Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "CEBA-2016:0218 CentOS 7 ipxe BugFix Update"
2015 Aug 26
2
Virtio serial exposition
Hi,
I try to exchange datas between host and Guest by adding these lines in a guest .xml conf file :
<channel type='pty'>
<target type='virtio' name='arbitrary.virtio.serial.port.name'/>
<address type='virtio-serial' controller='0' bus='0' port='1'/>
</channel>
Then
2015 Aug 27
0
Re: Virtio serial exposition
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:17:20PM +0000, Jean-Pierre Ribeauville wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to exchange datas between host and Guest by adding these lines in a guest .xml conf file :
>
> <channel type='pty'>
> <target type='virtio' name='arbitrary.virtio.serial.port.name'/>
> <address type='virtio-serial'
2016 Jan 20
0
channel device "state" value missing within OpenStack Kilo version
Hi,
I've installed a OpenStack KILO all-in-one .
For private need , I've to add a channel device to all my GUESTS on my compute node.
It works fine (e.g. via a virsh command).
Problem is that , in the xml describing the Guest , this 'state' value :
<target type='virtio' name='agent' state='disconnected'/>
showing if the channel is connected
2015 Jan 12
0
Libvirt save problem
Hi list,
i use a centos 7 as virtual host with two guests with windows 2012 standard
( as storage i use RAW files).
My problem is that sometime during the bakup my server reboot without
leaving information in the log files ( /var/log/messages ).
The backup does this steps:
1) Save the state of the virtual guest ( with the command "virsh save " )
2) Make a snapshot of the filesystem (
2016 Jan 20
0
Re: channel device "state" value missing within OpenStack Kilo version
Hi,
Discard this request , I was investigating on the wrong compute node.
It works fine.
Sorry for incovenience.
Regards,
J.P.
De : Jean-Pierre Ribeauville
Envoyé : mercredi 20 janvier 2016 16:18
À : 'libvirt-users@redhat.com'
Objet : channel device "state" value missing within OpenStack Kilo version
Hi,
I've installed a OpenStack KILO all-in-one .
For private
2016 Feb 22
0
About the vfio error when using SR-IOV
Hi, All
I want to use the SR-IOV of intel 82576 NIC.
I enabled IOMMU and VT-d and SR-IOV in BIOS.
And enabled VT-d in kernel.
The OS information is bellow:
[root@host3 nova]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core)
[root@host3 nova]# uname -an
Linux host3.localdomain 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 6 11:36:42 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@host3 nova]#
2014 Dec 28
0
CentOS 7 KVM guests no longer get keystrokes after yum update
Dear all,
After "yum update" and reboot on a CentOS 7 server running kvm,
all VM guests fail to receive keyboard input. Even sending
ctrl-alt-delete from the virt-manager "Send Key" menu is
inoperative. Most guests are set up as spice + QXL, and viewed
on remote X sessions using virt-manager. Extensive browsing for a
solution has turned up only dead ends. I tried reverting to
2015 Jul 31
0
EFI: ipxe + syslinux = Failed to read blocks: 0xC
Hello,
I can't help with the problems on real hardware but have come across the
qemu problems before and maybe I can give some hints on that.
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, Oscar Roozen via Syslinux wrote:
> So it was time for the next step. Migrate this setup to our automated testing
> environment that runs under qemu-kvm. For this I had to use OVMF so the nodes
> would boot in EFI mode
2015 Aug 03
1
EFI: ipxe + syslinux = Failed to read blocks: 0xC
> I can't help with the problems on real hardware but have come across the
> qemu problems before and maybe I can give some hints on that.
Thank you, your help is much appreciated!
>> The short story is that I never got further than syslinux proclaiming
>> "Failed to read blocks: 0xC" before even getting to the stage where it
>> tries to load ldlinux.e64.
