similar to: CESA-2020:0984 Important CentOS 7 ipmitool Security Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0739 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0739.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 66ff63674bf5b85b9aaac969defe1f0dd6889f5098365df1665533c783a792a2 bmc-snmp-proxy-1.8.13-8.el7_1.noarch.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1879 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1879.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: a59f9402df8b2a324097eb3ebdc7a645dd104f78aba503b98449ee0762b9b11c bmc-snmp-proxy-1.8.13-9.el7_2.noarch.rpm

Jon Pruente wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> The man page isn't helping, nor have I been able to find examples that >> work. >> >> For example, the man page claims I can do ipmitool lan get active, and >> I try, and it says, "invalid lan command, get". > > get isn't a recognized

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > The man page isn't helping, nor have I been able to find examples that > work. > > For example, the man page claims I can do ipmitool lan get active, and I > try, and it says, "invaling lan command, get". > get isn't a recognized subcommand under lan in the ipmitool I have installed.

Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 20:45:44 -0400 From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 05:14:06PM -0400, mark wrote: > >> I do see one option of "defgw macaddr" - is that supposed to be a MAC >> external to the server, or can I use the MAC of eth1 (or whatever the >> stupid, unrememberable name is)? > > As mentioned earlier,

> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:50:55 -0500 > From: Jon Pruente <jpruente at riskanalytics.com> > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 4:10 PM, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> So you're saying I should set the MAC address for the lan channel 1 to >> the MAC address of the second NIC? > > No, you don't do anything to the MAC addresses on the BMC/IPMI. They

Michael C. Tiernan wrote: > ipmitool -I open lan get *NUMBER* > Description: CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core) Release: 7.5.1804 ipmitool -I open lan get 1 Invalid LAN command: get I'm saying that the get command with lan DOES NOT WORK. ipmitool doesn't understand it.... <SNIP> mark

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:1331 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1331 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: fe098e08061bc5f26a3ccf7cf13727bcb81372ed1b075f8f6bb72760b554a839 ipmitool-1.8.15-3.el6_10.i686.rpm x86_64:

The man page isn't helping, nor have I been able to find examples that work. For example, the man page claims I can do ipmitool lan get active, and I try, and it says, "invaling lan command, get". Do I set the MAC address for the lan to NIC 2? Anyone have a clue - I do *not* want martians on the real network. mark

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 07:27:58PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Default Gateway IP : 192.168.0.100 > > Default Gateway MAC : 00:25:90:0a:42:87 > > No, that does not look right. You have configured the gateway of the > IPMI to be the host OS side of the NIC. You can't do that... in a lot > of systems I've seen, the IPMI side of the NIC can't even

Hallo *! I have a board SE7501HG2. - On 2.6.18 ipmitool works succefull. On Xen-3.1 (2.6.18) ipmitool say: # ipmitool sensor WARNING: Unknown SDR repository version 0x00 SDR record id 0x0000: invalid length 0 (see thread [ipmitool-devel] Unknown SDR version) - On page [4] as written: ipmitool -> BMC ---> i2c/smbus ''-> SDR - On Thread [9] was written:

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:0376 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0376 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: db2bbbf46170373e60210f4ad52b8256c87b04d101354cbae47c9e535983c7a9 pcp-4.3.2-4.el7_7.x86_64.rpm ad4f985641251dbaa6ffce06f687f49b011e6962460cb53b530c417948b318f6

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:0848 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0848 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: d885b21d37d53676aafd608538dedfb7ea3ab2999eaab9b671b64fae1d6823d1 pcp-4.3.2-5.el7_7.x86_64.rpm 171f420b752ebe20892c12423d0001cfb3323a79bd4ccab572b11883f29068f2

---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: ipmitool and CentOS 7 From: m.roth at 5-cent.us Date: Mon, May 16, 2016 16:57 To: "CentOS" <centos at centos.org> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Dells running CentOS 6, we could use this command ipmitool delloem lcd set mode userdefined

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:0843 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0843 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 42ba4282857bac58b93900853753527aaa2583a1a77de5c19f536b2cfd9ab400 389-ds-base-1.3.9.1-13.el7_7.x86_64.rpm

Got an older server running 6.5. I've been fighting it - I have two webcams for surveillance of the room; one works with motion, but it resizes the picture down Adjusting resolution from 640x480 to 360x296 and the video's dark and bad contrast. So I went back to the camer I'd been using before that worked fine... on CentOS 5.x, and then I remembered why I'd gone to the other camera

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1814 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1814.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 583c451e1c1759ab60d296f761dd14f97e22107894fbfc8d0825ccc327caa050 ipmitool-1.8.11-12.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1259 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1259.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 2267fa0eb54642d8bbef3878082298e9034e85e6f4a0175c36b8b9724b06f253 ipmitool-1.8.11-16.el6.i686.rpm x86_64: