similar to: CESA-2019:3979 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Along with the recent kernel update (3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7), the CentOS 7 plus kernel was likewise updated. The plus kernel though hasn't shown up in the mirrors yet, while the plain kernel has. Could someone please push the release button for the plus kernel? What I do see in the various random mirrors I've manually checked is the previous plus kernel

Hi, I am writing because I would like to know if centos will update the kernel-rt package from https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel-rt/releases ? I ask because bz#1550584 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550584 mentions "fixed in version kernel-rt-3.10.0-1063.rt56.1023.el7" And the latest tag in "releases" link above is for kernel-rt-3.10.0-1062.7.1.rt56.1030.el7

On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 5:50 AM Albert McCann <albert.mccann at outlook.com> wrote: > > Along with the recent kernel update (3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7), the CentOS 7 plus kernel was likewise updated. The plus kernel though hasn't shown up in the mirrors yet, while the plain kernel has. Could someone please push the release button for the plus kernel? That "someone" is Johnny

Brian Ripley writes today: >> There is already a usable log1p implementation in src/nmath/log1p, for >> platforms without it. All we need to do is to arrange to use it on those >> systems with broken versions. That's not easy without access to such a >> platform to test it, though. I need the same kind of test in my own software, so I made some experiments and

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 Summary: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes phase send_file_entry broken pipe Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

>> I have come across your reported log1p error (#2837) on a NetBSD (1.6W) >> system. I've just made further experiments on the deficient log1p() function on OpenBSD 3.2 and NetBSD 1.6 with this test program: % cat bug-log1p.c #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <math.h> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { int k; double x; for (k = 0; k