similar to: Option to not add "Received" header ?

Hi everyone, I use Dovecot in lmtp mode to receive mails. I would like an option to tell Dovecot to not add a "Reveived" header on each server (I use a director, so Director also adds this header). Is it possible to do this ? Or could it be a future feature ? Thank you. Florent

Thank you for your report, we'll look into it! Aki > On December 27, 2017 at 8:16 PM Florent B <florent at coppint.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > This repository does not work with Aptly. > It seems "architecture" line is wrong in InRelease file (needs to be > "Architectures:" instead of "Architecture:"). > And

Hi all, I have two nodes, connected to a switch, using Tinc 1.1 from git. They connect each other with sptps, and to other nodes in the Internet with old protocol because they have Tinc 1.0. There is no problem with remote nodes, but between my 2 local nodes, they see 1518 PMTU. But local network is 1500 MTU !!! So nodes can ping each other but larger data does not go. test1=sllm1 test2=sllm2

Hi all, I tried Tinc 1.1 from git on 4 nodes, each one in a datacenter. They were able to ping each other, etc... but I had problem with multicast, nothing seemed to pass (all is OK with Tinc 1.0.23). I checked logs and on every nodes I have a lot of: Failed to decrypt and verify packet And Error while decrypting: error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0) So I get back to 1.0.23 which works

Hi all, Following the instructions noted at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/Pipe , I am trying to make use of the Pigeonhole sieve pipe plugin to execute an application with custom arguments via my test sieve script: require ["vnd.dovecot.pipe"]; if address :is "to" "test at example.com" { pipe :args [ "first-arg",

Hi Stephan Thank you for your reply. I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 packaged with ubuntu packages: dovecot-managesieved ?1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.1 ? amd64 ? ? ? ?secure POP3/IMAP server - ManageSieve server dovecot-sieve ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.1 ? amd64 ? ? ? ?secure POP3/IMAP server - Sieve filters support If I'm not mistaken Pigeonhole is part of those packages. Regards -- Krzysztof Witek

On 7 December 2015 at 17:20, Florent B <florent at coppint.com> wrote: > I have a cluster of 5 nodes, running Proxmox 4, and Tinc as "virtual > switch" for my nodes : on each node, a bridge "vmbr1" where Tinc is > connected, provides me a secured network for my VMs (connected to that > bridge). > > When I move (hot move) a VM from a host to another, I

Hello, I have been told on Freenode's #dovecot to ask here. I have Exim 4.92 complaining about "Non-CRLF-terminated header, under CHUNKING: message abandoned" with redirects made by Pigeonhole 0.5.5 (with Dovecot 2.3.5.1). Please find relevant part of the traffic below, and help me determine whether Exim is correct on this. ? 0x0000:? 4500 0954 0000 4000 8006 0000 7f00 0001? E..T..

Hello Dovecot users, Unfortunately, Pigeonhole v0.4.4 had a rather big issue with error handling and the execution of the implicit keep. This problem presented itself for example when users exceeded their quota. This did not result in the proper rejection message. This is why I quickly release a new version. Changelog v0.4.5: + Added a Pigeonhole version banner to doveconf output. This way,

Hello Dovecot users, Unfortunately, Pigeonhole v0.4.4 had a rather big issue with error handling and the execution of the implicit keep. This problem presented itself for example when users exceeded their quota. This did not result in the proper rejection message. This is why I quickly release a new version. Changelog v0.4.5: + Added a Pigeonhole version banner to doveconf output. This way,

Hello Florent, How did you proceed with the upgrade? Did you follow the recommended steps guide to upgrade ceph? (mons first, then OSDs, then MDS) Did you interrupt dovecot before upgrading the MDS specially? Did you remount the filesystem? Did you upgrade the ceph client too? Give people the complete scene and someone might be able to help you. Ask on ceph-users list too. Regards, Webert

Hi, I'm trying to use this expression in Sieve, but for some reason the filter doesn't work: require ["fileinto","regex"]; # rule:[gmail-outlook-yahoo-aol-friends] if header :regex "received" ".from.*(outbound.protection.outlook.com|.google.com|.yahoo.com|mx.aol.com)." { fileinto "INBOX.gmail-hotmail-yahoo-aol-friends";

Hi -- I can't get current dovecot and pigeonhole compiled; compilation stops with: | sieve-ldap-db.h:19:10: fatal error: 'ldap.h' file not found Ok, because my dovecot isn't compiled with ldap (--without-ldap), I tried to apply "--with-ldap=no" with configure as advertised in the INSTALL file of pigeonhole, but without success: [...] | ./sieve-ldap-db.h:19:10: fatal

In order to simplify auto-response suppression and other filtering, I want to synthesise an Auto-Submitted header on notification mails that should have them but do not. In a sieve file I add the following: if anyof ( header :contains ["From","Sender"] ?info at example.com" ) { if header :contains "Subject" [" just joined "," just left

Hi i have a problem compiling as mantioned on object of this mail: i'm changing dovecot on my debian 6 from version 2.2.32 to 2.2.36 and pigeonhole from 0.4.20 to 0.4.24 this is output of dovecot -n for listing versions installed dovecot -n # 2.2.32 (dfbe293d4): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.20 (7cd71ba) # OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.10 i have

Hi! We are pleased to release Pigeonhole release v0.5.7. Tarball is available at https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.7.tar.gz https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.7.tar.gz.sig Binary packages are available at https://repo.dovecot.org/ Changes ------- + vacation: Made the subject for the automatic response message produced ?

Hi! We are pleased to release Pigeonhole release v0.5.7. Tarball is available at https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.7.tar.gz https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.7.tar.gz.sig Binary packages are available at https://repo.dovecot.org/ Changes ------- + vacation: Made the subject for the automatic response message produced ?

hi, After following some examples and searching for sieve samples in this ml history, I'm quite sure that the following sieve snippet should give no surprises: if header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" "X-Header-Name" "0.99" { /* do something */ } However the Pigeonhole Sieve 0.2.3 on dovecot 2.0.14 gives me following error: test: line 3:

> On October 20, 2017 at 12:37 PM Florent B <florent at coppint.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > We use Dovecot packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/. > > Could it be possible to serve it with HTTPS ? > > Thank you. > > Florent Hi! It has now https enabled with valid certificate. Aki

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Florent B <florent at coppint.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I already posted about this issue, but I can't find the old thread. > > I have a cluster of 5 nodes, running Proxmox 4, and Tinc as "virtual > switch" for my nodes : on each node, a bridge "vmbr1" where Tinc is > connected, provides me a secured network