similar to: CESA-2017:2907 Important CentOS 7 wpa_supplicant Security Update

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "CESA-2017:2907 Important CentOS 7 wpa_supplicant Security Update"

2017 Oct 18
2
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:2907 Important CentOS 7 wpa_supplicant Security Update
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:2907 Important > > Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2907 Will there also be an update for CentOS 6? Or does the problem not exist with CentOS 6? -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan at storm.ca>
2017 Oct 18
1
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:2907 Important CentOS 7 wpa_supplicant Security Update
On 18/10/17 17:24, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:2907 Important >> >> Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2907 > > Will there also be an update for CentOS 6? Or does the problem not > exist with CentOS 6? > Yes, there is an update for
2017 Oct 18
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 152, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2017 Oct 18
0
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:2907 Important CentOS 7 wpa_supplicant Security Update
On 10/18/2017 11:28 AM, Phil Perry wrote: > On 18/10/17 17:24, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: >> Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> >>> ? CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:2907 Important >>> >>> ? Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2907 >> >> Will there also be an update for CentOS 6? Or does the
2017 Oct 18
0
CESA-2017:2911 Important CentOS 6 wpa_supplicant Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:2911 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2911 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1c4e471af89b650f2dd8b47db7a09af8a04368b0ed6532125ca37a7e55220193 wpa_supplicant-0.7.3-9.el6_9.2.i686.rpm x86_64:
2018 Feb 15
5
Install CentOS 7 on MBR hard disk
I have a UEFI system, but I want to install CentOS on a MBR (not GPT) hard disk. The installation program keeps telling me that I must create an "EFI system partition on a GPT disk mounted at /boot/efi". I can't find a way to work around this. Is there a solution? -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan at storm.ca>
2017 Sep 16
9
KeePassX replacement
I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I also sync the database between several machines, including Android units where I use keepass2android. Database compatibility is thus required. KeePassX, however, does not seem to be maintained any
2017 Jun 30
3
AMD Ryzen and CentOS
James A. Peltier <jpeltier at sfu.ca> wrote: > While I can't assure you that upgrading to 7 will fix the problem, > the likeliness that will work is at least 50% better being as 7 is > based on a newer kernel. I've installed CentOS 7 with the latest kernel from elrepo (4.11.8), and I can't get Grub to install. I think I'll have to conclude that it really
2017 Jun 29
3
AMD Ryzen and CentOS
I have a new system with an AMD Ryzen 1600 CPU and I'm trying to run CentOS, so far without success. The only information I could find was a post reporting that CentOS 7 would crash during installation on a Ryzen system: https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=61831 . I tried updating to the latest elrepo "mainline stable" kernel, version 4.11 (by booting from a live CD and
2009 Oct 15
3
CentOS 5.4 and BitTorrent
If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the release. Could the same be done this time? -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan at storm.ca> "Yves Bellefeuille: Eterna malvenkanto en UEA" -- Heroldo Komunikas, n-ro 389
2009 Dec 19
2
Donation programme
Is there any decision about the donation programme? The Web page still says: "If you are looking to make a cash dontation to the CentOS Project, please check back here after August 15th, 2009." I assume that donations aren't refused, but is there a suggested amount, as there used to be? -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan at storm.ca> "Yves Bellefeuille: Eterna malvenkanto en
2017 Dec 17
3
Strange dots on monitor
Yves thank you very much for your help, today I tried newer drivers but the problem persists. So I think it is hardware problem. Since the laptop is still in warranty I will probably contact the manufacturer. My only worry is that they would not accept it since I am running Linux (the laptop came with Windows - and I am not sure if the problem would be also present on Windows). Do you think there
2017 Nov 02
3
modestly priced laptop for C7
Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > And you are talking about 8 years old system on what would be called > decent hardware about the same 8 years back, right? The hardware is 6 years old and, at the time, Tech Report called it "the best netbook we've ever tested". So it was quite good (for a netbook) at the time. Everything depends on the OP's
2018 Feb 15
3
Install CentOS 7 on MBR hard disk
Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > I am guessing because my drives were blank and smaller than 2 TB that > it defaulted to MBR even when the system had a UEFI BIOS (as long as > the firmware is in legacy mode). Right, the problem seems to arise if you already have partitions on your MBR disk. Perhaps Fred Smith can confirm this. > What is the partition table
2020 Feb 22
2
Installing a single rpm package from desktop/browser on CentOS 7
Unfortunately, the GUI isn't quite set up to tell you what the error would be. When you use `$ sudo yum install whatever.rpm`, the output in the shell will often give you a clue as to what's going wrong--a missing dependency, etc. -- Seth. On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:51 AM Yves Bellefeuille <yan at storm.ca> wrote: > Toralf Lund <toralf.lund at pgs.com> wrote: > >
2017 Nov 02
4
modestly priced laptop for C7
Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > Not intending to contradict (if that ends up as pain, it will be > your pain anyway ;-) but I would go higher with specs if you intend > to use Linux on it. Linux tends to grow its demands for resources > pretty much exponentially (same as Windows does, only from lower > starting point). On my Acer Aspire One 522
2020 Feb 21
3
Installing a single rpm package from desktop/browser on CentOS 7
If I want to install a software package from a simple rpm file "the GUI way" on a CentOS 7 system, what am I supposed to do? If I open the file in the desktop, or alternatively, click on a link to a package in the browser and tell it to use the default app, gnome-software (I think) opens, but it just displays the message Sorry, something went wrong I mean, really? Isn't this
2020 Oct 21
2
Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?
Am 21.10.20 um 01:00 schrieb Robert Heller: > At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:07:27 -0600 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:45:54 -0400 (EDT) >> Robert Heller wrote: >> >>> Does FF 78 sound work properly in CentOS 7 and 8? >> >> firefox-78.2.0-2.el8_2.x86_64 >> >> Working fine for me here on
2018 Feb 15
2
Install CentOS 7 on MBR hard disk
Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > OK I am going with documentation not being right and/or I have been > very lucky with my installs. If you read https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/installation_guide/sect-disk-partitioning-setup-x86#sect-bootloader-mbr-gpt-x86 carefully, it seems to say that if you have UEFI and an MBR
2017 Sep 18
4
KeePassX replacement
On Sat, September 16, 2017 1:45 pm, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > >> I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for >> some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use >> KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I >> also sync the database between several machines,