similar to: Mapping other Inbox method (symlink vs ACL)

Dear Steffen, Thanks for your feedback. Appreciate it. By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink will allow these features. ACL does support such features. Only problem is that I have to setacl for individual boxes (ie Inbox,Sent,Junk etc.) On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Dear Steffan, Noted. Thanks for your feedback! Best Regards Kevin On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 6 May 2015, Kevin Laurie wrote: > >> By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink >> will allow these features. > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 5 May 2015, Kevin Laurie wrote: > I am trying to map a account(bob at mydomain.com) to help at mydomain.com. I > would like him to see/access Inbox,Sent,Junk,Trash of > help at mydomain.com . What would you reckon would be the best way to do > this? ACL or Symlink? to suggest a "best way" we would need to know more

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 6 May 2015, Kevin Laurie wrote: > By permission I mean (read, write, look-up seen). I dont think symlink > will allow these features. Symlinks grant all IMAP permissions, the filesystem level permits. That is, with symlinks you cannot selectivly deny permissions easily. > ACL does support such features. > Only problem is that

Hi Steffan, How do I specify the entire mailbox? I only use ACL via telnet. I tried to use *(wildcard) to indicate entire mailbox but I guess that does not work. Will keep looking but appreciate if you could advise briefly. Thanks Kevin On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Kevin Laurie <superinterstellar at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Steffan, > Noted. Thanks for your feedback! > Best