similar to: What became of dovecot.passwd?

On Thu, 21 May 2015 19:21:41 -0500, you wrote: > >On May 21, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Steve Matzura wrote: > >> I needed to receive a message to admin at mydomain.com. I waited and >> waited for it, but it never showed up in the admin mailbox on the >> mydomain.com machine. So I looked for the admin account in >> /etc/dovecot.passwd, and there it was, plain-text password

My system has a great big four users. The Dovecot wiki says LMTP is more efficient, and someone on IRC told me I'd need it if I were ever to use sieve, which at this time I have no intention of doing. Should I stick with LDA, or just implement LMTP so I'm ready if ever I need it in the future? The bottom line is, it's unclear from the wiki how to explicitly specify use of one or the

Im assuming you found "doveadm" ? On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > passwd solved. > -- Aj. Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/ajaikhattri> Enoland <https://flipboard.com/@eno/enoland-be2ss0apy>

Im using Dovecot for LMTP for all my mail users, since this way they are completely virtual (i.e. dont need to have a local account at all), all mail gets delivered to Maildirs owned by dovecot. Also LMTP makes it easier to insert scripts and do any custom processing which presumably is where Sieve comes in. Its also pretty easy to setup. On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Steve Matzura

On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version 1.0.15 with: rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and ready to start testing with Postfix, it appears the old version is still in /usr/local/sbin, /usr/local/include, /usr/local/libexec, /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/shared/doc. Thinking that anything in /usr/local is

My /var/log/maillog was getting pretty big because of lots of testing and re-configuring I've been doing lately with both Dovecot and Postfix. I figured just remove /var/log/maillog and it would be re-created. It wasn't--not by Dovecot, not by Postfix. I had to manually create a new one, put one character in it, save it, properly secure it with chmod, and then Dovecot (and postfix)

After applying some changes to 10-master.conf as detailed at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP I receive the following when trying to start: doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf line 49: Expecting '{' I'm trying to enable LMTP. The instructions say: Socket configuration The actual socket is configured in

I mean, in the source directory. On 12 June 2015 at 15:13, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses <tolga at ozses.net> wrote: > Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things > dovecot. > > On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > >> On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version >> 1.0.15 with:

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:02:29 +0200, you wrote: >Am Dienstag, den 16.06.2015, 11:44 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura: >> The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of >> delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a >> valid or relayed user at my remote machine's address, it never gets >> there. I know this virtually for sure

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:27:58 -0500, you wrote: >No attempt to deliver almost always means either: >- a DNS problem; the sender can't find the destination, or finds the >"wrong" destination. That would be interesting, since I tried both the actual IP address and the DNS name for the test node. Neither message got through. >- a connectivity problem; the sender can't

Looks like a lot of tedium. I'll give it a go on Red Hat, but not before a full backup first. On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:26:13 -0800, you wrote: >Hello, > >Fedora and CentOS don't have any prebuilt packages in the standard repos. > >Here are a few guides from the Liquidsoap community, specific to CentOS. >http://puck.in/2013/12/install-liquidsoap-1-1-on-centos-6-4/

Looks like it's what I need. Do you know, is there a distro or repo for Fedora? Or should I build it from source? On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 07:56:39 -0800, you wrote: >Hi Steve. > >Liquidsoap supports CUE sheets as an input. > >http://savonet.sourceforge.net/doc-svn/playlist_parsers.html >On Jan 7, 2015 5:04 AM, "Steve Matzura" <sm at noisynotes.com> wrote: >

I could, but I have this big old Fedora system just waiting for me to get LS working on it, so I think I need to concentrate on making that happen. If it's hard, difficult, tedious, inconvenient, then that's what it is. I want the cue sheet capability some way somehow, so I'm just going to have to knuckle down and buckle down and do it. Right? On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:21:27 -0800, you

Can anyone recommend any program newer than the last release of Liquidsoap, which, unless I misread the page, was in 2007?

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 17:47:38 +0200, you wrote: >Hello Steve! > >2015-04-02 17:32 GMT+02:00 Steve Matzura <sm at noisynotes.com>: >> Ya know, there are none so blind ... IT'S BEEN COMMENTED OUT! >> >> <security> >> <chroot>0</chroot> >> <!-- >> <changeowner> >>

I can't say whether this is either an Ices or a CentovaCast issue, but there are certain programs that play perfectly normally but generate just piles of email about invalid sample rates or frames containing metadata that's not supported. Is there a way to turn these emails off? One of them recently was over four thousand lines long, which really shocked me, and it takes a lot to shock me.

According to https://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.1/config-file.html: ssl If et to 1 will enable HTTPS on this listen-socket. Icecast must have been compiled against openSSL to be able to do so. Does the standard Icecast ditribution include SSL support, or must it be built manually to include this? I've read articles saying both are true. Which is correct?

OK, took a crash course in systemctl. Got the service properly enabled. However, got one odd error when I started it. Mar 26 18:06:10 {my-FQDN} icecast[839]: ERROR: You should not run icecast2 as root Mar 26 18:06:10 {my-FQDN} icecast[839]: Use the changeowner directive in the config file The XML shows: <changeowner> <user>nobody</user> <group>nogroup</group>

On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 05:22:14 +0000, you wrote: >On 03/26/2015 09:02 PM, Steve Matzura wrote: >> Well, here's the whole output from systemctl. >> >> # systemctl status icecast -l >> icecast.service - Icecast Network Audio Streaming Server >> Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/icecast.service; enabled) >> Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since

I may have asked this before, but either I didn't, or I've inadvertently discarded the message containing the answer, so pardon please if this is a repeat. Wil EZStream ever support cue sheets--a companion file containing metadata information normally inserted into the stream from that contained in the multimedia file itself? More play-out software is including the ability to produce