similar to: dsync summary?

Anyone know what this means and what the implications are? Does this mean some messages are missing? $sudo dsync -D -v -f -R -o mail_fsync=never backup -u test imapc: ... dsync(test): Error: imapc: Remote server didn't send BODY[] for UID 266 in #somefolder -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly selected tag:

Hello List, i have a simple and maybe stupid question but, read the guide on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync now i wonder where to put this configuration ? May i oversee something but i would appreciate any hint toward solving my problem. regards, dominik

I'm trying to use dsync to mirror mail onto a remote IMAP server. The remote server is generating an error that authentication via plain text is not permitted. Does dsync imapc support any non-clear-text authentication mechanisms? The remote server supports: AUTH=CRAM-MD5 AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=NTLM -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself

Thanks very much; please see in-line for clarification questions. At 8:22 AM +0100 11/28/14, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Randall Gellens wrote: > >> I'm still having trouble getting users accepted by postfix + dovecot. > > I suppose in your system + virtual user mix, you should use LMTP: > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP > So

I have a new Dovecot v2.2.9 installation and am having trouble getting virtual users recognized. Also, the example configuration listed on the Wiki generates config errors. Note that I haven't tried running dovecot yet, I wanted to verify that the config looked good first. First, my configuration. I'm trying to use /etc/dovecot/users as my combined userdb and passdb file, with all

If anyone's interested, especially client developers. It's been a bit quiet there after the initial rush. Begin forwarded message: > From: Randall Gellens <randy at qualcomm.com> > Date: August 1, 2008 5:08:39 AM EDT > To: ietf-imapext at imc.org, morg at ietf.org > Subject: [MORG] IMAP5 List > > At the MORG BOF, a discussion as to if the proposed IMAP

I'm still having trouble getting users accepted by postfix + dovecot. I have a few (<10) virtual users configured in a passwd-style file in /etc/dovecot/users. I can verify that dovecot sees those users and can authenticate them using 'doveadm' as well as IMAP. I also have one system user configured via PAM. I can verify that dovecot sees this user and can authenticate using

Hello, You guys might want to join this discussion. (And maybe some others too.) On the WhatWG mailing list, there's been a fury of e-mails about adding a <video> element to HTML5. They're talking about codecs and containers now. It might be helpful to have your representatives there. And help shape things. See ya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dave Singer

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Randall Gellens wrote: > I'm still having trouble getting users accepted by postfix + dovecot. I suppose in your system + virtual user mix, you should use LMTP: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP So Dovecot handles the difference itself. > userdb { > args = uid=vmail gid=vmail

I'm still very confused, but I have finally gotten it to recognize all users. What changed from my previous message is that I deleted the static userdb, and added the system user to the /etc/dovecot/users file (but not to the passdb /etc/dovecot/passwd). Oddly, I had to set uid:gid and homedir for each entry in /etc/dovecot/users even though I have these set to default values

At 6:14 PM +0100 12/11/14, Dominik Breu wrote: > i have a simple and maybe stupid question but, > read the guide on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync now i wonder > where to put this configuration ? May i oversee something but i would > appreciate any hint toward solving my problem. Hi Dominik, I'm not sure, but my guess is that it goes into a new file in

Anyone know what this means and what the implications are? dovecot: imap(user) Error: fts_solr: Query didn't return uid -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth, more than ruin, more even than death --Bertrand

On 05/11/15 16:21, Steve Ankeny wrote: > I'm following the instructions here -- > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller > > > I've successfully "tested" my domain controller -- > > adam at eagle:~$ smbclient -L localhost -U% > Domain=[SMBDOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.18-Debian] > >

On 11/05/2015 11:38 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 05/11/15 16:21, Steve Ankeny wrote: >> I'm following the instructions here -- >> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller >> >> >> I've successfully "tested" my domain controller -- >> >> adam at eagle:~$ smbclient -L localhost -U%

Hello, Running dovecot 2.0.11 and pigeonhole on Fedora 14 x86_64. The lda can not seem to find the user's home directory, yet other parts of dovecot (pop3, imap, managesieve) can. Grepping "Effective uid" from /var/log/maillog: Mar 29 11:21:34 new-eagle dovecot: pop3(pete): Debug: Effective uid=726, gid=726, home=/home/pete Mar 29 11:23:18 new-eagle dovecot: imap(pete): Debug:

I'm following the instructions here -- https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller I've successfully "tested" my domain controller -- adam at eagle:~$ smbclient -L localhost -U% Domain=[SMBDOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.18-Debian] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- netlogon

Hi All, New to the list here. I am trying to connect my samba box to an Windows Server 2003 box (yuck). My users want to be able to access shares on the samba box with the same credentials they used to login into the windows domain. Am I correct in thinking this is possible? As far as I can tell from numerous tutorials and docs, I am. Anyway, I downloaded MIT's kerberos5 1.6.1, dod

I'm trying to use a shared public namespace. Clients say it exists, but sieve scripts can't write to it. The configuration in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf: # Shared namespace for Foo stuff namespace { type = public separator = '/' prefix = "#Foo/" location =

I'm trying to use a shared public namespace. My mail client says it exists, and I can telnet in and SELECT it, but sieve scripts can't write to it. The configuration in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf: # Shared namespace for Foo stuff namespace { type = public separator = '/' prefix = "#Foo/" location =

Samba Users: One of my clients is using Samba 2.0.3 on Linux 5.0 with approximately 25 clients. This particular client is an architectural and civil engineering group using AutoCAD R12 for all their drawings. One of the add-on programs the civil engineering techs use is Eagle Point of which they just received an "upgrade". Prior to the upgrade load times were acceptable at about one