2014 Jul 02
0
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On Jul 1, 2014 10:37 PM, "Alexander Perlis" <aperlis at math.lsu.edu> wrote:
>
> I believe I'm seeing a bug in lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 but I need some
advice on how to isolate and troubleshoot this. (I can't try pre18 at the
moment, but did try 4.07 and 5.10 and saw similar behavior, also with
pxelinux.0, so although I'll give pre18 a try soon, some
2015 Aug 26
0
Re: On which /dev/pts/x is channel source
Hi,
I just tested by using "unix virtio" channel instead of pty.
It looks easier to handle.
Thx for help.
Regards,
J.P.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : libvirt-users-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-users-bounces@redhat.com] De la part de libvirt-users-request@redhat.com
Envoyé : mercredi 26 août 2015 15:38
À : libvirt-users@redhat.com
Objet : libvirt-users Digest, Vol 68,
2015 Jul 31
0
EFI: ipxe + syslinux = Failed to read blocks: 0xC
>>>
Using VMware I built a test setup of a server with dhcp, tftp and a
http-server and several pxe-clients with EFI mode turned on. This setup
worked, albeit with the exponential-like decay of IO rate I described
earlier. The work-around of using HTTP works beautifully though.
<<<
""exponential-like decay of IO rate"" could you please post a link on
2014 Apr 02
3
Xen4CentOS: Unnecessary gpxe / ipxe obsoletes
I installed CentOS6 with the xen4centos set of packages; then I tried
to install KVM (for performance comparison), I got the following error
in YUM:
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/share/gpxe/e1000-0x100e.rom for
package: 2:qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.4.x86_64
Package gpxe-roms-qemu is obsoleted by ipxe-roms-qemu, but obsoleting
package does not provide for requirements
I manually
2014 Jul 02
1
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
Op 2014-07-01 om 22:55 schreef Gene Cumm:
> On Jul 1, 2014 10:37 PM, "Alexander Perlis" wrote:
> >
> > I believe I'm seeing a bug in lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 but I need some
> > advice on how to isolate and troubleshoot this. (I can't try pre18
> > at the moment, but did try 4.07 and 5.10 and saw similar behavior,
> > also with pxelinux.0, so
2014 Jul 02
3
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
I believe I'm seeing a bug in lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 but I need some
advice on how to isolate and troubleshoot this. (I can't try pre18 at
the moment, but did try 4.07 and 5.10 and saw similar behavior, also
with pxelinux.0, so although I'll give pre18 a try soon, some
isolation/troubleshooting advice will be a good education no matter what.)
To get to our PXE-launched tools from
2013 Oct 18
1
[ipxe-devel] Remove gpxe or replace with ipxe?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brown <mbrown at fensystems.co.uk> wrote:
> On 09/10/13 10:45, Robin Smidsr?d wrote:
>>
>> On 09.10.2013 02:56, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>
>>> The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either
>>> replace it with iPXE or just drop it, giving people a recipe for how to
>>> integrate
2013 Oct 09
0
[ipxe-devel] Remove gpxe or replace with ipxe?
> The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either
> replace it with iPXE or just drop it, giving people a recipe for how to
> integrate with iPXE themselves.
>
> What do people think?
My vote is replace with iPXE. I've manually replaced gPXE with iPXE for years, works like charm.
I suggest updating the Makefile to use undionly.kkkpxe because of the change
2014 Mar 17
0
Fwd: [ipxe-devel] iPXE boot from both ports (from diferent subnets) not working
From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [ipxe-devel] iPXE boot from both ports (from diferent
subnets) not working
To: Wissam Shoukair <wissams at mellanox.com>
Cc: "ipxe-devel at lists.ipxe.org" <ipxe-devel at lists.ipxe.org>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Wissam Shoukair <wissams at mellanox.com> wrote:
>
2015 Dec 14
0
CESA-2015:2619 Moderate CentOS 7 libreoffice Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:2619 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2619.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
f4cd30964bac5a16549d01ddbbe62fa95463e51e11de3eeeddddea171dff989a autocorr-af-4.3.7.2-5.el7_2.1.noarch.rpm
2015 Oct 25
0
Confusion on lpxelinux vs. gpxelinux vs. ipxe vs gpxe.
On 25/10/15 01:04, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux
> <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
>
>> Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115
>
> A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some
> understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further
> development as of a