similar to: Dovecot v2.2 FTS is not indexing "text/html" emails...

Hi everyone, While examining dovecot versions v2.1 and v2.2 for their lucene search performances, I have noticed a huge difference in the index sizes created by them. Both versions were compiled on same system, against same libclucene, same configure options and were used with same dovecot.conf during run-time. I deleted the lucene-indexes folder and dovecot* files in the Maildir prior to

Hi, I am having the same issue as: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-April/095681.html although I am using the latest dovecot-core and dovecot-lucene packages from the debian sid repo which already has the patch (http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/5e42a8c18b51) mentioned in the above thread implemented. doveadm(admin): Info: Old.All: Caching mails seq=1..300332 9400/300332 Program

Hi, Mailing list archives suggest that this problem has been fixed in the older versions itself but I am getting the error still while trying to doveadm index a large folder of emails. Sometimes it throws error after 30000, something 40000, the latest it gave up after 111000. But it just never completes. 111000/322080doveadm:

Hi, I just want some clarification on how Dovecot's IMAP assigns UIDs when it picks files from the "new" directory of a Maildir. What I am observing is that only ctime has a role to play in it. For example if there are two files in "new", a.msg & z.msg. Even when a.msg has lower mtime than z.msg and "a" comes before "z" alphabetically, dovecot

> Dovecot doesn't look at the new files' mtimes or ctimes, because that > would require stat()ing the file, which slows it down. So it's using > the timestamp in the Maildir filename itself. Thanks Timo for the clarification. Whats Dovecot's strategy when the file-name does not contain a time-stamp and its just a sequential long number such as 1494829006737776656. My

Hi, In continuation to the issue I had posted about long back: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-August/097362.html I did further testing today on a fresh new Debian & latest Dovecot and observed a undesired behavior. I am using fts_lucene & following sequence of commands on a empty test account me at myself.com: doveadm expunge -u 'my at myself.com' mailbox

Do we have a way to keep the user \Seen flags in public folders when an email is moved in another folder? Sample test to reproduce: Step a - UserA and UserB have both read the email in PublicFolderA. Step b - UserA moves the email to PublicFolderB. UserA still sees the email as read (with the \Seen flag), this is expected behaviour and we are ok with this. Step c - UserB sees the email in

Your smb.conf is incorrect/incomplete. Info here on these 2 links. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_rid Your smb.conf > >> [global] > >> max log size = 0 > >> realm = DOMAIN.COM > >> workgroup = DOMAIN > >> security = ADS > >> winbind enum users = yes >

Hi Ralph Thanks a lot. With xattr_tdb I could at least list the files getting rid of access denied error. I still do not see the exactly mapped ACEs in the Security Descriptor of a file in Windows Explorer but I will debug that little further and then come back with questions. I see only 1 entry of Everyone on Windows client side if there are added ACEs using nfs4_setfacl. Let me know if that

Hi, I'm currently running version v2.0.x in production (using Maildir storage) and it's been working well. I'm interested in moving to version 2.2.x and am preparing a test server to do so. As I have been merging the conf file changes between the two versions I noticed syntax changes for the 90-sieve.conf file. There are now 'locations' and presumably to keep referring to

I don't know if this was supposed to have changed with dovecot2, but http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS shows fts = squat solr so, since I have the lucene plugin?"fts = lucene" works by itself?I tried fts = squat lucene but: $ doveadm index '*' doveadm(dave): Error: fts: Failed to initialize backend 'squat lucene': Unknown backend So, is that syntax

On 13 Oct 2015, at 23:25, Akash <akbwiz+dovecot at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Mailing list archives suggest that this problem has been fixed in the > older versions itself but I am getting the error still while trying to > doveadm index a large folder of emails. Sometimes it throws error > after 30000, something 40000, the latest it gave up after 111000. But > it

Hi, I would like to run the -O1 pass sequence followed by -reg2mem from an out of tree project which uses llvm. I am using the following code snippet to do so but in some cases, my method is also vectorising the code, which doesn't happen when running the same sequence(-S -O1 -reg2mem) through opt. Can someone please help me find what I am missing? Thanks, Akash. *

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.13.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.13.rc1.tar.gz.sig There have been a ton of smaller and some larger changes since v2.2.12, so I thought I'd first make a RC release and the final v2.2.13 tomorrow. Please try it out! BTW. I've read most of the mails again in Dovecot mailing list, but there are still a few reported

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.13.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.13.rc1.tar.gz.sig There have been a ton of smaller and some larger changes since v2.2.12, so I thought I'd first make a RC release and the final v2.2.13 tomorrow. Please try it out! BTW. I've read most of the mails again in Dovecot mailing list, but there are still a few reported

I've had squat running on dovecot 2.0 and have been updating all users mailbox indexes nighty via cron with this command: doveadm -v search -A text xyzzyx I've just updated to 2.1 and I'm migrating to lucene indexes, but reading the documentation I'm having a hard time understanding the semantic differences between indexing and rescanning. If I were to continue to run an

Hello Jeremy and Ralph Thanks for your suggestions. I compiled samba-4.8.0 and running it instead of samba-4.6.2. I saw the changes that you mentioned in the latest vfs_nfs4acl_xattr module. The operation not supported error is gone but it is now failing with access denied. Here is what I tried: *[root at test3 ajain]# net conf showshare local[local] path = /home/ajain/mount

Hi all, I am trying to use LLVM's AliasAnalysis pass, but from a standalone tool that uses llvm libraries. The following is the code snippet I am currently using. PassBuilder PB; auto mod_manager = ModuleAnalysisManager { }; PB.registerModuleAnalyses(mod_manager); AAResults& AAR = mod_manager.getResult<AAManager>(*M); But the code fails at .getResult with the following error:

Hi All I found there is one bug in the plugin. The name of the attribute for ACL as per strace output of nfs4_setfacl is *system.nfs4_acl.* The source code has defined it as #define NFS4ACL_XATTR_NAME ( "system.nfs4acl" ) Note there is missing underscore. After this, the EOPNOTSUPP error is not observed. Hope this helps Akash On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:43 PM, Jeremy Allison

Hello All I am trying to use nfs4acl_xattr plugin from samba source code. https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_nfs4acl_xattr.8.html I mounted NFSv4 mount point locally and exported it through samba with vfs objects set to nfs4acl_xattr. *[root at test3 ajain]# net conf showshare local[local] path = /home/ajain/mount comment = local share guest ok =