similar to: Centos 8 and xfs_quota

Hi all, is any one aware quotas not working in 5,5? I'm using XFS as a file system. My fstab has the appropriate usrquota,grpquota but when I try to run; quotacheck -cug /foo I get; quotacheck: Can't find filesystem to check or filesystem not mounted with quota option. I already have a large amount of data in the mount. Do quotas get implemented on only empty filesystems and

Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are applied? mark

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On 08/09/18 14:57, mark wrote: > >> Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each >> user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how >> much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are >> applied? > > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you

Hi All, I have a very strange problem that I'm unable to pinpoint at the moment. For some reason I am simply unable to get xfs_quotas to report correctly on a freshly installed, fully patched CentOS 6 box. I have specified all the same options as on another machine which *is* reporting quota LABEL=TEST /exports/TEST xfs inode64,nobarrier,delaylog,usrquota,grpquota 0 0 xfs_quota -xc

Hi, I try to enable userquota an a new xfs filesystem. Its centos 6.5, the filesystem is mounted with usrquota, the server was rebooted. I thought xfs_quota -x -c 'limit bsoft=20000m bhard=22000m username' /home would set the quota for that user. But I do get an error: Command limit not found. Did I miss something? Any hints/how to beside the official sgi xfs and redhat doc

Y'all know I've been fighting this, on and off, for months. The last few days, I've done a *lot* of googling, and finally got a clue in a reply in a thread I found, where someone noted that you CANNOT enable things like pquotas on an XFS filesystem with mount -o remount, you *MUST* umount it, then mount it. In spite of mount showing the quota for the filesystem, it never worked. I

Hi all, I'm having fun getting to know xfs_quotas. I do notice some irregularities. When running xfs_quota -s -c /dev/sdc1 And then running report -h, for user barney, his used space is 4.9G while his soft/hard limit is 5G. Since I set 5, all is well, but when I run du -hs on barnies dir, it shows only 4G used. I can adjust for the diff so that my quotas can be set to 6G when I

I brought this up a month or so ago, and am just back to it: I've got a large RAID filesystem, mounted in one location, /<mntpt>/x/workspace, but we're having project directories that are under that magically appear under /workspace, as /workspace/projname1.... I need to set up xfs quotas by project, and I can't seem to find the right syntax. CentOS 6. Note that it's

Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under

Hi, I have a strange problem with user quotas enabled on a xfs filesystem and samba 3.0.21c: When a standard block device (e.g. /dev/sdc1) is used for the fs, quota works like expected: /dev/sdc1 on /mnt/tmp type xfs (rw,usrquota) output from level quota:10 debug: [2006/04/19 14:38:48, 10] lib/sysquotas.c:sys_get_quota(394) sys_get_quota() uid(4004, 4004) [2006/04/19 14:38:48, 10]

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi all, I run Samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 on a Ubuntu 8.04/x86_64 Xeon box. On one huge XFS file system, I have several shares, which have XFS project quotas applied. Looking at the file system info in Win (both 2k and xp), I see a *very* strange size display (see screen shot). Linux tells me about the folder hosting the share: root@mybox:~# df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:1120-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 xfsprogs - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only) This package is for the version of xfsprogs is that is included in the centosplus repo for CentOS-4 ... this is not an update to the main CentOS-4 repo. The SGI team has released a new xfsprogs SRPM for the XFS project. The following items have changed since the last release of this

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:1120-1 CentOS 4 i386 xfsprogs - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only) This package is for the version of xfsprogs is that is included in the centosplus repo for CentOS-4 ... this is not an update to the main CentOS-4 repo. The SGI team has released a new xfsprogs SRPM for the XFS project. The following items have changed since the last release of this package:

Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs filesystem on a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the barrier/nobarrier mount option as displayed in /proc/mounts is always set to "nobarrier" Here's an example: [root at host ~]# mount -o nobarrier /dev/vg1/homexfs /mnt [root at host ~]# grep xfs /proc/mounts /dev/vg1/homexfs /mnt xfs

Hi, we'd like to use glusterfs for Proxmox and virtual machines with qcow2 disk images. We have a three node glusterfs setup with one volume and Proxmox is attached and VMs are created, but after some time, and I think after much i/o is going on for a VM, the data inside the virtual machine gets corrupted. When I copy files from or to our glusterfs directly everything is OK, I've

Hi Chris, here is a link to the settings needed for VM storage: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/03592930239c3b43cbbdce17607c099ae075fd6d/extras/group-virt.example#L4 You can also ask in ovirt-users for real-world settings.Test well before changing production!!! IMPORTANT: ONCE SHARDING IS ENABLED, IT CANNOT BE DISABLED !!! Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov? On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 13:55,

Chris: Whilst I don't know what is the issue nor the root cause of your issue with using GlusterFS with Proxmox, but I am going to guess that you might already know that Proxmox "natively" supports Ceph, which the Wikipedia article for it says that it is a distributed object storage system. Maybe that might work better with Proxmox? Hope this helps. Sorry that I wasn't able

We use qcow2 with libvirt based kvm on many small clusters and have found it to be exremely reliable though maybe not the fastest, though some of that is most of our storage is SATA SSDs in a software RAID1 config for each brick. What problems are you running into? You just mention 'problems' -wk On 6/1/23 8:42 AM, Christian Schoepplein wrote: > Hi, > > we'd like to use

Hi everybody Regarding the issue with mount, usually I am using this systemd service to bring up the mount points: /etc/systemd/system/glusterfsmounts.service [Unit] Description=Glustermounting Requires=glusterd.service Wants=glusterd.service After=network.target network-online.target glusterd.service [Service] Type=simple RemainAfterExit=true ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/gluster volume list