similar to: CEBA-2019:1889 CentOS 7 ipa BugFix Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

hi guys do you see the same by any chance? .... --> Processing Dependency: ipa-server-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 for package: python2-ipaserver-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch --> Processing Dependency: ipa-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 for package: python2-ipaserver-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package:

I am trying to build Samba 4.6.4 on an ARM 7 Cortex based router (Netgear R8000), running *DD-WRT v3.0-r31980M kongac (05/11/17)* I'm working with some folks via the DDWRT, but we're running into an issue trying to build from source. I have python 2.7 already installed on the router, and I'm executing the install_with_python.sh script. ./install_with_python.sh /opt/test/samba-4.6.4

On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:43:52 -0400 Zac Morris <zac at zacwolf.com> wrote: > OK, to be extra clear, I *am* now running just: ./configure > > It is this script that is erroring at step: > *Checking uname sysname type* > > It's not a python specific issue. Like I said, this is a minimal linux > build, so many of the de facto apps/headers/libs are not installed. >

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0508 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0508 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: e8f56857df866df8e78c9bdad6fb669761480e2ce4001d1a26ce4a17e74dae8e ipa-client-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.3.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0190 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0190 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 07eacb9ad6ccc18cfd09393d4ce3f599a00de83353241b4cbb816130ef898278 ipa-client-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.x86_64.rpm

​No, sorry, it's actually failing on "configure" which this script calls. I should have been more clear. ./configured is failing at step: ​*Checking uname sysname type* It's obviously missing some app/header/library, but reading through all the breakpoints listed in the error (re-pasted below) I can't make out from the code what it's looking for, and the config.log

Dear all, First of all, Merry Christmas! :) While testing a File I/O sample program, I've encountered a link failure due to missing implementation of "\01__isoc99_fscanf" function. I think this function should be named "__isoc99_fscanf" instead. Please see the program code and LLVM IR generated by DragonEgg and clang below. It shows that clang generates

Hi there I set up a POC domain with multiple DCs, multiple remote sites and samba shares. This POC is a simulation of a whole samba3 domain migration. Users, and groups have been imported from the older domain to the new one. Here's the setup: ("Remote sites" are actually different subnets on the same location for the POC) *Main Site*: DC1 (RHEL7 - samba 4.6.4) DC2 (RHEL7 -

Hello again, Samba experts, sorry for being such a pain in your necks, but I really need to get a recent Samba version to compile, and it looks like I definitely need your help with this. In the meantime, I have found that the huge number of "conflicting types" errors for rpc_*_init(...) is due to the fact that the Samba 4.6.4 codebase seems to have for all RPC modules: NTSTATUS

On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:34:45 +0100 Julien TEHERY via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi there > > I set up a POC domain with multiple DCs, multiple remote sites and > samba shares. This POC is a simulation of a whole samba3 domain > migration. Users, and groups have been imported from the older domain > to the new one. > > Here's the setup: >

I have read several bugs with similar issues on BugZilla concerning 4.6.4 and GTX 970's. I managed a work around by booting to previous kernel release but nouveau wont work with this card. I run two GPUs, so I moved my 760 to primary to at least get a boot, obviously the other screen with this card wont work (just sleeps). I would report this to BugZilla however with the boot failure on

Le 21/11/2018 à 10:13, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:34:45 +0100 > Julien TEHERY via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi there >> >> I set up a POC domain with multiple DCs, multiple remote sites and >> samba shares. This POC is a simulation of a whole samba3 domain >> migration. Users, and groups have been

Debian 4.2.14.. Hmmm. This is why i make the 4.5.x and 4.6.x packages. I suggest, or wait (few hours) and upgrade to my 4.6.4 package or get the 4.5.8 package for my apt now. I'll do the 4.5.10 after the 4.6.4, im moving in office to 4.6.4 due to the many bugfixes ive seen. I'll post on the list when these are ready. Not to long now, if im not typeing here.. ;-) Greetz, Louis

Am 2017-05-24 um 13:33 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Debian 4.2.14.. Hmmm. This is why i make the 4.5.x and 4.6.x packages. > > I suggest, or wait (few hours) and upgrade to my 4.6.4 package or get the 4.5.8 package for my apt now. > I'll do the 4.5.10 after the 4.6.4, im moving in office to 4.6.4 due to the many bugfixes ive seen. > > I'll post on the list

thewolf at xxxthewolf:~/samba$ gpg --import samba-pubkey.asc  gpg: key 6F33915B6568B7EA: "Samba Distribution Verification Key <samba-bugs at samba.org>" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg:              unchanged: 1 thewolf at xxxthewolf:~/samba$ gpg --verify samba-4.6.4.tar.asc  gpg: assuming signed data in 'samba-4.6.4.tar' gpg: Signature made ter 23 mai

hai, can you post to the list, thats beter for everyone. if its an ad dc, then you can not run nmbd. but we need to see your smb.conf to make sure you dont have a configuration error. Greetz, Louis Op 29 jun. 2017 om 11:34 heeft Hénoch Hervé <h.henoch at isc84.org> het volgende geschreven: Hi, I've using your package but i've the following problem : Debian GNU/Linux

Hello Samba experts, due to the "SambaCry" issue (CVE-2017-7494), I am trying to update the Samba server installation on my Thecus NAS (dating back to 2011) from version 3.5.16 to the current 4.6.4. So far, I have successfully * created a cross-compiling toolchain for the NAS (i686-nptl-linux-gnu) based on gcc-5.2 * compiled Python and Samba library dependencies for my

*Resend to the list* Hi, i had the same problem. The Solution was to check the permissions on NC for Enterprise Read-only domain controllers group. Here some additional information: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2022387/troubleshooting-ad-replication-error-8453-replication-access-was-denied. Look at "Fix Invalid Default Security Descriptors" Andrej -----Ursprüngliche

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am painfully aware that this is most likely a problem with my system, but I am nevertheless going to ask if anyone has any ideas/suggestions for diagnosis and trouble-shooting. - From a clean checkout of release 66624 on Ubuntu 12.04 (32-bit, sorry!): gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.4-1ubuntu1~12.04) 4.6.4 svn checkout https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/