similar to: Thunderbird 68.10.0

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Thunderbird 68.10.0"

2020 Jul 29
1
Thunderbird 68.10.0
On 7/27/20 1:43 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Am 27.07.20 um 19:50 schrieb Chris Schanzle via CentOS: >> Sorry if I'm being overly impatient, but is there some snag with >> releasing Thunderbird 68.10.0 for EL8? >> >> [RHSA-2020:3038-01] Important: thunderbird security update >> >> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:3038 >> >>
2020 Jul 27
0
Thunderbird 68.10.0
Am 27.07.20 um 19:50 schrieb Chris Schanzle via CentOS: > Sorry if I'm being overly impatient, but is there some snag with releasing Thunderbird 68.10.0 for EL8? > > [RHSA-2020:3038-01] Important: thunderbird security update > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:3038 > > Thanks! > at the door: https://git.centos.org/rpms/thunderbird/releases -- Leon
2024 Jan 18
2
Missing python-reportlab-2.5-11.el7_9
I am having troubles finding the -11 update to python-reportlab.? I just got dinged for: Remote package installed : python-reportlab-2.5-10.el7 Should be??????????????? : python-reportlab-2.5-11.el7_9 I don't see it in the list of updates, my local mirror, or at: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/ Thanks, Chris
2022 Dec 14
1
Trouble with kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64
Has this been solved? Is there a bug report I can follow? Thank you for letting me know, Val?re Binet On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:23 PM Bill Gee <bgee at campercaver.net> wrote: > On the other hand --- I just upgraded one of my CentOS7 systems to > 3.10.0-1160.80.1 today. With that kernel it will not run any KVM guest. > The system hangs - HARD - within one or two seconds of
2023 Feb 15
2
thunderbird-102.7.1-1.el8 breaks OAuth authentication
On 2/14/23 08:49, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 1/29/23 11:24, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> It seems that thunderbird-102.7.1-1.el8 (at least on CentOS Stream) broke >> OAuth authentication with outlook.office365.com.? Downgrading to >> 102.4.0-1.el8 resolved the issue. >> >> Error console reports: >> >> XHR POST
2023 Jan 29
2
thunderbird-102.7.1-1.el8 breaks OAuth authentication
It seems that thunderbird-102.7.1-1.el8 (at least on CentOS Stream) broke OAuth authentication with outlook.office365.com. Downgrading to 102.4.0-1.el8 resolved the issue. Error console reports: XHR POST https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/v2.0/token [HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request 293ms] Is anyone else seeing this? -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing
2023 Jan 30
1
thunderbird-102.7.1-1.el8 breaks OAuth authentication
On 29/01/2023 18:24, Orion Poplawski wrote: > It seems that thunderbird-102.7.1-1.el8 (at least on CentOS Stream) > broke OAuth authentication with outlook.office365.com.? Downgrading to > 102.4.0-1.el8 resolved the issue. > > Error console reports: > > XHR POST https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/v2.0/token > [HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request 293ms] > > Is
2020 Apr 23
2
Looking for C8 AMD help
I'm migrating from C7 to C8.? I'm currently using autofs, but alas autofs has been dropped in C8 for the AMD automounter. I have some very ancient knowledge of AMD, I used it when it was first introduced many years ago on Solaris and moved to Sun's automounter when it was introduced. So now it's back to square one. I used automount2amd to convert one of my existing maps,
2009 Jan 08
2
CESA-2009:0004 Important CentOS 5 i386 openssl Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0004 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0004.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 2a913c110d33659b1252c68e35702817 openssl097a-0.9.7a-9.el5_2.1.i386.rpm 4b2e6bb3007a59fbb5a685023432d666 openssl-0.9.8b-10.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
2009 Jan 08
2
CESA-2009:0004 Important CentOS 5 i386 openssl Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0004 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0004.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 2a913c110d33659b1252c68e35702817 openssl097a-0.9.7a-9.el5_2.1.i386.rpm 4b2e6bb3007a59fbb5a685023432d666 openssl-0.9.8b-10.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
2019 Feb 16
3
Changing UID numbers
Hello everyone - Update: Many thanks to Matt Miller for the tip on usermod options. That worked very well! I did not know those options existed and would never have thought to look for them. After making and testing backups, I started with my main workstation. Rebooted in runmode=3, then ran the usermod -u and -g options. I did this in two runs. I first had to uninstall docker since it
2020 May 14
2
Ailing MATE desktop
> On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 10:26 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS > wrote: >> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS >> wrote: >> > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing >> > MATE >> > from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without >> > ripping >>
2020 Jan 16
2
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
Just as a followup even g++ is broken: [piot at paris ~]$ g++ bash: g++: command not found... Install package 'gcc-c++' to provide command 'g++'? [N/y] y * Waiting in queue... The following packages have to be downgraded: cpp-8.2.1-3.5.el8.x86_64 The C Preprocessor glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.i686 The GNU libc libraries glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.x86_64 The GNU libc libraries
2020 May 05
2
Ailing MATE desktop
On Tue, 5 May 2020 05:30:26 -0400 Eddie O'Connor wrote: > Are there .conf files for the desktop?....what about logs?....something's > got to be amiss somewhere....and Linux always complains when it is.....in > logs. Just wondering out loud... What happens if he sets up a new user? Does the desktop work then? -- Can we uninstall 2020 and install it again? This one has a virus.
2020 Jan 16
2
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
All, While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some package with unresolved dependencies. I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is trying to install the dependencies. . This happens for some critical package like boost-openmpi-devel (see below for
2020 Aug 17
2
C8 - Register with Red Hat
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:37:20 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > "This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use > subscription-manager to register." It sounds like you have something installed that doesn't need to be or shouldn't be installed. Under what circumstances does that message appear? I haven't seen it on any of my C8 systems,
2020 May 05
2
Ailing MATE desktop
I need some C8 troubleshooting help with MATE. I'm building a ZFS storage server with a SuperMicro H11SSL motherboard, EPYC 7232 CPU, and 32 GB ECC SDRAM. I installed CentOS 8.1.1911 from the iso as soon as it was released. I'm using the on-board ASPEED VGA video. I installed MATE v1.22 from https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stenstorp/MATE/. The following packages are installed:
2020 Aug 17
2
C8 - Register with Red Hat
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > What appears is below. Removing dependent packages is required. Removing unused dependencies is optional. dnf remove *subscription* --noautoremove should remove the dependent packages but keep thee unused dependencies if you want them. There's also a setting in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf to set the default behaviour of the autoremove
2020 Jan 16
3
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
I am doing a dnf install package_without_version for instance for g++: [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf install gcc-c++ Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:06 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 06:45:59 AM CST. Error: Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers can be installed - package glibc-devel-2.28-72.el8.i686 requires glibc-headers, but
2019 Oct 08
2
Centos missing kmod-kvdo
hi, I'm testing the new CentOS 8, seems latest kmod-kvdo-6.2.0.293-50.el8.x86_64 does not contain modules for latest kernel kernel-4.18.0-80.7.1.el8_0.x86_64 ?rpm -ql kmod-kvdo-6.2.0.293-50.el8.x86_64 /etc/depmod.d/kvdo.conf /lib/modules/4.18.0-79.el8+2.x86_64 /lib/modules/4.18.0-79.el8+2.x86_64/extra /lib/modules/4.18.0-79.el8+2.x86_64/extra/kmod-kvdo