Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "CESA-2015:1081 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update"
2015 Jun 11
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 124, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2016 Feb 03
2
Kernel Panic post kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Warren Young wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Max Pyziur <pyz at brama.com> wrote:
>>
>> When I tried rebooting the machine, none of the kernels would work except for the oldest one.
>
> Define ?would not work?. Post a photo of the error message somewhere if you can?t describe it better than that. You might have to turn off rhgb mode to get a
2016 Feb 03
2
Kernel Panic post kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
Greetings,
Today, I decided to reboot one of my CentOS machines after it had been
running for 219 days.
In this time, I had done yum updates several times. When I tried rebooting
the machine, none of the kernels would work except for the oldest one.
Here are the installed kernels:
kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
kernel-2.6.32-573.3.1.el6.x86_64
kernel-2.6.32-573.7.1.el6.x86_64
2016 Feb 03
0
Kernel Panic post kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Max Pyziur <pyz at brama.com> wrote:
>
> When I tried rebooting the machine, none of the kernels would work except for the oldest one.
Define ?would not work?. Post a photo of the error message somewhere if you can?t describe it better than that. You might have to turn off rhgb mode to get a useful error message.
> Here are the installed kernels:
2015 Aug 13
0
how do I stop automount of Hitichi Lifestudio USB drive
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 5:22 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> autofs is what's mounting it. But if you turn it off, you'll have to
>> manually mount anything that's not in /etc/fstab.
>>
>> Sounds like gnome's trying to be WinDoze....
>
> Its not ?autofs? specifically (which is a simple thing) but udev
2015 Aug 02
2
[SOLVED] kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic
>> Rebooted my home server into a new kernel and got a hard system lockup
>> and a bunch of "kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic" in
>> /var/log/messages. The culprits seem to be nvidia-352.30 drivers from
>> elrepo. Downgrading to 352.21 solved the problem.
>
> which centos version?
>
> which kernel?
>
> which nvidia card?
>
> what is
2015 Jul 01
2
nfs problems lately ?
On 07/01/2015 11:51 AM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:36:36AM +0300, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>> Hi! Did anyone encountered problems with nfs after the latest updates?
>> I started to have problems like nfsvers=3 no longer working in fstab
>> or messages like :
>> RPC: Program not registered
> at work, our diskless warewulf setup is still working fine
2015 Jun 09
1
Why is sha256-generic preferred over sha256-ssse3?
The newly-released kernel v2.6.32-504.23.4.el6 includes the back-ported SHA256-SSSE3 driver.
Why is the generic version of the SHA256 driver selected at runtime instead of the SSSE3 version on this x86_64 system?
Yes, my CPU does support the SSSE3 instruction set, and the use of SHA256 is invoked by the LUKS "cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256" option.
On the running system I see that the
2015 Jun 19
0
using rsync to sync desktop /home/user of to laptop /home/user
Hi G, :D
----- "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net> escreveu:
> De: "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net>
> Para: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 18 de Junho de 2015 10:44:56 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected
> Assunto: Re: [CentOS] using rsync to sync desktop /home/user of to laptop /home/user
>
> On 06/17/2015
2015 Jul 01
0
nfs problems lately ?
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:36:36AM +0300, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! Did anyone encountered problems with nfs after the latest updates?
> I started to have problems like nfsvers=3 no longer working in fstab
> or messages like :
> RPC: Program not registered
at work, our diskless warewulf setup is still working fine here
NFS client running 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
Cheers
Tru
--
2015 Jul 01
0
nfs problems lately ?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Adrian Sevcenco <Adrian.Sevcenco at cern.ch> wrote:
> On 07/01/2015 11:51 AM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:36:36AM +0300, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi! Did anyone encountered problems with nfs after the latest updates?
>>> I started to have problems like nfsvers=3 no longer working in fstab
2015 Aug 02
0
[SOLVED] kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:32 PM, ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su> wrote:
>>> Rebooted my home server into a new kernel and got a hard system lockup
>>> and a bunch of "kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic" in
>>> /var/log/messages. The culprits seem to be nvidia-352.30 drivers from
>>> elrepo. Downgrading to 352.21 solved the problem.
2015 Sep 01
0
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
On 01/09/15 15:33, Rafael Domiciano wrote:
> Hi Rowland, thanks for your response.
>
> Both samba is self compiled.
>
> DC 1:
> [root at wdc samba]# uname -a
> Linux wdc 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 9 20:57:37 UTC
> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> [root at wdc samba]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
>
> [root at wdc
2016 Feb 21
1
Kernel panic and crash, was Re: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2016:0150 CentOS 6 kernel BugFix Update
Greetings,
I just tried upgrading one of my CentOS boxes to this kernel.
It crashes; the screen looks like this:
http://www.brama.com/~deckard/P1010308.JPG
So, I'm continuing to run on
kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
I had previously reported this, and I was told that the reported bug was
here:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9374
Looking at it now, I see that it is closed.
2015 Sep 01
2
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
Hi Rowland, thanks for your response.
Both samba is self compiled .
DC 1:
[root at wdc samba]# uname -a
Linux wdc 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 9 20:57:37 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root at wdc samba]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
[root at wdc samba]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
search DOMAIN
nameserver 172.16.5.22
nameserver 172.16.5.1
2015 Sep 02
0
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
The same problem ocurred today. The same log in /var/log/messages in DC, and I have to stop and start the samba service. Any help is appreciate.
Regards,
Rafael
----- Mensagem original -----
De: "Rafael Domiciano" <r.domiciano at senff.com.br>
Para: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de
2015 Sep 01
2
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
----- Mensagem original -----
De: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>
Para: samba at lists.samba.org
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de Setembro de 2015 12:05:20
Assunto: Re: [Samba] Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
On 01/09/15 15:33, Rafael Domiciano wrote:
> Hi Rowland, thanks for your response.
>
> Both samba is self compiled.
>
2015 Sep 02
0
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
Thanks Rowland for response.
OK, setup the "log level = 10".
I noticed something today. I have to restart the samba server 2 times. In the second restart I did a named restart too. Maybe could be something related to communication to named?
I did the named.conf conforming the wiki, adding these 2 lines:
options {
....
# DNS dynamic updates via kerberos
tkey-gssapi-keytab
2015 Sep 02
2
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
On 02/09/15 13:34, Rafael Domiciano wrote:
> The same problem ocurred today. The same log in /var/log/messages in
> DC, and I have to stop and start the samba service. Any help is
> appreciate.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rafael
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *De: *"Rafael Domiciano" <r.domiciano at
2005 Sep 07
1
[Bug 1081] AIX port does not support group allow/ deny via nss_ldap
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1081
Summary: AIX port does not support group allow/ deny via nss_ldap
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 3.9p1
Platform: PPC
OS/Version: AIX
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org