similar to: CESA-2015:0794 Moderate CentOS 6 krb5 Security Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I have three users whose smbd processes will suddenly go rogue and start sucking up CPU time. It isn't guaranteed that every time they log in, that their process goes rogue, but it happens a lot. At that time I see that those smbd processes have an effective UID of the person's username, and a real UID of root. Everyone else's is always EUID root and UID root. I haven't a clue

An old problem has started to reappear with our Solaris (2.8) Samba (3.0.23b). This was after an upgrade from 3.0.22 in which the problem was worse. Occasionally an smbd process will go "rogue" and start consuming CPU cycles until killed. I did a truss of the process and got back this tight loop. fcntl(27, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBEEF98) = 0 fcntl(27, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBEF010)

This is a follow-on to my previous message about some 3.0.23b Solaris smbd processes going rogue and eating CPU time. One characteristic of the processes are that the effective UID of the process is the user's UID, rather than root's which is what a see for the well behaved processes. Any ideas how that could be happening so that I can get closer to a solution? Thanks. -- Jonathan M.

Hi, I have three Xen hosts running Xen 4.0.2 (OpenSuSE 11.4 based). I also have one ''NFS'' server with an NFS export holding VM images and configuration files. Each host has a dedicated LAN link directly to the NFS server. I have another separated NFS export for VM locking (but I had the same issues before). When I attempt to live migrate a VM, it *looks''*like

Google hasn't been a whole lot of help here, so here goes... Using the -r switch appears to impose a significant performance hit on low[er] end (embedded) systems, i.e. those without scads of memory, and/or multi-core workstation or server class machines. If you DON'T specify the -r switch, surely rsync won't ignore directory trees - or will it? Warm regards & TIA -C

Is there a way to know from the rsync logs how long it took to do a backup? The only timing info,. I see is this at the end: sent 3067328 bytes received 7853035429 bytes 1187888.83 bytes/sec total size is 1559866450336 speedup is 198.55 Can I use it to figure out how long the operation took? Does the above mean it took 2.5 secs of send time and 1.8 hours of recieve time so (roughly) the