similar to: CESA-2015:0102 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0102 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0102.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 5953bcabb2801ceddffe79684dbef64022546b17d1cebb24a2151e0b2778a04a kernel-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this: > > Generating grub configuration file ... > Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 > Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img > Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 > Found initrd

> > Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this: > Generating grub configuration file ... > Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 > Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img > Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 > Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64.img > Found linux image:

On 03/02/2015 02:06 AM, Fred Smith wrote: > Hi all! > > I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and > also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). The Fedora installer > had found the windows installation and it appeared in the grub menu, > and was bootable and worked fine. > > The C7 installer did not put the windows installation

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 09:26:59PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Fred Smith > <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > > Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this: > > > > Generating grub configuration file ... > > Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 > > Found initrd image:

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 09:41:06PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this: > > Generating grub configuration file ... > > Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 > > Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img > > Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 > > Found

Hi all! I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). The Fedora installer had found the windows installation and it appeared in the grub menu, and was bootable and worked fine. The C7 installer did not put the windows installation into the grub menu. with some googling I found a page at

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Sunday, March 01, 2015 20:06:26 -0500 > From: Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot > > Hi all! > > I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 > (and also Fedora 19, which the C7 is

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Sunday, March 01, 2015 21:50:34 -0500 > From: Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 02:04:24AM +0000, Richard wrote: >> >> >> ------------ Original Message ------------

On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:33:59PM +0100, M?rio Barbosa wrote: > On 03/02/2015 02:06 AM, Fred Smith wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and > > also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). The Fedora installer > > had found the windows installation and it appeared in the grub menu, > > and

Am 12.02.2015 um 15:47 schrieb Martin ?tefany: > Hello, > > I've ran into problem with Dovecot and dsync replication. Everything > works perfectly, including replication of sieve scripts, except fact > that if user activates the 'managesieve' ruleset (I'm using currently > Roundcubemail) on "mail1" host, it wouldn't be activated on

# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) # uname -r 3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 Hi, We use iSCSI over a 10G Ethernet Adapter and SRP over an Infiniband adapter to provide multipathing to our storage: # lspci | grep 10-Gigabit 81:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01) 81:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation

Hi. Anyone can help me? I have Linux 3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 # cat /etc/os-release NAME="CentOS Linux" VERSION="7 (Core)" ID="centos" ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="7" PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" I added new virtual interfaces (br71 and vlan71) via NetworkManager # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br71 DEVICE=br71

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 03/06/16 04:45, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 31, 2016, 7:59 PM Albert McCann <albert.mccann at outlook.com> >> wrote: >> >>> In CentOS 7.2.1511 does the 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 (Plus) >>> kernel read HFSPlus iMac drives? I

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Chris Murphy > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 5:01 PM > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] HFSPlus Question > > Fedora 24 > [root at f24m mnt]# grep HFSPLUS /boot/config-4.5.6-300.fc24.x86_64 >

I just started a heavy load imap service and everything fitted OK in functional terms. The problem comes whith stress tests, I have no problem in the directors line. But my doubt comes whether the backends are using efficiently the resources assigned or not. The main goal is to maximize the concurrency without affect the integrity of operations. My question is: Is there a rule for

Hi. Sorry. Today I have a big problem with the samba I can not solve! My permissions do not work properly. in the RSAT created groups, OU and users. I configured in Windows the shared directory *TECNOLOGIA* security settings assigning full permissions to *grupo_tecnologia* (technology group). However users who are with *grupo_tecnologia* (primary) to access the share opens a popup asking for

Hello, I've ran into problem with Dovecot and dsync replication. Everything works perfectly, including replication of sieve scripts, except fact that if user activates the 'managesieve' ruleset (I'm using currently Roundcubemail) on "mail1" host, it wouldn't be activated on "mail2" host, by creating symlink ".dovecot.sieve ->

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:0102 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0102 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 52354f1c21e0e31c07b0485cacaa596a45ac785e3864a4ab459ab492583b25ed bind-9.9.4-51.el7_4.2.x86_64.rpm