Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "v2.2.17 release candidate 2 released"
2015 May 13
1
v2.2.17 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.17.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.17.tar.gz.sig
A few director improvements since RC2, some fixes and a new plugin: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/QuotaClone
* Dovecot no longer checks or warns if a mountpoint is removed. This
was causing more trouble than it was worth. Make sure that all the
mountpoints that Dovecot
2015 May 13
1
v2.2.17 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.17.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.17.tar.gz.sig
A few director improvements since RC2, some fixes and a new plugin: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/QuotaClone
* Dovecot no longer checks or warns if a mountpoint is removed. This
was causing more trouble than it was worth. Make sure that all the
mountpoints that Dovecot
2015 May 13
1
v2.2.17 release candidate 2 released
On 13 May 2015, at 01:15, Santiago Vila <sanvila at unex.es> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:25:44AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> - mbox: Fixed crash/corruption in some situations when the first mail
>> was expunged.
>
> Once again: This is *not* fixed!
One bug was fixed, but looks like there was another one. I tried after the fix that your test case
2015 May 09
10
v2.2.17 release candidate released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz.sig
Quite a lot of changes, so here's a release candidate first. If no problems are reported I'll make v2.2.17 release early next week. Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16.
* Dovecot no
2015 May 09
10
v2.2.17 release candidate released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz.sig
Quite a lot of changes, so here's a release candidate first. If no problems are reported I'll make v2.2.17 release early next week. Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16.
* Dovecot no
2015 May 12
0
v2.2.17 release candidate 2 released
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:25:44AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> - mbox: Fixed crash/corruption in some situations when the first mail
> was expunged.
Once again: This is *not* fixed!
I've just tested it on 2:2.2.17~rc1-1~auto+17 by Stephan Bosch, which
is based on revision 18656:6f167f2e550d, and none of the changesets
between 18656 and 18660 are related to this.
Please try a
2015 May 10
0
v2.2.17 release candidate released
I'm now seeing these crashes in the indexing code:
May 10 12:22:32 tornado.reub.net dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.2.17.rc1
(3903badc4ee0+) starting up for imap, lmtp, sieve
...
May 10 13:07:50 tornado.reub.net dovecot: indexer: Error: Indexer worker
disconnected, discarding 1 requests for reuben
May 10 13:07:50 tornado.reub.net dovecot: indexer-worker(reuben): Fatal:
master:
2015 May 10
2
v2.2.17 release candidate released
> Michael Grimm <trashcan at odo.in-berlin.de> kirjoitti 9.5.2015 kello 23.17:
>
> Hi ?
>
> Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16.
>
> 2.2.17.rc1 will compile on FBSD 10.1 only, if bash has been installed
Dovecot hg requires bash
2015 May 10
0
v2.2.17 release candidate released
On May 9, 2015, at 19:13 , Jerry <jerry at seibercom.net> wrote:
>> 2.2.17.rc1 will compile on FBSD 10.1 only, if bash has been installed (see
>> <554773D2.9060609 at dovecot.fi> from Teemu Huovila).[...]. But, maybe it's worth
>> solving this issue for those non-linux systems without bash installed per
>> default before releasing dovecot v2.2.17, finally.
2015 May 09
2
v2.2.17 release candidate released
On Sat, 9 May 2015 22:17:27 +0200, Michael Grimm stated:
>Hi ?
>
>Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger
>> configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16.
>
>2.2.17.rc1 will compile on FBSD 10.1 only, if bash has been installed (see
><554773D2.9060609 at dovecot.fi> from Teemu
2015 May 09
0
v2.2.17 release candidate released
Hi ?
Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
> Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16.
2.2.17.rc1 will compile on FBSD 10.1 only, if bash has been installed (see <554773D2.9060609 at dovecot.fi> from Teemu Huovila). This is from my point of view regarding portability issues "suboptimal". Both,
2015 Mar 05
0
SELinux kills Cassandra based website
An easy way to start troubleshooting these is to look at the audit logs and
see what SELInux is blocking. You have /McFrazier in the email.. if that's
off the root tree than unless you've set permissions to allow httpd to look
at tat folder, I bet that's one problem.
if you run ls -Z you can see the labels that are present on those folders,
that might be helpful too.
On Wed, Mar 4,
2015 Mar 05
2
SELinux kills Cassandra based website
Hey all,
There's a website I help run that uses the Cassandra DB as its database. I
notice that if I run the web server in SELinux permissive mode, the site
works fine. But if I put it into enforcing mode, the site goes down with
this error:
Warning: require_once(/McFrazier/PhpBinaryCql/CqlClient.php): failed to
open stream: Permission denied in
2015 Mar 05
1
SELinux kills Cassandra based website
Hi Jeremy,
An easy way to start troubleshooting these is to look at the audit logs and
> see what SELInux is blocking. You have /McFrazier in the email.. if that's
> off the root tree than unless you've set permissions to allow httpd to look
> at tat folder, I bet that's one problem.
> if you run ls -Z you can see the labels that are present on those folders,
> that
2014 Jun 04
1
NoSQL support
Is there any support for NoSQL databases such as Cassandra (CQL) or
MongoDB now or planned in the future for userdb and passdb lookups?
2015 May 14
1
v2.2.17 Segfault
Hi,
I'm using libexec/dovecot/imap via a ssh tunnel. 2.2.17 segfaults while
accessing a NULL pointer. The following change fixes it for me:
--- dovecot-2.2.17/src/lib-imap/imap-keepalive.c 2015-05-03 11:12:11.000000000 +0200
+++ dovecot-2.2.17/src/lib-imap/imap-keepalive.c 2015-05-14 20:06:29.490617405 +0200
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
{
unsigned int addr;
+ if (!ip)
+ return FALSE;
if
2015 Jul 20
0
Problems with IMAP/POP and dovecot director on backend (director_proxy_maybe)
Hello dovecot community,
first of all: dovecot ist great! ;) ...nevertheless I?ve got some
problems to get my director scenario running as needed/expected :(
My scenario:
I?d like to configure two dovecot backends, without the need for
multiple dovecot instances. Both backend servers are active/active and
act on top of a glusterfs storage, which implies the need for dovecot
director. As
2015 May 10
1
v2.2.17 release candidate released
On 10 May 2015, at 11:47, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> wrote:
> Ok we have some (well, lots actually) of coredumps now:
>
> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> #0 0x00007f4834fcc222 in fts_user_get_data_lang (user=0x16c7900)
> at fts-user.c:302
Thanks, this should fix it: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/fddd3dbdf987
2015 May 11
1
Released Pigeonhole v0.4.8.rc1 for Dovecot v2.2.17.rc1
On 5/11/2015 9:26 AM, Dominik Breu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> did an test Install on my system get some nice SEGFAULT
> wich backtrace here: https://dominikbreu.de/Stikked/view/8b6b7e5b
> version is following:
> aptitude versions dovecot-sieve i 2:2.2.17~rc1-1~auto+4
I cannot view that URL (some broken SSL error). You can just put the
backtrace in the email itself.
Regards,
2015 May 10
0
v2.2.17 release candidate released
On 10/05/2015 5:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> How do I go about debugging this further? How do I go about
>> getting a backtrace on what is essentially a child process that
>> doesn't produce a core? (Note that my installation normally does
>> produce cores when it crashes, so there's something different about
>> these indexer processes..)
>
> One