similar to: CESA-2014:1984 Important CentOS 5 bind Security Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1515 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1515.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 70be08407007ee373075a7f4c0e8f30f9ae9486cc6e86d758e145c7e0452fbba bind97-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.2.i386.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1099 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1099.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b874bb191341b1943146a7535fa2f6785d7db275e210602aec73024612f6f625 nss_ldap-253-52.el5_11.2.i386.rpm x86_64:

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1984 Bug #: 1984 Summary: Add Unix Domain Socket Forwarding Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1984 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Close all resolved bugs after 7.3p1 release

On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to > be forced to ignore or deal with this crap. > > Anybody else seeing it? > > In case attachments aren't allowed in the list, here's the Dropbox url > for the image. > >

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:30:03PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, January 22, 2015 9:05 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > > >> I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to > >> be forced to ignore or deal with this crap. > >> > >> >

On Thu, January 22, 2015 22:23, Always Learning wrote: > > > Surely Linux users change to Root to do system work, rather than > attempt to make Root changes in the middle of doing ordinary GUI > tasks whilst logged-in as a normal user ? > I logon with my normal user id and run a development desktop. Then I open terminal sessions and su -l into root as I need to. However, if

On Fri, January 23, 2015 06:50, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > I don't want this stupid thing popping up every time I switch from my > normal active user logons to my "dead" one (used to get around the > unaddressed bug I filed over a month ago about switching run levels > causing crashes and running multiple users as I'd been doing for ... > over a decade(?) on

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:30:03PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Just out of curiosity: how do you guys look at it? This asks me for > password... In general it is good idea to place something into open URL I think that's what he wanted you to look at. It's a screenshot of a window asking you to enter a password. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~

On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > As a matter of fact I tend to not use GUI admin tools since long ago. Bring back Xconfigurator! > I do prefer 3ware web RAID admin > interface anything else (it more transparently prevents me from making > fatal blunders - probably just me). No, not just you. tw_cli is needlessly confusing

On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 13:32 -0800, Keith Keller wrote: > <snip> > But (getting back a little to the original topic) getting to the 3ware > web interface should not require root privileges on the client, since > it's just the browser connecting to the 3ware http(s) listener. The OP > seemed to be ranting about a prompt for an administrative password from > the desktop

On 2015-01-23, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > > Actually, my rant was much more about it interrupting me, without being > asked, to do some updates that I didn't yet request *and* being > persistent about it over time in *my* (not Freedesktop.org's) work > space. Perhaps if you'd specified that in your original post there would have been a

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1984 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1984.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: dec983c747ba78c1f5273d05b60aab725325ac891a76d8309b2f2af821adcdd4 bind-9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.1.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1984 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1984.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 22776e53cafafb80662d364aa4bc0a5549a524f2358a23760935f5144737fb56 bind-9.9.4-14.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:1984 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:1984 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 71b777287988c3414ed06e8c451598053077eee2e9f8a03f4ec31959c70b1ee9 cloud-init-0.7.9-24.el7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm Source:

Hi all, Debian Lenny, dovecot 1.0.15 My rkhunter script has picked up dovecot using port 1984 temporarily. When I run it now however, it is gone. Warning: Network TCP port 1984 is being used by /usr/lib/dovecot/imap. Possible rootkit: Fuckit Rootkit Use the 'lsof -i' or 'netstat -an' command to check this. Does dovecot use this port for any reason? anyone seen this before?

On 01/23/2015 05:50 AM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 16:18 +1300, Rob Kampen wrote: >> On 01/23/2015 04:05 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: >>> >>>> I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to >>>> be forced to ignore or deal with this crap.