similar to: NetworkManager, Centos 8, Ipv6 Prefix Delegation

Hello, I was wondering if any one has seen issues with selinux name_bind denials that result from having IP:PORT bindings for services to specific IP addresses managed on an interface under NetworkManager's control? I do realize that people will probably say stop using NetworkManager, and I may, but the behavior is strange, and I'd like to have a better understanding of what's going

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "James Hogarth" <james.hogarth at gmail.com> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Donderdag 11 juni 2015 19:59:39 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs On 11 Jun 2015 13:28, <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> wrote: > > > > ----- Oorspronkelijk

Hello All, on the latest installs I've done, on 2 different types of Latitude laptops, with 3 different wireless cars, of Centos7 and Mate desktop, it looks to me like NetworkManager is nog managing wireless. When clicking the nm icon in the top right corner, I'm not seeing access points. Wifi seems enabled [root at localhost ~]# nmcli g STATE CONNECTIVITY WIFI-HW WIFI WWAN-HW

Hi list, I've installed C8 on my workstation. I configured my network devices (two bridges, two nics) using nmcli. Now that NM is the default I tried it. On C7 I always disabled it. I noticed some problem: 1) During the boot, also if NetworkManager-wait-online.service status is OK, I noticed that opening a terminal and ping some address it needs some time to perform ping and any

Hi, folks, I 've created interfaces files with the NM_CONTROLLED=no statement and I've found that even after restarting network services changes are not commited. Only it worked after running ```` nmcli connection reload ```` restart of the network service worked. I wonder if it's either a feature or a bug... Could you help me? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2

On 21-03-17 20:51, Diaulas Castro wrote: > Used steps on sysctl from Centos7 FAQ (https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS7) and some gathered on internet > > # cat /etc/sysctl.d/90-disable_ipv6.conf > net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 > net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=1 > net.ipv6.conf.eth0.disable_ipv6=1 > net.ipv6.conf.eth1.disable_ipv6=1 > net.ipv6.conf.all.use_tempaddr=0

Once upon a time, Alessandro Baggi <alessandro.baggi at gmail.com> said: > 3) I noticed that with NetworkManager a bridge must have an address. > If I don't specify an address for the bridge, NM will try to assign > some address, enable the connection? forever (reporting errors in > messages and on notification bar). Do you have the device configured to not configure IP?

On 11 Jun 2015 13:28, <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> wrote: > > > > ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- > Van: "johan vermeulen7" <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> > Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 18:23:58 > Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs

On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: > Hi All, > > I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. > Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red > Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as > expected. > When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but > not connected to

Hi All, I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as expected. When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but not connected to any device. Two bonds with the same name is confusing for my other monitoring

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "johan vermeulen7" <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 18:23:58 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "m roth" <m.roth at 5-cent.us> Aan: "CentOS

Can somebody takes part in adding the following functionality to Samba4: It is necassary to do Samba4 computer as multi DMB or I think more likely as multi LMB for multigroups additionally to default main domain / group. That is necasary to add to Samba4 such functionality in Samba4 code and add to smb.conf at least 3 parameters: - multi browser support = yes/no - switch on / off this feature -

Hi Neil, Thanks for your comments. What's the purpose of creating spurious ?bond0?? It's confusing. Is it anywhere documented? Every time I restart NetworkManager it creates another bond0! Joe On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: > >> Hi All, >

On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. >> Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red >> Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as >> expected. >> When I restart

Dear Mark, thanks for the additional hints. On 22/09/2020 17:26, Mark Milhollan wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Felix K?lzow wrote: > >> A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which >> causes several issues in our setup. > >> # nmcli con show >> NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE >> eno4?????

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > >> Hello FrancisM, >> >> Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: >> >> >> > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is >> failing to

Once upon a time, Lists <lists at benjamindsmith.com> said: > I understand that it's possible to allow the 4 VM guest systems to each have a > "direct" fixed IP address and access the addresses \via the host network > adapter, while the host retains its fixed IP. If you are running NetworkManager (the default), it's not too hard. Here's an example

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:20 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello FrancisM, >>> >>> Thursday, April 7,

This is happening with the Centos7-armv7 image 1804, but I was wondering if it is a broader C7 issue. My image has only 2 ifcfg files:? ifcfg-l0 and -link.? 'ip a' is listing the ethernet as eth0.? ifcfg-link has contains: DEVICE=link BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT=on I then used nmcli to create my ifcfg-eth0 nmcli con delete eth0 nmcli con add type ethernet con-name eth0 ifname eth0 ip4

Hello FrancisM, Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing to > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > 2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40