similar to: pigeonhole ereject vs reject

On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > and what would that change? > nothing if you think about how mail works! > > * the MTA receives the message > * the MTA confirms with 2xx status code > * later the delivery server rejects > * the MTA *must* create a bounce > > just don't reject mails after you confirmed you

On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD > > why do you want the burden of keep the SMTP session with the client open until the mail is

Am 14.01.2015 um 01:28 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > Currently pigeonhole supports reject which would generate a NDR for each message. (If I understand the current documentation) > > Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back to the primary MTA to reject the delivery rather than generating more back scatter NDRs and what would that change? nothing if you think about how

Am 14.01.2015 um 02:23 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> and what would that change? >> nothing if you think about how mail works! >> >> * the MTA receives the message >> * the MTA confirms with 2xx status code >> * later the delivery server rejects >> * the MTA

Am 14.01.2015 um 02:40 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD >> >> why do you want the burden of

Per RFC 8501 seciont 2.2 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8501 I have attempted to use a wildcard on a /64 boundary within a zonefile for NSD, but it doesn't not appear to work. PTR lookups fail... tested with, ie: $ORIGIN 1.1.0.0.8.5.1.b.2.2.5.2.ip6.arpa. * PTR my.fqdn.net. Did not work... or would you have to use? (not tested) *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* PTR .... --

I have configured autoexpunge on some folders: namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Junk { auto = subscribe autoexpunge = 30 days special_use = \Junk } mailbox Trash { auto = subscribe autoexpunge = 2 weeks special_use = \Trash } prefix = separator = / } After adding these and restarting, logging in and out several times, I still see messages

We have the requirement to provide SSL on some IP addresses, but not others on our servers. Providing SSL is the easy part and we're able to use multiple SSL certificates now. (thanks Timo!) All is working ok, but we several IP hosts that do not require SSL and do not have valid certificates. While we can limit access via a firewall ACL to TLS connect ports (993/995) we can't do so on

On Dec 22, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Teemu Huovila <teemu.huovila at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > The autoexpunge feature does not check the \Deleted flag. > > Are any errors logged in "doveadm log errors"? Could you post your complete output of doveconf -n please. That?s what I thought. If I run expunge from doveadm manually, it will work as expected. I just never seem to get

I have a rather busy Apache 2.2 server; tons of small & some large requests. It's a standard Dell 2650 server using the bge (broadcom) network driver. I seem to have a rather strange problem where after just a day or so Apache just stops processing new connections. You can connect to port 80, but trying to get Apache to process any data just hangs. There is nothing strange in

Samba organizers might want to look into this: [ns1:~] dig 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28005 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUESTION SECTION:

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Dominik Breu <dominik at dominikbreu.de> wrote: > the autoexpunge feature only removes mails wich have the \Delete Flag so no deletion of mails wich doesn't have this Flag(see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4315#section-2.1 or http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Expunge) > > you could run a cron job with a doveadm move comando to move the

In reading the Dovecot NFS WIKI entry: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS It mentions a FreeBSD NFS client caching bug. I believe that bug only exists pre-8.x ? It seems that a patch in the PR notes was MFC'd and made it into 8.x at some point. (at least I checked the source in 8.3 and it was there). So I assume that FreeBSD 8.x mitigates the issue? Maybe not? So our deployment is multi

On 1/1/2015 4:17 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Robert Blayzor <rblayzor.bulk at inoc.net> wrote: >>> Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification times of >>> the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is somewhat >>> unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would explain your problem. >>>

Post Office wrote: > Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: > > Jonathan DEL CAMPO /jdc/ .Y (Mailbox or Conference is full.) Would one of the list admins PLEASE remove this guy from the list? I've been getting NDRs from him for as long as I can remember... -- Best regards, Charles

A bit off topic, but I was wondering if anyone here has a solution for centrally managing sieve for multiple users from a custom web application? We would like to implement pigeonhole sieve on our dovecot cluster, however we need to be able to access user?s sieve configurations from a central location for troubleshooting and support purposes.

> On August 5, 2016 at 6:47 PM "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters at domblogger.net> wrote: > > > On 08/05/2016 08:41 AM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > > Is there a way to configure Dovecot to perhaps filter/enforce which passwords are accepted before authenticating? > > > > Ie: Reject immediately (without a database lookup) if password is not X characters in

This may be more of a CPanel issue than Dovecot but CPanel uses Dovecot and not sure if this is a knob we have available in Dovecot or we need to reach out to Cpanel directly to see if this is some custom code they added to their distros. Anyway, W/R/T emails sent with dtails/ + addresses ie: foo+bar at mydomain.com And with LDA/LMTP, in Cpanel by default the detials part, in this case

BIND has a handy feature $GENERATE directive in zone files that allows you to handle large ranges of things like PTR/A records without having to actually create long lists in very large zonefiles. This was handy for things like IPv4/v6 PTR's and matching A/AAAA records for large dynamic hosts, etc. Does NSD support any type of range generation such at this? -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP:

On 3/20/23 13:41, Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users wrote: > Hi Robert, > > NSD doesn't understand the GENERATE directive. You'll have to create > your zone files using a script or template engine. Understood but certainly not helpful with large dynamic IPv6 PTR's... Not that dynamic hosts NEED PTR's, but would still be nice to have. -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: