mailboxes with Multiple Domains >Trying to track down a problem I've been dealing with for a while. Everything else works fine - the problem is with
2018 Dec 26
0
Segfault report
> On 26 December 2018 at 11:26 Daniel Miller via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > Ubuntu 18.04, AMD Opteron, Dovecot Version 2.3.3, local file storage.? I > believe it's one of my users checking mail remotely via mobile - don't > remember if it's an iPhone or Android. > > gdb backtrace: > Reading symbols from
2018 Feb 28
0
BUG: Error: dovecot.index.pvt reset, view is now inconsistent when shared folder is new and empty
Hi, I'm using Dovecot 2.2.33.2 on a RHEL 7, new installation. My log is full of : Error: INDEX_FOLDER/dovecot.index.pvt reset, view is now inconsistent or Error: INDEX_FOLDER/dovecot.index.pvt view is inconsistent when shared folder is never touched and empty. UserA share XXXXX folder with UserB, if XXXXX folder is new (never touched) and empty every time UserB looks in that folder, an
2018 Aug 14
2
sdbox filesystem backup potential excludes
On 8/14/2018 12:55 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 13.08.2018 19:51, Daniel Miller wrote: >> When doing a filesystem backup of an moderate sdbox mailstore (300GB) >> - are there any files that can be safely excluded from the backup? >> Like *.log or *.backup?? Or are they all "vital" for recovery? >> >> I'm already excluding the sdbox/virtual folders
2018 Dec 26
2
Segfault report
Ubuntu 18.04, AMD Opteron, Dovecot Version 2.3.3, local file storage.? I believe it's one of my users checking mail remotely via mobile - don't remember if it's an iPhone or Android. gdb backtrace: Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap...done. [New LWP 13852] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library
2015 Oct 13
0
fts solr ignores new mailboxes until fts rescan
Hi, On 2015-10-12 18:39, Giorgio Paolucci wrote: > Hello, > on my debian wheezy installation, I implemented fts plugin with solr as > indexing system. > I noticed that if a user creates a new folder, that folder it is > ignored by > dovecot indexing until a doveadm fts rescan is performed for that user. > From that time on everything works ok on that folder. > > As a
2015 Jul 28
2
bug in acl_defaults_from_inbox option
Hi at all, there is a bug in in acl_defaults_from_inbox option: if you define it with ANY value ('yes', 'no', 'whatyouwant', 'xxx') it acts like the value is ALWAYS 'yes', and Dovecot enable it; the only way to disable it, is comment it or delete from configuration file. With 'acl_defaults_from_inbox = no', or 'acl_defaults_from_inbox =
2015 Oct 13
1
fts solr ignores new mailboxes until fts rescan
Hi Christian, may be the issue is related to this other post: http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-September/102094.html Anyway, what I can tell you is that for every? user account,? for every folders created after the last doveadm fts rescan for that user, dovecot does not invoke indexer. A new rescan fix the problem for all the folders created up to that moment. I was wondering if I was
2017 Feb 10
0
dovecot Digest, Vol 166, Issue 22
I have not tried it at all. Was just an suggestion. You can try something like protocol lda { namespace archive { ... } } On 10.02.2017 14:12, Nick Lekkas wrote: > > Hi Aki > > > > Thanks for your answer .... > > What version of dovecot have you tried it ? Mine is 2.2.10 > > > > > > > > > > *From:*Aki Tuomi
2015 Oct 12
2
fts solr ignores new mailboxes until fts rescan
Hello, on my debian wheezy installation, I implemented fts plugin with solr as indexing system. I noticed that if a user creates a new folder, that folder it is ignored by dovecot indexing until a doveadm fts rescan is performed for that user. From that time on everything works ok on that folder. As a test I set fts_autoindex=yes and put in that folder a brand new mail never indexed before. in
2017 Feb 09
0
dovecot Digest, Vol 166, Issue 22
Hello to all After a lot of tries using dovecot 2.2.10 on centos 7 latest ...i could not manage make dovecot dsync work ... i have tried a lot of scenarios using mysql as backend , custom user file. Using by command line the dsync it works fine Has anyone managed to use 2.2.10 ..? -----Original Message----- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of dovecot-request at
2013 Apr 18
1
Multiple Logins on same accounts from different stations
Hi, all I've recently upgraded to 2.1.16 and found my self in deep .... There are 4 accounts in my setup that need to be accessed simultaneously by 5-6 PCs on a local lan. The thing is if a user A updates, deletes, flags mail messages in the imap folders the changes don't get propagated to the other mail clients. To state this clearly, PC (A) thunderbird has an account SALES, Maildir
2012 Jan 30
0
A namespace error on 2.1rc5
Hello all, I'm not sure if this is a bug. It's probably just an upgrade note. In summary I had no namespace section in my 2.0.17 config. When trying out 2.1rc5 no user could login because of a namespace error. 2.1rc5 adds a default namespace clause which broke my logins (It was noted in the changelog) I seemed to fix it by just putting this in the config file: namespace inbox {
2018 Feb 02
1
Dovecot 2.3.0, Panic: file mailbox-attribute.c: line 362 (mailbox_attribute_get_stream): assertion failed: (value_r->value != NULL || value_r->value_stream != NULL)
Hi at all, I have a RHEL7 server with Dovecot 2.3.0 (new installation). I've a problem when trying to dsync from a Dovecot 2.2.24 server. If I try to sync any user with a folder with ACL, dsycn crash with panic: Source server: dsync-local(USERNAME): Debug: sieve: file storage: sync: Synchronization active dovecot: dsync-local(USERNAME): Debug: acl vfile: reading file
2015 Jul 28
3
sharing INBOX with ACL -> share all folders
Hi at all, I have a problem with ACL; I want to share INBOX and Sent folder to an other user, but when I configure ACL on INBOX, all folders are shared (Sent, Junk, Draft, Trash, etc) # doveadm acl get -u janedoe INBOX ID Global Rights user=johndoe expunge insert lookup post read write write-deleted write-seen # doveadm acl get -u janedoe Sent ID Global Rights
2017 Jun 05
0
fts_solr: uid0?
I'm seeing the following: Jun 5 11:10:52 thebighonker dovecot: imap(ler): Error: fts_solr: received invalid uid '0' Is there something I can get for you to debug? doveconf -n: # 2.2.30.1 (eebd877): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.18 (29cc74d) # OS: FreeBSD 11.1-PRERELEASE amd64 auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_default_realm = lerctr.org auth_mechanisms