similar to: dsync selectively

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "dsync selectively"

2015 Jun 16
2
dsync selectively
On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote: > P, > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote: > >> I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder.. >> would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only specific >> domain(users)? or it's always the whole lot? > See > http://blog.dovecot.org/2012/02/dovecot-clustering-with-dsync-based.html >
2015 Jun 17
4
dsync selectively
On 16/06/15 14:27, lejeczek wrote: > On 16/06/15 14:16, lejeczek wrote: >> On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote: >>> P, >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote: >>> >>>> I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder.. >>>> would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only >>>> specific
2015 Jun 18
0
dsync selectively
On 06/17/2015 06:07 PM, lejeczek wrote: > On 16/06/15 14:27, lejeczek wrote: >> On 16/06/15 14:16, lejeczek wrote: >>> On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote: >>>> P, >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder.. >>>>> would
2015 Jun 16
0
dsync selectively
On 16/06/15 14:16, lejeczek wrote: > On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote: >> P, >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote: >> >>> I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder.. >>> would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only >>> specific >>> domain(users)? or it's always the whole lot? >> See
2015 Jun 16
0
dsync selectively
P, On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote: > I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder.. > would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only specific > domain(users)? or it's always the whole lot? See http://blog.dovecot.org/2012/02/dovecot-clustering-with-dsync-based.html basically set 'mail_replica' to 'remote:server3' in your
2017 Jan 23
2
dsync dovecot / Failed connection refused
Dear all, I am using VMWare and I have cloned my emails server. Now I do have two identicals servers, both running the same version of dovecot (2.2.13) and imap. Let's call them: server1.domain.ltd and server2.domain.ltd. I would like to sync both server using dsync. Dovecot is working well except concerning the sync. dsync config server1.domain.ltd # Enable the replication plugin
2017 Jan 24
3
dsync dovecot / Failed connection refused
Hi Mike, Is the value of the 'doveadm_port' if I am choosing: mail_replica = tcp:server1.domain.ltd no ? I might be wrong too ;) Thx Le mardi 24 janvier 2017 ? 11:41:28, vous ?criviez : > Hello, > I might be wrong, but the port which will be used for the replicator > port is the value of 'doveadm_port' which in your case is 4711. > Mike; > On 01/23/2017
2017 Feb 03
3
Dovecot dsync 'ssl_client_ca'
Hello, Still working with my dsync pb. I have done a clone (vmware) of my email server. Today I have two strictly identical emails servers (server1 (main) and server2 (bck) (except IP, hostname and mail_replica). The ssl config on my both server: ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 ssl = required verbose_ssl = no ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/private.key ssl_cert =
2012 Mar 04
4
dsync replication available for testing
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything isn't finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my @dovecot.fi mails. Some issues: - public namespace isn't replicated at all - shared namespace is replicated, but not private mail flags - I've only tested SSH replication setup now, not director replication setup (and director setup
2016 Aug 28
2
Dsync config help
Hi, I?m having a hard time with the?http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication ?page. - for a master-master setup, does the configuration need to be mirrored on both masters? - after aggregating unrelated sections of the wiki page, there seems to be 3 different values for ?mail_replica": - "remote?: for SSH - ?remoteprefix": for SSH wrapper - ?tcp?: for?TCP connection using
2014 Mar 28
2
dsync replication questions
I am running two servers with Dovecot v2.2.12 on CentOS x86_64 (5.10 and 6.5 respectively) and users are virtual over ldap. I have setup our main internal server (vmail.example.com) with dsync replication according to the first part of http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication. The second one (vmail1.example.com) will be the failover server which we want to be a real-time mirror (but can be
2016 Sep 01
2
Dsync config help
I was able to workaround the ?Error: sync: /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb: Configured passdbs don?t support credentials lookups (to see if user is proxied, because doveadm_port is set)? problem:? => I simply disabled ?doveadm_port? and added the port number at the end of the remote URL in ?mail_replica? Replication seems to work although I have regular errors (idk if they are related to each
2017 Feb 03
4
Dovecot dsync 'ssl_client_ca'
Hi, I have made change: ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 ssl = required verbose_ssl = no ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/private.key ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/key.crt ssl_client_ca_file = </etc/ssl/certs/GandiCA2.pem # Create a listener for doveadm-server service doveadm { user = vmail inet_listener { port = 12345 ssl= yes } } and doveadm_port = 12345 // mail_replica =
2017 Sep 16
2
dsync panic in mbox_lock
Hello I am trying to setup replication with dovecot-2.2.29.1, and for some users, I get a reproductible panic: # doveadm -v -o plugin/mail_replica=remoteprefix:root at mail2.example.net sync -d -u jdoe dsync-local(jdoe): Panic: file mbox-lock.c: line 799 (mbox_lock): assertion failed: (lock_type == F_RDLCK || mbox->mbox_lock_type != F_RDLCK) Abort User is not overquota, and filesystem
2013 Apr 25
1
Replication fails with "Remote dsync doesn't use compatible protocol"
I can't get replication to work in Dovecot 2.2.1. I'm getting the following error on the machine where I'm initiating the replication: richatwork dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(richatwork): Error: dsync(local): Remote dsync doesn't use compatible protocol Both the local and remote servers are running identical versions of Dovecot (2.2.1), so I don't understand why I
2013 Apr 22
1
Replication -- multiple users, three or more servers?
I'm running Dovecot 2.2.1 on an Ubuntu 12.04.2 server, with half a dozen accounts for various family members. I want to set up replication involving at least three Ubuntu servers, with different users replicated on different sets of servers. For example, I might have mail for "user1" replicated on "server1", "server2", and "server3"... while mail for
2017 Feb 06
2
Dovecot dsync 'ssl_client_ca'
Hi Aki, I do not have any error message but (on both server): doveadm replicator status '*' doveadm(root): Fatal: net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/replicator-doveadm) failed: Connection refused Thx Le vendredi 3 f?vrier 2017 ? 17:09:52, vous ?criviez : > Please keep responses in list. rm -f > /var/lib/dovecot/ssl-parameters.dat, i think it was in that dir. > On
2015 May 29
2
multi sync (>2 servers) + selective sync + trigger
Hi all, I've been researching ways to replicate mail across multiple mailstores and have a few questions. Synching 2 mailstores (M1 & M2) via dsync works fine. I want to add a 3rd and 4th (M3 & M4) server to also be synced. Multi-sync (>2 servers): 1) How do I tell M1 and/or M2 to also sync to M3 and/or M4? Selective sync: 2) How do I sync specific domains to specific
2018 Mar 30
1
Replication fails with dsync-server(admin@asergis.com): Error: Couldn't create lock /home/admin/.dovecot-sync.lock: No such file or directory
Hello I have configured replication using dsync. It fails with a message Error: Couldn't create lock /home/admin/.dovecot-sync.lock: No such file or directory This directory predictably does not exist - all my users are supposed to be virtual.? I can not find an option to switch this off. At the same time if I try manual replication I get segfault error Mar 30 17:17:24
2014 Sep 09
1
My Dsync isn't replicating 'EXPUNGE' IMAP command
Hi! I have two Dovecot-2.2.13 servers with Dsync Replication: server1 and server2. When I execute 'EXPUNGE' on server1 side, the messages with FLAG \Deleted are expunged only on server1. The message is still present in Server2. Could someone give me a hint reason for this ? Thanks in advance! -- Thiago Henrique ======================================================================