similar to: CEBA-2015:1033 CentOS 6 glibc BugFix Update

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 110 matches similar to: "CEBA-2015:1033 CentOS 6 glibc BugFix Update"

2015 May 28
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 123, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2015 Jul 06
0
Can't install gmime22
Hello list, I'm trying to install gmime22 package which is one of the packages reported as required by ./contrib/scripts/install_prereq test. Whatever I do I'm getting to a dead end. On the regular yum repositories that I use (centos, epel, rpmforge, asterisk, digium) it is not found. I've found it on Fedora repositories however trying to use those I get all sorts of errors: On
2015 May 28
1
Openssl C6 distro tag different from upstream
Hello, On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 14:25 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 04/02/2015 11:45 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > Just noticed that the distro tag used in openssl is different from > > upstream. Upstream and the last update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7) use > > "el6_6" where as the latest update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6.8) uses > > "el_6". Any
2015 Apr 02
2
Openssl C6 distro tag different from upstream
Hi, Just noticed that the distro tag used in openssl is different from upstream. Upstream and the last update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7) use "el6_6" where as the latest update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6.8) uses "el_6". Any reason for this discrepancy? Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
2015 Jan 07
0
CESA-2015:0016 Moderate CentOS 6 glibc Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0016 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0016.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 24e8a54841d2f60b571da54c41c8b5e90713c920aa6b8d5fea15f4c59028393d glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.4.i686.rpm
2015 Jan 27
0
CESA-2015:0092 Critical CentOS 6 glibc Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0092 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0f0554770d7a565500adf20a0d403376de57f111118c04fed003266e2405598a glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.i686.rpm
2015 Apr 21
0
CESA-2015:0863 Moderate CentOS 6 glibc Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0863 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0863.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 88b30b9049a6e88898b2e3f43927137c710ecbd50c41f2bdbb41315219a3ff54 glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
2005 May 07
2
[Bug 1033] Fix compile-time warnings
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1033 Summary: Fix compile-time warnings Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dtucker at
2005 Oct 30
1
[Bug 1033] Fix compile-time warnings
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1033 ------- Comment #3 from djm at mindrot.org 2005-10-30 11:49 ------- Are these still relevant? Hasn't the PAM one been committed already? (leading to...) can we close this bug? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2003 Aug 12
0
RE: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #1033 - 7 msgs
Same thing. It will make sense to try Register => <FWDnum>@fwd.pulver.com:<FWDpass>@fwdnat.pulver.com:5082 but in that case Asterisk sends REGISTER sip:fwdnat.pulver.com SIP/2.0 which is not right. It should be sip:fwd.pulver.com but sent thru fwdnat.pulver.com:5082 BR Borut -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Using Asterisk with FWD through NAT From:
2011 Sep 22
0
CEBA-2011:1033 CentOS 5 i386 iscsi-initiator-utils Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1033 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1033.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 615f3d7741c85ddb841d0a69e0fe1370 iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.872-10.el5.i386.rpm Source: 341bd948d4ab8411aba94e233ee34169
2011 Sep 22
0
CEBA-2011:1033 CentOS 5 x86_64 iscsi-initiator-utils Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1033 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1033.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: a3f46dc9c8433197ebf876a428739989 iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.872-10.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 341bd948d4ab8411aba94e233ee34169
2016 May 13
0
CESA-2016:1033 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1033 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1033.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: e801eefac331bf94d82a086f54b9ebb7dd5af0c666744f96a751226639baabac kernel-3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
2001 Jul 26
2
winedt (PR#1033)
i don't know, whether this is a bug or it is intended: when using winedt and R together it works perfectly, as long as R is run in mdi (multiple window mode). When you switch to sdi (single window mode) winedt, sends no command at all: no history, paste, source or script. Thomas Pesl > version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch x86 os Win32
2015 Apr 22
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 122, Issue 11
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2015 Jan 08
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 119, Issue 2
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2015 Jan 28
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 119, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2007 May 28
0
[1033] trunk/wxruby2/swig: GC fixes for nested sizers; fix crashes in html.rb demo
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!-- #msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Packages are being built for CentOS 5, 6 & 7 at the moment: https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560128242682966017 & https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560138182441070592 On 27 January 2015 at 20:22, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: > > On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: > >> >
2015 Jan 27
4
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: >> >> Saw this on the Exim List:- >> > <SNIP> >> >> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ? >> > > upstream references: > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html When I read this I read that it is fixed in