similar to: CESA-2015:1081 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "CESA-2015:1081 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update"

2015 Jun 11
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 124, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2016 Feb 03
2
Kernel Panic post kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Warren Young wrote: > On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Max Pyziur <pyz at brama.com> wrote: >> >> When I tried rebooting the machine, none of the kernels would work except for the oldest one. > > Define ?would not work?. Post a photo of the error message somewhere if you can?t describe it better than that. You might have to turn off rhgb mode to get a
2016 Feb 03
2
Kernel Panic post kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
Greetings, Today, I decided to reboot one of my CentOS machines after it had been running for 219 days. In this time, I had done yum updates several times. When I tried rebooting the machine, none of the kernels would work except for the oldest one. Here are the installed kernels: kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 kernel-2.6.32-573.3.1.el6.x86_64 kernel-2.6.32-573.7.1.el6.x86_64
2016 Feb 03
0
Kernel Panic post kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Max Pyziur <pyz at brama.com> wrote: > > When I tried rebooting the machine, none of the kernels would work except for the oldest one. Define ?would not work?. Post a photo of the error message somewhere if you can?t describe it better than that. You might have to turn off rhgb mode to get a useful error message. > Here are the installed kernels:
2015 Aug 13
0
how do I stop automount of Hitichi Lifestudio USB drive
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 12, 2015, at 5:22 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> autofs is what's mounting it. But if you turn it off, you'll have to >> manually mount anything that's not in /etc/fstab. >> >> Sounds like gnome's trying to be WinDoze.... > > Its not ?autofs? specifically (which is a simple thing) but udev
2015 Aug 02
2
[SOLVED] kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic
>> Rebooted my home server into a new kernel and got a hard system lockup >> and a bunch of "kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic" in >> /var/log/messages. The culprits seem to be nvidia-352.30 drivers from >> elrepo. Downgrading to 352.21 solved the problem. > > which centos version? > > which kernel? > > which nvidia card? > > what is
2015 Jul 01
2
nfs problems lately ?
On 07/01/2015 11:51 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:36:36AM +0300, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: >> Hi! Did anyone encountered problems with nfs after the latest updates? >> I started to have problems like nfsvers=3 no longer working in fstab >> or messages like : >> RPC: Program not registered > at work, our diskless warewulf setup is still working fine
2015 Jun 09
1
Why is sha256-generic preferred over sha256-ssse3?
The newly-released kernel v2.6.32-504.23.4.el6 includes the back-ported SHA256-SSSE3 driver. Why is the generic version of the SHA256 driver selected at runtime instead of the SSSE3 version on this x86_64 system? Yes, my CPU does support the SSSE3 instruction set, and the use of SHA256 is invoked by the LUKS "cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256" option. On the running system I see that the
2015 Jun 19
0
using rsync to sync desktop /home/user of to laptop /home/user
Hi G, :D ----- "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net> escreveu: > De: "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net> > Para: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 18 de Junho de 2015 10:44:56 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected > Assunto: Re: [CentOS] using rsync to sync desktop /home/user of to laptop /home/user > > On 06/17/2015
2015 Jul 01
0
nfs problems lately ?
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:36:36AM +0300, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > Hi! Did anyone encountered problems with nfs after the latest updates? > I started to have problems like nfsvers=3 no longer working in fstab > or messages like : > RPC: Program not registered at work, our diskless warewulf setup is still working fine here NFS client running 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 Cheers Tru --
2015 Jul 01
0
nfs problems lately ?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Adrian Sevcenco <Adrian.Sevcenco at cern.ch> wrote: > On 07/01/2015 11:51 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:36:36AM +0300, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: >>> >>> Hi! Did anyone encountered problems with nfs after the latest updates? >>> I started to have problems like nfsvers=3 no longer working in fstab
2015 Aug 02
0
[SOLVED] kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:32 PM, ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su> wrote: >>> Rebooted my home server into a new kernel and got a hard system lockup >>> and a bunch of "kernel: BUG: scheduling while atomic" in >>> /var/log/messages. The culprits seem to be nvidia-352.30 drivers from >>> elrepo. Downgrading to 352.21 solved the problem.
2015 Sep 01
0
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
On 01/09/15 15:33, Rafael Domiciano wrote: > Hi Rowland, thanks for your response. > > Both samba is self compiled. > > DC 1: > [root at wdc samba]# uname -a > Linux wdc 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 9 20:57:37 UTC > 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > [root at wdc samba]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 6.6 (Final) > > [root at wdc
2016 Feb 21
1
Kernel panic and crash, was Re: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2016:0150 CentOS 6 kernel BugFix Update
Greetings, I just tried upgrading one of my CentOS boxes to this kernel. It crashes; the screen looks like this: http://www.brama.com/~deckard/P1010308.JPG So, I'm continuing to run on kernel-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 I had previously reported this, and I was told that the reported bug was here: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9374 Looking at it now, I see that it is closed.
2015 Sep 01
2
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
Hi Rowland, thanks for your response. Both samba is self compiled . DC 1: [root at wdc samba]# uname -a Linux wdc 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 9 20:57:37 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root at wdc samba]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.6 (Final) [root at wdc samba]# cat /etc/resolv.conf search DOMAIN nameserver 172.16.5.22 nameserver 172.16.5.1
2015 Sep 02
0
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
The same problem ocurred today. The same log in /var/log/messages in DC, and I have to stop and start the samba service. Any help is appreciate. Regards, Rafael ----- Mensagem original ----- De: "Rafael Domiciano" <r.domiciano at senff.com.br> Para: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de
2015 Sep 01
2
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
----- Mensagem original ----- De: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> Para: samba at lists.samba.org Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de Setembro de 2015 12:05:20 Assunto: Re: [Samba] Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result On 01/09/15 15:33, Rafael Domiciano wrote: > Hi Rowland, thanks for your response. > > Both samba is self compiled. >
2015 Sep 02
0
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
Thanks Rowland for response. OK, setup the "log level = 10". I noticed something today. I have to restart the samba server 2 times. In the second restart I did a named restart too. Maybe could be something related to communication to named? I did the named.conf conforming the wiki, adding these 2 lines: options { .... # DNS dynamic updates via kerberos tkey-gssapi-keytab
2015 Sep 02
2
Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result
On 02/09/15 13:34, Rafael Domiciano wrote: > The same problem ocurred today. The same log in /var/log/messages in > DC, and I have to stop and start the samba service. Any help is > appreciate. > > Regards, > > Rafael > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *De: *"Rafael Domiciano" <r.domiciano at
2005 Sep 07
1
[Bug 1081] AIX port does not support group allow/ deny via nss_ldap
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1081 Summary: AIX port does not support group allow/ deny via nss_ldap Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org