Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Dovecot replication - notify not working"
2015 Feb 10
0
Slow replication
Hi,
I'm running two Dovecot 2.2.9 Servers running replication. Users are the
same.
My Replication is very slow. Mails from Server one appear on Server two
after 1-3 hours. Rarely i can see duplicated mails (Log message "Expunged
message reappeared. Setting new UID").
This is my doveconf -n output:
> # 2.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> # OS: Linux 3.13.0-44-generic x86_64
2015 Feb 12
0
Dovecot dsync not replicating ".dovecot.sieve -> .sieve/managesieve.sieve" / setactive
Am 12.02.2015 um 15:47 schrieb Martin ?tefany:
> Hello,
>
> I've ran into problem with Dovecot and dsync replication. Everything
> works perfectly, including replication of sieve scripts, except fact
> that if user activates the 'managesieve' ruleset (I'm using currently
> Roundcubemail) on "mail1" host, it wouldn't be activated on
2015 Feb 12
2
Dovecot dsync not replicating ".dovecot.sieve -> .sieve/managesieve.sieve" / setactive
Hello,
I've ran into problem with Dovecot and dsync replication. Everything
works perfectly, including replication of sieve scripts, except fact
that if user activates the 'managesieve' ruleset (I'm using currently
Roundcubemail) on "mail1" host, it wouldn't be activated on "mail2"
host, by creating symlink ".dovecot.sieve ->
2016 Dec 06
0
Panic: file dsync-mailbox-tree-sync.c: line 576 (node_mailbox_trees_cmp): assertion failed: (ret != 0)
Hi,
Here is a crash that's happening using the latest Dovecot version
(v2.2.27 on CentOS7 x86_64):
We are using replication. Judging by the second server's logs, I believe
this has something to do with the fact that we're using the lazy_expunge
plugin.
Every night after midnight, we purge the lazy_expunge namespace by
running a command similar to following one on the main server
2019 Sep 19
1
fts_solr: Error: fts_solr: received invalid uid '0'
Hi,
> Am 16.09.2019 um 09:39 schrieb Daniel Miller <dmiller at amfes.com>:
>
> On 9/13/2019 1:21 AM, Fabian via dovecot wrote:
>> Hi,
>> we are trying to add full text search functionality with Solr to our Doveoct setup. Our Versions:
>> OS: Debian 9
>> Tried versions:
>> - Dovecot 2.2.7 with Solr 3.6
>> - Dovecot 2.3.4 with Solr 8.2
>>
2017 Dec 14
0
Panic: file imap-client.c: line 1204 (client_handle_input): assertion failed: (o_stream_is_corked(client->output))
Running Dovecot from the daily builds: 2:2.3.0~alpha0-1~auto+1287 in
an proxy setup:
auth_mechanisms = plain login
default_vsz_limit = 1 G
imapc_host = <redacted>.charite.de
imapc_port = 993
imapc_ssl = imaps
imapc_ssl_verify = no
listen = *,::
mail_gid = imapproxy
mail_home = /home/imapproxy/%u
mail_location = imapc:~/imapc
mail_plugins = mail_log notify
mail_uid = imapproxy
passdb {
2017 May 31
2
Bug with 2.2.29-1~auto+25 back to haunt me
After upgrading from 2.2.28-1~auto+45 to 2.2.29-1~auto+25 I'm gettings
this:
May 31 16:44:31 mproxy dovecot: auth: Fatal: passdb imap: Cannot verify certificate without ssl_ca_dir or ssl_ca_file setting
May 31 16:44:31 mproxy dovecot: master: Error: service(auth): command startup failed, throttling for 8 secs
May 31 16:44:31 mproxy dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: Auth process broken
2010 Dec 06
1
pam_time.so and /etc/security/time.conf
I am investigating how to limit user logins via sshd to specific
times of day. I have the basic syntax but what I want to know is how
does pam_time.so process time.conf.
Say I have a clutch of users that should login between 07:00 and
18:00 Monday to Friday. I infer that the following will handle
that:
sshd;*;*,Wk0700-1800
However, what is not clear to me is how does one permit certain
2012 Aug 30
0
storage mode error question (R2winBUGS)
Hi all,
I've been trying to run a model using R2winBUGS, and recurrently I
get the message:
"Error in FUN(X[[3L]], ...) :
invalid to change the storage mode of a factor"
My model is the following:
sink("GLMM_Poisson.txt")
cat("
model{
mu~dnorm(0,0.01)
beta1~dnorm(-1,1)
for(j in 1:nsite){
alpha[j]~dnorm(mu.alpha,tau.alpha)
}
mu.alpha~dnorm(0,0.01)
2020 Feb 19
14
Unable to get primary group information when using AD authentication with samba-4.10.4
Hi,
When using AD authentication from a rhel8.1 environment with samba-4.10.4 installed, information on the primary group group01 set on
the AD side for any user user01 cannot be obtained.
