similar to: New upstream URLs for CentOS update announcements

Hi, On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 13:25 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > We are changing the URLs for new CentOS updates from the current link > types (example): > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1679.html > > to these type of links instead (example): > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1679 First updates after this announcement did use the new url format,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0981 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0981.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6670fd76600628c298957fa17afe6ee9e511c5450e4d84152c57f644a60e8c24 xulrunner-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0981 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0981.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6670fd76600628c298957fa17afe6ee9e511c5450e4d84152c57f644a60e8c24 xulrunner-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm

Hello listmates, I have encountered a rather peculiar situation. We have a Centos 6 VM (64 bit) running on a VMware vSphere 5.5 server. It was running just fine until one day I decided to reboot it and it just would not boot up. Effectively, dracut failed to initialize the LVM, much like under the scenario described here:

Hi, I woke up Saturday morning unable to boot my freshly upgraded 5.6 with grub hanging at "GRUB". After getting the boot loader fixed I experienced crashes in evolution. Downgrading glibc to 2.5-58 seems to fix these issues. Anyone else seeing this? Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Hi, Just noticed that the distro tag used in openssl is different from upstream. Upstream and the last update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7) use "el6_6" where as the latest update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6.8) uses "el_6". Any reason for this discrepancy? Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Hi, I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production environment for more than six months without any problem. I am wondering if/when we are going to see a 5.2.14 version there and if the recently disclosure of a 5.1.6 security update affects the 5.2.10 that is in testing. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi. http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2347 There is updated packages for Debian (and Ubuntu) already. Do you know how long until Centos release an update to bind ? I have looked here and couldn't see any info - http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-November/thread.html - Is this the correct place to look for security update info ? Cheers !

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 04:38:39PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > The qemu-kvm option "-enable-nesting" that I dug up in the source looks > promising. No mention in the man page on either C6 or C7 but it is > mentioned here: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-October/msg01138.html > > How do I pass the "-enable-nesting" option to

Hi, Updating selinux-policy-targeted to 3.7.19-260 fails. The archive seems corrupt. Got another copy from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/ which also fails: # rpm -Fv selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-260.el6.noarch.rpm Preparing packages for installation... selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-260.el6 warning: /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/customizable_types saved as

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0392 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0392.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 426b0df04652f9936e703dc74a62cdc6b88ddd6e79fe705fcfabbc93469384f7 polkit-0.112-11.el7_3.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0392 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0392.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 426b0df04652f9936e703dc74a62cdc6b88ddd6e79fe705fcfabbc93469384f7 polkit-0.112-11.el7_3.i686.rpm

Hello, I am working on a CentOS Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 system. I noticed that the system came with httpd-2.2.15-6 installed. After I run 'yum update' I get httpd-2.2.15-9. I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following information: are most of the security fixes that appear in httpd-2.2.21 applied to the update on httpd-2.2.15-9? There was a security fix just

Hello John, On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 16:33 +0000, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > > How about my request for checksums in the git repo? > > What checksums would you actually want in git? SRPMS are signed which allows the integrity of the contents to be checked. Such an integrity check is missing from the git repo. Either a checksum

Hi, I tried to apply a security context on a directory with the following commands: [root@ local]# semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t "netdot(/.*)?" [root@ local]# restorecon -R netdot/ When I list the contexts, it is part of the list.... [root@ local]# semanage fcontext -l | grep netdot ./netdot(/.*)? all files

Hello team, Just wondering how the build of 5.10 is coming along. Is there a resource that informs us on these matters? Thanks! Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Hello, Received an update for qemu-kvm and qemu-img today, but the corresponding announcement is missing. Haven't received any messages since August 3rd, so there might be other announcements that haven't made it to the list yet. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

On 10/19/2016 11:34 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Gordon, > *snip* > > Personally I would be more concerned whether or not to enable ECDSA > algorithms (https://blog.cr.yp.to/20140323-ecdsa.html). > > Regards, > Leonard. > For web server ECDSA certs is currently a concern because the only curves with popular support across browsers have parameters that were

Hi, Received lvm2 updates for CEBA-2015-1018 but haven't seen an announcement on CentOS announce yet nor can I find it in the archives. Is it still in the pipeline or did something go wrong? Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research