similar to: Geting mail quota exceeded with plenty of space

Further checkings shows another user also getting "Quota exceeded". This user has only 127Mb toward his quota. Only these two users have this problem. So far. Both are infrequent mail checkers. On 02/09/2015 03:14 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have a user that is getting mail quota exceeded: > > > Feb 9 15:00:21 z9m9z dovecot: lda(dm at htt-consult.com): Error:

> Further checkings shows another user also getting "Quota exceeded". This > user has only 127Mb toward his quota. Only these two users have this > problem. So far. Both are infrequent mail checkers. It might be the quota for number of messages : Check with "doveadm quota get -u user at domain.example" If there is a limit for number of messages. Regards, --

> that was it. Emptied trash and mail flowing. How is the message # > quota managed? I never encountered it before. > > But don't have time today to dig into it. conference call coming up. You might have messages quota configured somewhere. And for : > doveadm(root): Fatal: Unknown command 'quota', but plugin quota >exists. Try to set mail_plugins=quota See

On 02/09/2015 03:37 PM, Bertrand Caplet wrote: >> Further checkings shows another user also getting "Quota exceeded". This >> user has only 127Mb toward his quota. Only these two users have this >> problem. So far. Both are infrequent mail checkers. > It might be the quota for number of messages : Could be. dm has over 9k of trashed messages. but.. > Check

On 02/09/2015 03:37 PM, Bertrand Caplet wrote: >> Further checkings shows another user also getting "Quota exceeded". This >> user has only 127Mb toward his quota. Only these two users have this >> problem. So far. Both are infrequent mail checkers. > It might be the quota for number of messages : that was it. Emptied trash and mail flowing. How is the message

> doveadm(root): Fatal: Unknown command 'quota', but plugin quota exists. > Try to set mail_plugins=quota Show me your doveconf -n without your passwords. -- CHUNKZ.NET - script kiddie and computer technician Bertrand Caplet, Flers (FR) Feel free to send encrypted/signed messages Key ID: FF395BD9 GPG FP: DE10 73FD 17EB 5544 A491 B385 1EDA 35DC FF39 5BD9 -------------- next part

On 02/09/2015 04:04 PM, Bertrand Caplet wrote: >> that was it. Emptied trash and mail flowing. How is the message # >> quota managed? I never encountered it before. >> >> But don't have time today to dig into it. conference call coming up. > You might have messages quota configured somewhere. > And for : >> doveadm(root): Fatal: Unknown command

On 12/15/2014 at 12:26 PM, "Bertrand Caplet" <bertrand.caplet at chunkz.net> wrote: > >> that I needed: >> >> namespace inbox { >> inbox = yes >> } > >Hey, >I wonder where do you have set this namespace inbox ? in 10- >mail.conf ? > The word 'namespace' does not appear in any file within the tree of /etc/dovecot/

On 11/23/2014 05:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 23.11.2014 um 23:30 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >> On 11/23/2014 04:45 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: >>> Am 23.11.2014 um 22:33 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>>> no idea what you are talking about >>>> >>>> K9 is a android client and works fine with TLS >>>> >>>> no idea what

Hello all, I did an install following a HOWTO document that has a fair number of positive reviews, but something went wrong along the way: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-configure-a-mail-server-using-postfix-dovecot-mysql-and-spamassasin I made a couple deviations. I opted to not use StartSSL keys, and decided to stay with the default keys. Also, I chose to use

Hi all, I currently have one dovecot 2.2.15 working and I would like to add a second master server. If I configure the second server and enable the dsync in both servers, the sync will copy everything from A to B ? I mean, B server won't remove messages in A as it doesn't have anything in its users mailbox? The second master server will be a cold server just for contingency. Thanks

Hi, Am 13.12.2014 um 22:26 schrieb Stephan Bosch: > On 12/4/2014 12:03 AM, Jan Wide? wrote: >> Hi, >> according to changelog 2.2.rc3, dsync should replicate sieve scripts. Do >> I need turn on or switch some option(s), for this to work? Replication >> of mailboxes works great, only sieve scripts not. >> > > What version of Pigeonhole is this? It doesn't

Hi, Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> schrieb: >[...] > >so suse people may upgrade to sieve pigeonhole latest, contact them via >mail etc >[...] I sent a mail to one of the Maintainers (darix) and they updated only an hour later - very nice guy. After the following upgrade, the sieve-scripts are replicated - very good. Best regards Hanns Mattes

Hi Is there a way to know if a message has been dowloaded via pop3 and not seen via imap ?

Hi Hardy, I had over 1600 folders, writing manually doveadm mailbox delete would be a real pain. I guess I could script it but that's even more of a pain. It would be nice if there was a command to remove empty mailboxes or something similar. On 22 March 2015 at 07:50, Hardy Flor <HFlor at gmx.de> wrote: > Hello Samuel, > > with mdbox as Maildir no direct file operations

Abwesenheitsnotiz: [Asterisk-Users] oh323 geting voice problem g729 xeon 2.8 , fedora 1 , asterisk 1.0.6Hi All I am using oh323 with 6.6 virsion , and runing under xeon 2.8 dual with 2 gb ram, with g729 for i686 , (fedora 1). my problem is sip - oh323 - h323 (quintum) - pstn , sip party can listen otherparty realtime voice , but other party geting sip party's voice 1 sec later (not

How does LLVM-GCC emit the correct size for structures? Is structure packing part of the "platform specific" magic that GCC knows, or is there some "portable" way to put a structure size into LLVM byte code? Actually, I don't care if it is portable, as long as LLVM has some way to compute it for me, and I don't have to know about the underlying platform. Thanks,

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 17:56 -0400, Evan Jones wrote: > How does LLVM-GCC emit the correct size for structures? Is structure > packing part of the "platform specific" magic that GCC knows, or is > there some "portable" way to put a structure size into LLVM byte code? > > Actually, I don't care if it is portable, as long as LLVM has some way > to compute

I wanted to create a list with the names of variables and their values. So I wrote the following function. add.to.list.names.vars.1 <- function(lnv, vnv) { i <- 1 while (i < length(vnv)) { z <- as.character(eval(substitute(quote(vnv[i+1])))[[2]][[i + 2]]) lnv[[vnv[i]]] <- list(Name = z, Value = vnv[i+1]) i <- i + 2 } lnv } It works, but it is very

I am very new to R. I was trying to load some publicly available Expression data in to R. I used the following commands mydata<-read.table("dataALLAMLtrain.txt", header=TRUE, sep ="\t",row.names=NULL) It reads data without any error Now if I use edit(mydata) It shows only 3916 entries, whereas the actual file contains 7129 entries) My data is something like Gene Description