[root @ rhel8_1 ~] # id user01
uid=2001107(user01) gid=2000513(domain users) groups=2000513(domain users),2001107(oec0814e),2001103(group01)
If you perform the same operation on the same AD from the
2017 Mar 20
2
Can't verify remote server certs without trusted CAs (ssl_client_ca_* settings)
* Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>:
> Could you send us the gdb bt full backtrace for the core file?
Currently I can't get it to create coredumps
doveconf -n:
# 2.2.devel (3f97702): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.4.devel (023f391)
# OS: Linux 4.4.0-65-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
auth_mechanisms = plain login
default_vsz_limit = 1 G
imapc_host =
2016 Jul 12
2
Failed to find domain Unix Group
Hello!
My User is only in AD, the passwd see some User (system) with high GID
in the same range of Samba
Example:
statd: x: 108: 65534 :: / var / lib / nfs: / bin / false
My fear is that change again and lose everything again permissions,
which had to redo everything ...
Thank you
Em 12-07-2016 16:21, Rowland penny escreveu:
> On 12/07/16 20:03, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote:
>> Hello!
2006 Feb 02
0
Mbox Problems Dovecot
Hi all,
Is anybody have this problem with Centos 4.2, postfix-2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4,
dovecot-0.99.11-2.EL4.1
In the log /var/log/maillog have:
Feb 2 08:44:44 net02 pop3(user01): Error indexing mbox file
/var/mail/user01: LF not found where expected
Feb 2 08:45:14 net02 pop3(user01): Error indexing mbox file
/var/mail/user01: LF not found where expected
Feb 2 08:45:14 net02 pop3(user01): Error
2016 Jul 12
0
Failed to find domain Unix Group
On 12/07/16 20:03, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote:
> Hello!
>
> My file server is running ubuntu samba 4.3.0 and today started the
> problem that my IDs have changed and this caused countless problems.
> In the logs I have the following:
>
> Jul 12 15:57:07 samba fileserver winbindd [1141] [07.12.2016 15: 57:
> 07.605992, 0] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_group.c:45(fill_grent)
2017 Mar 03
2
welcome plugin
Hello,
Thank you. My configuration is below. It looks like a perm problem,
i've set +r on the directory and it is readable.
One other thing I noticed when going through the log the testuser logs
in, then logs out. Then logs in again, and then gets the error. Any
ideas why the two logins? I see this all the time, a log in log out,
then another log in log out then the email transaction.
2018 Apr 23
2
canonicalize_connect_path failed for service
Hi,
Our setup:
Samba (classic) DC: cdr-dc01
Samba (classic) member server: cdr-fs01. This is also a file server
AD realm: CDR.internal
We migrated to AD and came across an issue with accessing shares. The
shares in question worked pre-migrated. i.e using a windows machine a user
was able to access that share. The share in question was locked down to
just that user
Post migration, we are able
2019 Feb 14
0
SMB Signing with "map to guest = " options
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 05:52:13 -0600 (CST)
shivappa Sangapur via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using samba-4.7.x
> I have some confusions over "map to guest=" options with setting SMB
> Signing 1. Set "*Server signing =auto*", "*map to guest=bad uid*" and
> set "client signing in windows 2k12 server group
2004 Apr 13
3
scp problem
RCSID("$OpenBSD: scp.c,v 1.113 2003/11/23 23:21:21 djm Exp $");
Part of the OpenSSH_3.8p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.7c 30 Sep 2003 distribution
Could someone verify this case we found that causes a file to be missed during copying?
Here is the setup to replicate the problem:
On hosta /tmp:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user01 group01 0 Apr 13 10:44 file0
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user01
2013 Oct 15
0
"Perfect Forward Secrecy" on Redhat/Fedora
RHEL/CentOS 6.5 will support ECDHE
Fedora currently makes the turnaround
no wonder that i burned down many hours:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019390
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901#c108
______________________________
recent dovecot with also support older clients but
perfer best possible encryption for modern ones
ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = yes
2018 Apr 23
0
canonicalize_connect_path failed for service
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:48:15 +1000
Rob Thoman via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our setup:
>
> Samba (classic) DC: cdr-dc01
> Samba (classic) member server: cdr-fs01. This is also a file server
> AD realm: CDR.internal
>
> We migrated to AD and came across an issue with accessing shares. The
> shares in question worked pre-migrated. i.e