similar to: python problem while trying to fix a separate issue

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "python problem while trying to fix a separate issue"

2020 Aug 09
2
python problem
Question for the list: I have a small, aircooled pc server, which is running fine, but the log gets filled with a series of messages saying the package, and each of 8 cpus is throttled because of thermal issues. Then, within the same second according to the timestamps, it reports everything is OK and throttling is off. This happens once every minute. In reality, when I try performance
2020 Aug 09
0
erroneous cpu thermal throttling / actually a python3 question
I have a small, aircooled pc server, which is running fine, but the log gets filled with a series of messages saying the package, and each of 8 cpus is throttled because of thermal issues. Then, within the same second according to the timestamps, it reports everything is OK and throttling is off. This happens once every minute. In reality, when I try performance tests, I believe the processor
2020 Aug 09
0
python problem
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 1:40 PM Chuck Campbell <campbell at accelinc.com> wrote: > ... > dnf copr enable abn/throttled > dnf install -y throttled > > but I get this output: > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides python3-configparser needed by throttled0.7-1.x86_64 > > I have no guess what to do about this. Well, that dependency is
2014 Jun 13
1
procmail and dovecot
Does anyone know how to get procmail and dovecot to play happily together with mboxes? I'm on Centos 6.5, fully patched. I'm getting tons of lock timeouts which is killing performance. I tried using dovecot's lda from procmail, which prompted many adjustments to selinux, which I managed, but it still gives permission problems, and I haven't succeeded in getting it to deliver
2014 Aug 06
3
slow i/o with a raid 50 on a 3ware controller
I have a raid 50 array on a 3ware controller. The box is running centos 6.5 and the file system is ext4. I'm going to try some other filesystems, but could anyone suggest any alternative raid setups as well as stripe sizes I should try? The old server uses the same controller on a centos 5.10 setup, using ext3, and it performs much faster i/o. The old 3ware setup is raid 5. -chuck --
2018 Apr 26
1
Postfix config problem w/ tls
I have followed the guides on setting up postfix relay to my account at network solutions. I added these to main.cf: inet_interfaces = localhost relayhost = [mail.mydomain.com]:587 smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtp_sasl_security_options = noanonymous smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_password smtp_use_tls = yes smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/sendmail.pem The username and
2016 Oct 10
4
upgrade reference docs
Is there a Centos 6.x to Centos 7.x guide somewhere? What has changed, that I need to learn about as an admin, before I jump in and flounder? thanks, -chuck -- ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics | (713)993-0671 ph. | and Integrated Interpretation | (713)993-0608 fax 448 W. 19th St. #325| Since 1992 | (713)306-5794 cell
2015 Jan 07
1
dovecot move doesn't work
On 1/7/2015 9:46 AM, Chuck Campbell wrote: > On 1/7/2015 12:06 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: >> Am 06.01.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Chuck Campbell: >>> I'm running centos 6.6 with the default 2.0.9-xxx dovecot. >>> >>> I run sa-learn against my spam_to_learn folder, then I wan to move those emails >>> to a learned_spam folder. >>> when I do a
2014 Aug 15
2
Bind config question, centos 5.10
I must have something mis-configured in my bond setup. Things are working, but I'm getting TONS of this sort of stuff in my log: +2001:502:ad09::4#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable resolving 'kns1.kuwaitnet.net/A/IN': +2001:503:231d::2:30#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable resolving 'kns1.kuwaitnet.net/A/IN': +2001:503:a83e::2:30#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable
2014 Jun 20
2
mail delivery question
I've built a new mail system with Centos 6.5, and I'm running fetchmail - sendmail - procmail to maildir. I have all of this working at the moment.(I know, postfix was the default, but for lots of other reasons, I switched, and that isn't an issue, I don't think). I am using dovecot as an imap server. Procmail won't update indexes during email delivery, so I'm having some
2009 Mar 04
3
Centos 5.x SElinux issues
I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday. I took the default selinux configuration. After that I ran yum update and found 600 plus updates and installs. I let it go to do the updates and during that process I saw a large number of issues in the selinux troubleshooter. I also see these kinds of things in /var/log/messages: **Unmatched Entries** (Only first 10 out of 49031
2018 Apr 30
0
Named log question
Is this mis-configuration, or just noise in my log? ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.056 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for '.': success: 1 Time(s) ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.120 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for 'dlv.isc.org': success: 1 Time(s) -chuck -- ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics |
2015 Jan 07
0
dovecot move doesn't work: RESLOVED
On 1/7/2015 4:01 PM, Peter wrote: > On 01/08/2015 05:39 AM, Chuck Campbell wrote: >> I tried this using yum install dovecot22, but I get a lot of these: >> file xxx from install of dovecot22-1:2.2.15-1.gf.el6.x86_64 conflicts with file >> from package dovecot-1:2.0.9-8.el6_6.4.x86_64 >> >> I tried yum update dovecot22, but I get: >> Package(s) dovecot22
2018 Apr 30
2
elrepo kmod-nvidia issue with update
when I do yum update, elrepo offers kmod-nvifdia, but yum does this: --> Processing Dependency: kernel(sme_me_mask) = 0x17fbce60 for package: kmod-nvidia-390.48-2.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: kernel(reservation_object_add_excl_fence) = 0xea98efc0 for package: kmod-nvidia-390.48-2.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: kernel(drm_vblank_init) = 0xdcd50a49 for
2014 Jun 16
1
SELinux issue?
I've recently built a new mail server with centos6.5, and decided to bite the bullet and leave SELinux running. I've stumbled through making things work and am mostly there. I've got my own spam and ham corpus as mbox files in /home/user/Mail/learned. These files came from my backup of the centos 5 server this machine is replacing. The folder is owned by the user (the following is
2013 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] configparser and ConfigParser are different
Okay, I've traced it to a bug in configparser, which on my python 2.7.4 system is a backport of configparser from python 3. Here is a clean patch that works around the problem. Geoffrey On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Geoffrey Irving <irving at naml.us> wrote: > LLVM builds with me on the release_33 branch, but fails on trunk. I > bisected the problem to this commit: > >
2020 Jun 21
6
firewall questions
I'm running Centos 7.8.2003, with firewalld. I was getting huge numbers of ssh attempts per day from a few specific ip blocks. The offenders are 45.0.0.0/24, 49.0.0.0/24, 51.0.0.0/24, 111.0.0.0/24 and 118.0.0.0/24, and they amounted to a multiple thousands of attempts per day. I installed and configured fail2ban, but still saw a lot of attempts in the logs, and the ipset created was
2013 Nov 06
2
[LLVMdev] configparser and ConfigParser are different
LLVM builds with me on the release_33 branch, but fails on trunk. I bisected the problem to this commit: commit b49fb7bcd5001567d2da06f6a6e1c7ba79649e1b Author: Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> Date: Wed Aug 14 23:15:39 2013 +0000 [llvm-build] Make Py3 compatible. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk at 188424 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014 Jun 16
4
iptables question
I'm running fail2ban to attempt to block malicious brute-force password dictionary attacks against ssh. They seem to be rolling through a block of ip addresses as the source to defeat this kind of screening, so I've set some ip addresses to be blocked in iptables. Here is the output of iptables -L (edited): Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination
2007 Dec 08
0
lmsensors sensors.conf file for gigabyte GA7N400 Pro2
Having done my fresh 5.0 install a couple months ago I'm slowly getting things back in to working condition. Decided last night to try setting up lmsensors. Got it all set up (modules, etc taken care of) and it runs and reports values, but some of 'em a clearly wrong with the default sensors.conf Trying to use the old sensors.conf I used on Centos 4 produces even more whacked-out results,