similar to: IP drop list

On 03/04/2015 09:45 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: > On 03/04/2015 03:37 PM, Oliver Welter wrote: >> Am 04.03.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Dave McGuire: >>> Am 04.03.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: >>>> Please add [DNSBL] support to iptables instead of Dovecot. It's a waste of >>>> effort to code it into every application that listens on the network.

Am 04.03.2015 um 21:45 schrieb Dave McGuire: > On 03/04/2015 03:37 PM, Oliver Welter wrote: >>>>> I would like to reiterate Reindl Harald's point above, since subsequent >>>>> discussion has gotten away from it. If Dovecot had DNS RBL support >>>>> similar to Postfix, I think quite a few people would use it, and >>>>> thereby

Am 04.03.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Dave McGuire: > On 03/04/2015 02:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> I would like to reiterate Reindl Harald's point above, since subsequent >>> discussion has gotten away from it. If Dovecot had DNS RBL support >>> similar to Postfix, I think quite a few people would use it, and thereby >>> defeat the scanners far more

Hey folks. Suddenly I'm getting lots and lots of messages like this in my logs: Jun 19 14:47:31 <hostname> dovecot: [ID 583609 local0.error] imap(<address>): Error: mremap_anon(/var/mail/<domain>/<uname>/mailboxes/INBOX/Trash/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache, 255557632) failed: Not enough space I'm running 2.2.36.1 under Solaris 10 (patched to current) on

On 03/04/2015 02:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> I would like to reiterate Reindl Harald's point above, since subsequent >> discussion has gotten away from it. If Dovecot had DNS RBL support >> similar to Postfix, I think quite a few people would use it, and thereby >> defeat the scanners far more effectively than any other method. It is >> good that other

On 03/04/2015 03:37 PM, Oliver Welter wrote: >>>> I would like to reiterate Reindl Harald's point above, since subsequent >>>> discussion has gotten away from it. If Dovecot had DNS RBL support >>>> similar to Postfix, I think quite a few people would use it, and >>>> thereby >>>> defeat the scanners far more effectively than any

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 Bug ID: 1097 Summary: TARPIT function does not work in ip6tables Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel) Assignee:

hi all i'm trying to get ipfilter set up on my new 5.1-RELEASE box. ipfilter seems to be working fine. i just have a couple of issues that are probably not very serious... one thing is that during network startup at boot, i get the message IPFilter: already initialized repeated 4 times. i think i have everything configured properly my kernel config looks like options IPFILTER options

On March 2, 2015 10:50:59 PM Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote: > On 03/02/2015 05:34 AM, Joseph Tam wrote: > >>> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/AllowNets its not a big hint its not called denynets is it ? > I myself just want a mechanism to deny certain IP addresses when I > spot them, regardless of the implementation. But

Hello I am trying to set up a backup server running Solaris 8 with rsync 2.5.5 and ipfilter the latest version. The problem i have is i have about 16 different interfaces that are secured via ipfilter , and i tried running rsync via rsh but ipfilter would not set up a keepstate with rsh which meant i had to open up and that is not acceptable. So what i tried then was via ssh and that worked fine

Can anyone tell me if it is possible to encode music in an "interlaced" format.. perhaps I should explain what I mean by this. Say I'm getting 1k/sec off some guy's modem on opennap. It would be sweet if I could listen to the song as it is downloading but obviously the quality is gunna suck. So suppose the song was encoded in this interlaced fashion, I would be able to

Hi. On my FreeBSD 4.8 configured IPFW2+IPF+IPNAT and I use them all: - IPFW - traffic accounting, shaping, balancing and filtering; - IPFilter - policy routing; - IPNAT - masquerading. I want to know, how IP-packets flow through all of this components? What's the path? incoming: IPFW Layer2 -> IPFW&Dummynet -> IPNAT -> IPFilter ? outgoing: IPFW Layer2 ->

I want to run a non-global zone as a virtual router and run ipnat inside the non-global zone, however, when I try to enable routing it can''t find route:default or network/ipfilter. I''m using exclusive IP inside the zones and using OpenSolaris 2008.11 build 110. I''ve tried sparse root and whole root zones without success. I''ve read blogs and posts and

On 3/4/2015 12:45 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: > There is. But I already have a firewall, running on bulletproof > hardware that doesn't depend on spinning disks. I don't want to add > ANOTHER firewall when I already have a perfectly good one. Besides, my > mail server is built for...serving mail. Not being a firewall. You can implement whatever type of security you are

Hi! I'm trying to increase security on my FreeBSD 4.8 firewall/DSL router/VPN router. My problem is with firewalling the VPN part. I'm using a tunnel to a RedHat 7.1 box running FreeS/WAN. This tunnel allows traffic from my internal net (172.17.0.0/24) to that box only: spdadd 172.17.0.0/24 $REDHAT/32 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/$MYADDR-$REDHAT/unique; spdadd $REDHAT/32 172.17.0.0/24

TB --- 2003-07-21 05:27:28 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-07-21 05:27:28 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-07-21 05:33:30 - building world TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>>

TB --- 2003-10-02 04:00:01 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-10-02 04:00:01 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-10-02 04:07:38 - building world TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>>

Hi, I have a 4.7-RELEASE system. I used the following cvsupfile to update my system: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs *default tag=RELENG_4_8 *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all *default tag=. I then proceeded to do: cd /usr/src make buildworld I got a bunch of errors which occurred when building kdump:

TB --- 2003-10-02 04:44:07 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-10-02 04:44:07 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-10-02 04:49:12 - building world TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>>

No it is one Sun solaris 8 box trying to back up several aix boxes.But apparantly it is not possible to disable the encryption so I was hoping that I could use another -e like ftp or something like that thru rsync. But I cannot seem to get to work. Regards Boris -----Original Message----- From: Jim Kleckner [mailto:jek-rsync@kleckner.net] Sent: 15. januar 2003 19:47 To: Boris Gegenheimer Cc: