similar to: CESA-2018:0151 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0151 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0151.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c6a64e82bef34b589e7bc8a883f815a8 cyrus-sasl-2.1.22-5.el5_4.3.i386.rpm ed8d69dab4601e7826f686738d20a5f5 cyrus-sasl-2.1.22-5.el5_4.3.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0151 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0151.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 88ae6b8e2097886aa9c9dfc98a026433 cyrus-sasl-2.1.22-5.el5_4.3.i386.rpm 957e4a5c6ea882bcade6fa0a1c52ddef cyrus-sasl-devel-2.1.22-5.el5_4.3.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0151 Low Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0151.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 4d992f22dbcf380e7c2e0eb0ba0fa29da4b5a5261abf85bb05fff16551aa2df9 wget-1.12-1.11.el6_5.i686.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:0151 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0151.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0d04ce18e0720742a79233a2bc11461396bd60225c238c9912b7f13be6d78c34 pki-ca-9.0.3-45.el6_7.noarch.rpm

quite possibly more a yum question than a centos question, but i'm a bit confused about the difference between listing "available" packages versus "updates" packages. short example -- listing what the yum man page suggests should be "available" for installation, restricting myself to centosplus: $ yum list available --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=centosplus ...

Hello CentOS users, in the recent time I keep getting the logwatch warnings from my 2 dedicated servers running CentOS 7.4.1708. I guess because of the numerous kernel updates (because of Spectre+Meltdown) in the near past? Could someone please suggest me, which files in my /boot partition would be safe to delete? I would like to avoid the situation of having to boot the rescue partiton etc.

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi All, Please find the requested details: [root at testserver new]# doveconf -n # 2.2.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.4 (Maipo) xfs disable_plaintext_auth = no listen = * log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log mail_location = maildir:/kw/home/pop/%d/%n/Maildir/ passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/passwd driver =

hi all, can someone help explaining what we are seeing? it makes no sense to us. this is a host running centos 7.4 with 3.10.0-693.17.1 kernel, and it has 192GB of ram > [] free -b > total used free shared buff/cache available > Mem: 201402642432 14413479936 75642777600 48586752 111346384896 185689632768 > Swap: 21474832384 31961088

Hi, I've been handed the administration of our Solaris 2.5.1 Server and have recently upgraded to Samba 2.0.5a. As the server is in a predominantly NTsp3 environment it was requested that when the NT passwords change (each month) the Unix Passwords should also change. All the NT and Win95 Clients are currently authenticating using Plain Text Passwords. Also the current security level is

Eli Lilly and company is one of the world's leading research-based pharmaceutical companies, and Lilly UK is one of the "Sunday Times Top 100 Best Companies To Work For". Due to growth, a new opportunity has arisen for an experienced Statistician with excellent communication skills to join our European team providing expertise and training in statistics to support pharmaceutical

Eli Lilly and company is one of the world's leading research-based pharmaceutical companies, and Lilly UK is one of the "Sunday Times Top 100 Best Companies To Work For". Due to growth, a new opportunity has arisen for an experienced Statistician with excellent communication skills to join our European team providing expertise and training in statistics to support pharmaceutical

Hello, I'm trying to figure why I have inconsistent results with my fts-solr powered search: My test is to find the string "am5oocobey9hait5Wiex8yohgoob9thu" in the 3 emails containing it that I sent to myself: - Directly on the server: doveadm search -u username text am5oocobey9hait5Wiex8yohgoob9thu e2c58a3093235153110800003ea484a8 7937 e2c58a3093235153110800003ea484a8 7938

A new kernel for Centos 7.4.1708 was released several days ago, version 3.10.0-693.17.1. Will there be a matching CentOS Plus kernel? Thanks for all the effort in providing that. Also, is there an announce list for Plus updates? -- I yam Popeye of the Borg. Prepares ta beez askimiligrated. Albert McCann albert.mccann at outlook.com

Hi, I am a developer who worked on CentOS. Recently I am working on porting one of my block drivers from CentOS 6.x to CentOS 7.x. In newest kernel (kernel-3.10.0-693.17.1.el7) I found there is an issue in submit_bio()'s first argument: void submit_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio) The type of bi_rw of struct bio is unsigned long, and the number of enum rq_flags_bits also exceeds 32, so we

On 2020-05-05 19:55, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 05.05.2020 um 13:25 schrieb Kishore Potnuru: >> # OS: Linux 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux >> Server release 7.4 (Maipo) xfs > > Hell, update your system! enterprise > [root at ocp ~]# uname -a > Linux ocp.sys5.org 3.10.0-1127.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 31 23:36:51 > UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64

PXELinux from a DHCP server - read the docs - couldnt be simpler. I'm afraid its beaten me, no matter what I do I always get the same result at the client side "PXE-E53: No boot file found" For the life of me I cannot see what I'm doing wrong and would appreciate any assistance in trying to diag. RedHat 7.3 - (I know its old but I have to accomodate other dependancies) dhcp

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I have been trying to hook our station up to the Public listing Directory at http://dir.xiph.org/index.php, I am just not sure how to do this. Can someone share with me? Mit freundlichen Gr??en Scott Winterstein EMAIL: 0turn1 at gmail.com PHONE: +49 0151 279 11519 Calls from USA +49 151 279 11519 WEBSITE: http://www.scottsdesk.net FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/scottsdesk DEVELOPMENT: