similar to: Port forward internal host not working

I have an accountant, but still need todo my part from the business' end. They don't invoice my clients. Quickbooks works very well, but keeps me stuck in Windows land. It's just as well saying I cannot drive a car cause I don't want to learn how to overhaul the engine, or I cannot be a system admin cause I don't want to learn how the electronics on the PC boards work. On

I have to say, GnuCash simply doesn't do it for me. As a tech, I don't have time to figure out accounting systems, and I really don't want to have this info on the internet in 3rd party's control. On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:09 PM <me at tdiehl.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:22 PM Rudi Ahlers

On 22/06/2020 13:57, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > I have to say, GnuCash simply doesn't do it for me. As a tech, I don't > have time to figure out accounting systems, and I really don't want to > have this info on the internet in 3rd party's control. > > >>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:22 PM Rudi Ahlers <rudiahlers at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote: > How do I insert the iptables rule below using firewalld? > > I'm moving up from CentOS 6 to 7 on an office gateway and I'm trying to > get OpenVPN working to allow home workers to access PCs at the office. I've > got it all working but only by manually inserting an ACCEPT rule in

Hello! I''ve the following set-up RemoteClient1 (Win Vista), RemoteClient2 (Win XP) do both connect to my OpenVPN box. They can talk to each other, using their 172.16.1.x tun0 Address on the server. The server itself (Ubuntu gutsy, OpenVPN: 2.0.9-8, shorewall:3.4.4-1) has 1 NIC that connects the machine to a) a DSL-router (forwards several ports to this linux machine, including the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=507 Summary: tun99 don't trapped by tun+ Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:22 PM Rudi Ahlers <rudiahlers at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am looking for an offline accounting package recommendation, please. >> I enjoyed using Xero accounting, but need something that's offline, >> and where the data remains my property. Having used Quickbooks on

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:22 PM Rudi Ahlers <rudiahlers at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for an offline accounting package recommendation, please. > I enjoyed using Xero accounting, but need something that's offline, > and where the data remains my property. Having used Quickbooks on > Windows in the past, I am looking for something similar. > > Any

Hi, I got an existing solution with shorewall where I can differentiate tun10 from tun+ as different zone. For example: /etc/shorewall/zones A ipv4 B:A ipv4 /etc/shorewall/interfaces A tun+ B tun10 Now, I have a requirement to add tun11 to zone B. When I do this in interfaces config: A tun+ B tun10,tun11 It doesn''t like it (although it''s ok when performing

On Thursday 21 of April 2016 2:37:49 PM Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/21/2016 01:33 PM, Marcin Trendota wrote: > > It's OpenVPN on chamber. > What port is it using? I don't see the standard port listed in your > firewalld rules in either zone. 1194/udp. I added service openvpn and port 1194/udp (just to be sure) to both zones - no change. [root at chamber openvpn]#

Hi, I am looking for an offline accounting package recommendation, please. I enjoyed using Xero accounting, but need something that's offline, and where the data remains my property. Having used Quickbooks on Windows in the past, I am looking for something similar. Any recommendations? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Website: http://www.rudiahlers.co.za

hey friends, I have installed OpenVPN 2.0.7 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu [SSL] [LZO] [EPOLL] built on Apr 29 2006) on Centos4.0 through rpm (diag repository). The network scenario of my office is below Remote Client ----> Internet <-------> Cisco Pix Firewall (Gateway) <----> VPN Server & LAN Clients

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 05:31, Rudi Ahlers <rudiahlers at gmail.com> wrote: > > Could not start rdesktop: make sure rdesktop is properly installed > > krdc is just a front-end to several different tools (rdesktop, > vncviewer, etc.), it will call rdesktop to

Hi, [Summary] There seems to be a bug when using the "+" wildcard notation in the interfaces file, in that rules are not generated in the fwd chain to permit traffic going out an interface with a "+" in it. [Details] The interface entries: loc tun0 detect routeback,newnotsyn loc tun1 detect routeback,newnotsyn loc tun2

W dniu 29.12.2017 o?10:32, Kenneth Porter pisze: > How do I insert the iptables rule below using firewalld? > > I'm moving up from CentOS 6 to 7 on an office gateway and I'm trying > to get OpenVPN working to allow home workers to access PCs at the > office. I've got it all working but only by manually inserting an > ACCEPT rule in the FORWARD iptables chain: >

Hi, This subject has been brought up in the forum, but it''s a bit different. If I have a set of tun interfaces. I already defined tun+ as zone A, and I have excluded tun15 as zone B (a subset of zone A). I need to add tun16 to zone B. My config: /etc/shorewall/interfaces: A tun+ - routeback B tun15 /etc/shorewall/ A ipv4 B:A ipv4 I tried to define in

Hello, I have a webcam that I wish to view from the internet. It is a wireless linksys model with an ip address of 192.168.1.15. I have it set on port 8081, 192.168.1.15:8081. I am using the IP Masquerade HowTo script. Here's the rule I added to my firewall script: EXTIF="ppp0" INTIF="eth1" EXTIP="`$IFCONFIG $EXTIF | grep inet | cut -d : -f 2 | cut -d \ -f

Le 29/12/2017 ? 10:32, Kenneth Porter a ?crit?: > How do I insert the iptables rule below using firewalld? > > I'm moving up from CentOS 6 to 7 on an office gateway and I'm trying > to get OpenVPN working to allow home workers to access PCs at the > office. I've got it all working but only by manually inserting an > ACCEPT rule in the FORWARD iptables chain: >

Via creative use of the instructions at http://shorewall.net/Multiple_Zones.html#id2497549. But can a zone (in shorewall/interfaces) reference multiple interfaces? I have two openvpn instances running on my server, one bridged (for upstream access to some client vpn''s so I don''t have to request the clients add new subnets to their routing tables) and one routed (for nailed

Hi, I am trying to remove a brick, from a server which is no longer part of the gluster pool, but I keep running into errors for which I cannot find answers on google. [root at virt2 ~]# gluster peer status Number of Peers: 3 Hostname: srv1 Uuid: 2bed7e51-430f-49f5-afbc-06f8cec9baeb State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected) Hostname: srv3 Uuid: 0e78793c-deca-4e3b-a36f-2333c8f91825 State: Peer in